Misplaced Pages

Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:57, 21 May 2008 editBoodlesthecat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,411 edits →International: add Wiesels's own review if its going to be critiqued; more accurate subhead← Previous edit Revision as of 15:14, 21 May 2008 edit undoPoeticbent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,717 edits there’s a certain expectation of an encyclopedia entry. Manual of style, balance, and no sweeping generalizationsNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz''''' is a book by ], published by ] in 2006 in the US, and by ] outside the US. A Polish version was published in Krakow as ''Strach: antysemityzm w Polsce tuż po wojnie: historia moralnej zapaści'' by ] publishers in 2008. '''''Fear''''' is an expansion of themes from his 2001 book ''].'' In this book, Gross explores the issues concerning incidents of ], with particular focus on the 1946 ]. The book received international attention with reviews in major newspapers, but has also been a subject of much criticism from Polish historians. '''''Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz''''' is a book by ], published by ] and ] in 2006. A Polish version was published in ] as ''Strach: antysemityzm w Polsce tuż po wojnie: historia moralnej zapaści'' by ] Publishers in 2008. '''''Fear''''' is an expansion of themes from his 2001 book ''].'' In this book, Gross explores the issues concerning incidents of ], with particular focus on the 1946 ]. The book received international attention with reviews in major newspapers, but has also been a subject of much criticism from Polish historians.


==Content== ==Content==
In the English version of the book, Gross begins with a chapter illustrating ] suffered by ] during ] including the physical ], ] between ] and ], the subsequent ] and the ] of Polish army officers by the ]; the ] of 1944, as well as the Soviet decision to postpone their advance until the German army had defeated the Polish ], which resulted in the destruction of Warsaw "reduced to a pile of rubble." And finally, ] knowingly consigned to half a century of Soviet ] domination by Britain and America at the ]. In the English version of the book, Gross begins with a chapter illustrating ] suffered by ] during ] including the physical ], ] between ] and ], the subsequent ] and the ] of Polish army officers by the ]; the ] of 1944, as well as the Soviet decision to postpone their advance until the German army had defeated the Polish ], which resulted in the destruction of Warsaw "reduced to a pile of rubble." And finally, ] knowingly consigned to half a century of Soviet ] domination by Britain and America at the ].


Gross estimates that 250,000 Polish Jews returned home at the end of the war. Often, they would find their property occupied by the homeless or taken over by the ] government ] much of the Polish economy. He discusses the alienation, hostile atmosphere and violence experienced by some Jews and the inability of Polish elites to prevent it.<ref name="esummary"></ref> Gross makes additional claims about the ], in which 40 returning Jewish ] survivors were murdered in the Polish town of Kielce,) arguing that the pogrom was initiated not by a mob, but by the police, and involved people from every walk of life except the highest level of government officials in the city (Fear, pp. 83-166). Gross estimates that 250,000 Polish Jews returned home at the end of the war. Often, they would find their property occupied by the homeless or taken over by the ] government ] much of the Polish economy. He discusses the alienation, hostile atmosphere and violence experienced by some Jews and the inability of Polish elites to prevent it.<ref name="esummary"></ref> Gross makes additional claims about the ] arguing that the crime was initiated not by a mob, but by the police, and involved people from every walk of life except the highest level of government officials in the city (Fear, pp. 83-166).


