| Revision as of 01:24, 20 May 2008 editKleenupKrew (talk | contribs)1,323 edits →Wallace Collins, Esq.: endorse← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:44, 20 May 2008 edit undoGuest9999 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,831 edits defy the point?Next edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| **I'm not opposed to such thing, but to do so, we could restore this article, merge what's relevant over and then redirect it, even if it's a protected redirect. Best, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 23:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC) | **I'm not opposed to such thing, but to do so, we could restore this article, merge what's relevant over and then redirect it, even if it's a protected redirect. Best, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 23:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Restore history and leave as a redirect''' Editors can very easily look at old version on the history to find the information they need, and even make a link to the preferred old version on their user page to use as a bookmark --] (]) 13:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC) | *'''Restore history and leave as a redirect''' Editors can very easily look at old version on the history to find the information they need, and even make a link to the preferred old version on their user page to use as a bookmark --] (]) 13:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :*Doesn't that kind of defy the point of deleting an article? ] (]) 02:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
Revision as of 02:44, 20 May 2008
| < May 17 | Deletion review archives: 2008 May | May 19 > |
|---|
18 May 2008
Halloweentown (film) (closed)
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
History-only undeletion -- currently a bad recreate, then a redirect to the wrong page. According to the log, it has been speedy deleted twice recently:
Unfortunately, there are a lot of links to this popular film page. My 'tween nieces are upset. Although I don't know much about it, I'm sure it can be improved to the level of the other related film pages. I'm sick in bed this weekend, and I'll try to at least fix it to a minimal level using the prior content.
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
List of Avatar: The Last Airbender major secondary characters
- List of Avatar: The Last Airbender major secondary characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Avatar: The Last Airbender major secondary characters (2nd nomination) closed as "delete"; however, I think it was more a "no consensus" per my reasoning at User_talk:Sandstein#Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion.2FList_of_Avatar:_The_Last_Airbender_major_secondary_characters_.282nd_nomination.29. Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 19:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment' wouldn't it be better just to somewhat expand the description in the List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters ? DGG (talk) 20:38, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not opposed to such thing, but to do so, we could restore this article, merge what's relevant over and then redirect it, even if it's a protected redirect. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 23:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Restore history and leave as a redirect Editors can very easily look at old version on the history to find the information they need, and even make a link to the preferred old version on their user page to use as a bookmark --Enric Naval (talk) 13:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Doesn't that kind of defy the point of deleting an article? Guest9999 (talk) 02:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Wallace Collins, Esq.
- Wallace Collins, Esq. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)
Valid page Hermit711 (talk) 14:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. The page in question is Wallace Collins, Esq.. Fix't above. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 14:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Endorse. Nom has given no reason to overturn deletion and AfD was closed properly. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 14:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Overturn Please ,In both Talk and again in the page itself his Notability was expressed He has been the attorney of many people already listed on Misplaced Pages and has many Articles written about him in the Press. This was noted on the page i created and in the Talk about Wallace Collins Esq.
His whole family has been Lawyers and his Grandfather was a famaous Lawyer during the Prohibition years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hermit711 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC) --Hermit711 (talk) 15:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Wallace Collins, Esq.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wallace_Collins%2C_Esq.&action=edit&redlink=1>
His Notability is evident in that he has been cited in Major Newspaper and Music Trade Pubs, and he has made case Law in the Copyright and Trademark arenas.
Please look at his page if i did it wrong then i need someone to put a Misplaced Pages page up that knows what they are doing this is all very confusing to me.
http://www.wallacecollins.com/
Under his legal victories you can see the articles that have been reported on him such as; http://www.wallacecollins.com/la.html
Making Case Law
http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw5.jpg http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw4.jpg http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw3.jpg http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw2.jpg
These are just some examples. --Hermit711 (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
His Notability is evident in that he has been cited in Major Newspaper and Music Trade Pubs, and he has made case Law in the Copyright and Trademark arenas.--Hermit711 (talk) 15:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Also as stated elsewhere i have put up just some of the Cites here also i have stated he was a recording artist and here is that information :
His band was THE DYNOMITERS They were featured in 16 Magazine and other teen magazines and got press in the trades we were signed to Epic Records in 76 the most notable song was "Rock & Roll President"
--Hermit711 (talk) 17:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Endorse: No assertion of notability, badly written, only 2 references, no internal links, no sections... Need I go on? (The notability and references are the biggest concerns)...... Dendodge .. Talk 18:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I have listed His band i have listed the Song. I have listed just 4 of Articles about him there are more i would put into the page if it were still there. I have listed the page where all the articles i have for him are, all by Major Publications, The Times the Post , DMA , etc this is not enough?
As to form yes i need help writing the page BUT the Notability issue is very well covered just in what i have written here, he is at least as Notable as his Clients, that are listed in Misplaced Pages.
If you are saying it is bad writting on my part then so be it i have asked for help, and i was NOT done writing it i ran out of time. But i will take any help i can get, to do that however, i need the page put back up. And i do not Understand what is meant by Assertion of Notability His winning Cases alone cover that "Whoomp there it is" was a major Sampling case. And he was in a music group in 1976 as stated above is that not enough? --Hermit711 (talk) 18:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
The "Whoomp there it is" Case which i believe i provided links for in the original article was Notable it made case Law on Sampling in copyright and that was not the only one, and maybe his music group was not wonderful by todays standards, but then it was covered and He would not be the Only 1 hit wonder covered in Misplaced Pages. If i did not write the Article correctly, I thought i was following the guidelines and over a week or 2 figured i would get it right, there are people who will help me fix that. But his notability Can Not be questioned by your Own Guidelines, As a 1 hit Wonder he is Notable by Misplaced Pages standards, or many other pages should be deleted. --Hermit711 (talk) 18:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion His song was not a chart hit or anything as far as I can tell. If you can cite the reliable sources you have, then maybe I'd ask for an over turn. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 20:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- comment The logical first step would be to try to write an acceptable article demonstrating notability for the band. DGG (talk) 20:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion - the AFD was validly closed. The way forward is for the nominator to write a new article in user space and then come back here with a request for it to be moved across. Smile a While (talk) 23:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion. Valid closure, nothing out of process, consensus was 100% in favor of deletion. KleenupKrew (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Image:The Simpsons Opening Credits Circus Couch Gag.ogg
- Image:The Simpsons Opening Credits Circus Couch Gag.ogg (edit | ] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)
Media DID contain the correct source and info, but was deleted under CSD I4 anyway Adammw (talk - please email me for contact) 13:02, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Image:The Simpsons Movie Opening Credits.ogg
- Image:The Simpsons Movie Opening Credits.ogg (edit | ] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)
Media DID contain the correct source and info, but was deleted under CSD I4 anyway Adammw (talk - please email me for contact) 13:02, 18 May 2008 (UTC)