Gross concludes with the controversial claim that the cause of postwar ] in Poland was the presumed wartime participation of selected Poles, especially in rural areas, in the Nazi effort to annihilate and despoil the Jews. The fear of punishment for their own crimes, according to Gross, was what drove them to continue attacking Jews after the war (hence the title of the book).<ref name="esummary"/><ref name="Gont"/> Gross writes in ''Fear'':<blockquote>We must seek the reasons for the novel, virulent quality of postwar anti-Semitism in Poland not in collective hallucinations Gross concludes with the controversial claim that the cause of postwar ] in Poland was the presumed wartime participation of selected Poles, especially in rural areas, in the Nazi effort to annihilate and despoil the Jews. The fear of punishment for their own crimes, according to Gross, was what drove them to continue attacking Jews after the war (hence the title of the book).<ref name="esummary"/><ref name="Gont"/><ref>Jan T. Gross. ''Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz. An Essay in Historical Interpretation.'' New York, Random House, 2006. Quoted in: David Engel, On Continuity and Discontinuity in Polish-Jewish Relations: Observations on Fear: Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz—An Essay in Historical Interpretation by Jan T. Gross. New York: Random House, 2006, East European Politics & Societies, Vol. 21, No. 3, 534-548 (2007)</ref>
nor in prewar attitudes, but in actual experiences acquired during the war years...Living Jews embodied the massive failure of character and reason on the part of their Polish neighbors and constituted by mere presence both a reminder and a threat that they might need to account for themselves.<ref>Jan T. Gross. ''Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz. An Essay in Historical Interpretation.'' New York, Random House, 2006. Quoted in: David Engel, On Continuity and Discontinuity in Polish-Jewish Relations: Observations on Fear: Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz—An Essay in Historical Interpretation by Jan T. Gross. New York: Random House, 2006, East European Politics & Societies, Vol. 21, No. 3, 534-548 (2007)</ref></blockquote>


===Differences between the Polish and English edition=== ===Differences between the Polish and English edition===

The Polish version was different because Gross assumed that his Polish readers were familiar with the tragic history of wartime Poland. The English-version first chapter was replaced by a chapter documenting Polish awareness of the Nazi genocide of the Jews. In particular, Gross makes his Polish readers aware that the ] rounded up Jewish men, women and children and committed mass murders in "full view" of the Polish population.{{Fact|date=May 2008}} In a dialogue with ] at ] on May 8, 2008, Gross stated that he now feels that he should have made a different decision about what to include in the Polish edition.{{Fact|date=May 2008}} The Polish version was different because Gross assumed that his Polish readers were familiar with the tragic history of wartime Poland. The English-version first chapter was replaced by a chapter documenting Polish awareness of the Nazi genocide of the Jews. In particular, Gross makes his Polish readers aware that the ] rounded up Jewish men, women and children and committed mass murders in "full view" of the Polish population.{{Fact|date=May 2008}} In a dialogue with ] at ] on May 8, 2008, Gross stated that he now feels that he should have made a different decision about what to include in the Polish edition.{{Fact|date=May 2008}}


==Reception== ==Reception==
===United States=== ===United States===
''Fear'' received praise in reviews in a number of popular magazines and newspapers including '']'' (by ]),<ref>David Margolick. ''The New York Times'', July 23, 2006</ref> the '']'' (by ])<ref>Elie Wiesel. . ''The Washington Post'', June 25, 2006.</ref>, the '']'' (by ])<ref>Susan Rubin Suleiman. Aftershocks. The Boston Globe, July 02, 2006</ref> the '']''<ref>''Kirkus Reviews'' 74.9 (May 1, 2006): p448(1).</ref> and the ''Los Angeles Times'' (by ]).<ref name="LAT">Thane Rosenbaum, (pdf), book review of ''Fear'', '']'', June 25, 2006.</ref> ] laureate Wiesel, reviewing the book, wrote that, in contrast to the view that antisemtism had "had died at Auschwitz with its victims," in fact, he believed "only the dead perished at Birkenau; antisemitism itself survived in most places, and mostly in Poland. This is, in sum, what Jan Gross reveals." Wiesel rejected the notion of collective guilt for all of Poland, but notes that Gross' book impels Poland to confront its past.<ref>Elie Wiesel. . ''The Washington Post'', June 25, 2006.</ref> ''Fear'' received praise in reviews in a number of popular magazines and newspapers including '']'' (by ]),<ref>David Margolick. ''The New York Times'', July 23, 2006</ref> the '']'' (by ]),<ref>Elie Wiesel. . ''The Washington Post'', June 25, 2006.</ref> the ''],''<ref>Susan Rubin Suleiman. Aftershocks. The Boston Globe, July 02, 2006</ref> the '']''<ref>''Kirkus Reviews'' 74.9 (May 1, 2006): p448(1).</ref> and the ''Los Angeles Times'' (by ]).<ref name="LAT">Thane Rosenbaum, (pdf), book review of ''Fear'', '']'', June 25, 2006.</ref> Elie Wiesel reviewing the book rejected the notion of collective guilt for all of Poland, but noted that Gross' book impels Poland to confront its past.<ref>Elie Wiesel. . ''The Washington Post'', June 25, 2006.</ref>


The ], a Polish-American think tank, held a symposium analyzing ''Fear'' and its reception. The symposium was critical of the above popular newspaper and magazine reviews, concluding that "Reviewers in major newspapers such as the '']'', '']'' and the '']'', none of whom has any expertise in Polish or East Central European history, have reacted to the book with uncritical acclaim and considerable ] rhetoric. As such, it is clear already that ''Fear'' will have a serious and negative effect on ]." <ref name="intro"></ref> For example, in the analysis of Wiesel's review was among those that have generated the most discussion, and Washington post itself reprinted a response by ], Polish ambassador to the United States, <ref></ref>, who cited a well known ] editor and writer, ], own reply to Wiesel's review, published recently in ], a leading Polish newspaper: "Wiesel's review conveys the image of a country unable to confront the plague of anti-Semitism... There is probably no other country in East Central Europe that accounted for the dark chapters of its own history with such seriousness and honesty... Anyone who writes about anti-Semitism in Poland and ignores those facts, falsifies -- even if unintentionally - - the truth about Poland." With the regards to criticism of the reviews in popular press, for example, Rosenbaum's review (cited above) was reviewed by the Piast Institute, which concluded that he has "present the argument in highly emotional and hyperbolic prose and is given to exaggeration...".<ref></ref> Piast Institute was also critical of the Gross' book itself, concluding that "the thesis of the book is highly controversial and many Poles and others also find it unfair and tendentious".<ref name="purpose"></ref> The ], a ] think tank, held a symposium analyzing ''Fear'' and its reception. The symposium concluded that: "Reviewers in major newspapers such as the '']'', '']'' and the '']'', none of whom has any expertise in Polish or East Central European history, have reacted to the book with uncritical acclaim and considerable ] rhetoric. As such, it is clear already that ''Fear'' will have a serious and negative effect on ]." <ref name="intro"></ref> Wiesel's review was among those that have generated most discussion. The ''Washington Post'' reprinted a response by ], a Polish ambassador to the United States,<ref></ref> who cited a well known ] editor and writer ]'s reply to Wiesel's review. Michnik wrote in a leading Polish daily ] that: "Wiesel's review conveys the image of a country unable to confront the plague of anti-Semitism... falsifies &ndash; even if unintentionally &ndash; the truth about Poland." With regards to Rosenbaum's review Piast Institute concluded that he has "presented the argument in highly emotional and hyperbolic prose and is given to exaggeration...".<ref></ref> Piast Institute was critical of the book itself, concluding that "the thesis of the book is highly controversial and many Poles and others also find it unfair and tendentious".<ref name="purpose"></ref>


===In Poland=== ===In Poland===
''Fear'' has caused controversy in Poland (where it was published in 2008). Polish historian ] said Gross had succeeded in stirring up emotions. He was doubtful whether the public debate, which he called a media circus, would do much good.{{fact}} The German magazine '']'' described the book as having generated a "right-wing backlash" in the country and quoted Polish rabbi ] who said that it is unfair to depict the country as anti-Semitic thus "harming our goal of reconciliation."<ref>Siobhán Dowling. ''Spiegel International''. January 18, 2008.</ref><ref name=Whitlock>Craig Whitlock, , Washington Post Foreign Service, Friday, January 18, 2008; Page A14</ref> ''Fear'' has been criticized by historians such as ],<ref name=Whitlock/> ],<ref name="Gont"/> ],<ref name="TRad"></ref> ],<ref name="Kurtyka"/> ]<ref name="Stola">Dariusz Stolam Review of Fear, in The English Historical Review 2007 CXXII(499):1460-1463; doi:10.1093/ehr/cem344 </ref> and ];<ref name="Choda"/><ref name=Whitlock/> accusing Gross of imperfect ],<ref name="Choda"/><ref name="Gont"/> generalizations,<ref name="Choda"/><ref name="Stola"/> stereotyping,<ref name="Choda"/> ignoring works which did not confirm his views,<ref name="Gont"/> neglecting the wider context of the events in that Jews were not a unique subject of persecution and banditry which occurred throughout postwar Europe<ref name=Whitlock/>, misinterpreting or distorting data,<ref name="Gont"/><ref name="Stola"/> relying mostly on Jewish sources,<ref name="Gont"/> using inflammatory and emotional language<ref name=Whitlock/><ref name="Gont"/><ref name="TRad"/> and drawing unsubstantiated conclusions.<ref name="Stola"/><ref name="TRad"/><ref name=Whitlock/><ref name="Choda">]: , ], January 11, 2008 {{en icon}}</ref><ref name="Gont">Piotr Gontarczyk, , ], January 12, 2008 {{en icon}}</ref> ], the president of the ], in an interview with journalist ], stated that ''Fear'' has serious ] errors and omissions, includes emotive use of political ], and therefore does not stand a chance of being accepted (even conditionally) in the historical community.<ref name="Kurtyka">{{pl icon}} Konrad Piasecki, , RMF FM, ] ]</ref> ''Fear'' has caused controversy in Poland (where it was published in 2008). Polish rabbi ] (quoted by German magazine '']'') described the book as unfairly depicting the country as anti-Semitic thus "harming our goal of reconciliation."<ref>Siobhán Dowling. ''Spiegel International''. January 18, 2008.</ref><ref name=Whitlock>Craig Whitlock, , Washington Post Foreign Service, Friday, January 18, 2008; Page A14</ref> Polish historian ] said that Gross had succeeded in stirring up emotions. However, he was doubtful whether the public debate, which he called a media circus, would do much good.{{cn}} ''Fear'' has been criticized by historians such as ],<ref name=Whitlock/> ],<ref name="Gont"/> ],<ref name="TRad"></ref> ],<ref name="Kurtyka"/> ]<ref name="Stola">Dariusz Stolam Review of Fear, in The English Historical Review 2007 CXXII(499):1460-1463; doi:10.1093/ehr/cem344 </ref> and ];<ref name="Choda"/><ref name=Whitlock/> accusing Gross of imperfect ],<ref name="Choda"/><ref name="Gont"/> generalizations,<ref name="Choda"/><ref name="Stola"/> stereotyping,<ref name="Choda"/> ignoring works which did not confirm his views,<ref name="Gont"/> neglecting the wider context of the events in that Jews were not a unique subject of persecution and banditry which occurred throughout postwar Europe<ref name=Whitlock/>, misinterpreting or distorting data,<ref name="Gont"/><ref name="Stola"/> relying mostly on Jewish sources,<ref name="Gont"/> using inflammatory and emotional language<ref name=Whitlock/><ref name="Gont"/><ref name="TRad"/> and drawing unsubstantiated conclusions.<ref name="Stola"/><ref name="TRad"/><ref name=Whitlock/><ref name="Choda">]: , ], January 11, 2008 {{en icon}}</ref><ref name="Gont">Piotr Gontarczyk, , ], January 12, 2008 {{en icon}}</ref> ], the president of the ], in an interview with journalist ], stated that ''Fear'' has serious ] errors and omissions, as well as emotive use of political ], and therefore does not stand a chance of being accepted (even conditionally) in the historical community.<ref name="Kurtyka">{{pl icon}} Konrad Piasecki, , RMF FM, ] ]</ref>


], head of Warsaw's ], criticized Gross for being more of a judge than an analyst, neglecting the impact of the post-war collapse of state institutions, and selectively using facts to support his thesis. Tych also noted, "But after his book, it is no longer possible to escape from the question why there were killings of Jews after the war, and that is is his undeniable achievement."<ref>Beats Pasek. ''Time'', Jan. 23, 2008.</ref> ], head of Warsaw's ], criticized Gross for being more of a judge than an analyst, neglecting the impact of the post-war collapse of state institutions, and selectively using facts to support his thesis.<ref>Beats Pasek. ''Time'', Jan. 23, 2008.</ref>


Polish ] have reviewed the accusations that the book is slanderous against the Polish nation, but rejected the claim, refusing to launch an investigation. The very fact that such requests were made in the first place has become the subject of some additional media controversy. The article of the ] that allowed the case to be made has been criticized by some as infringing upon the right to ] and will be reviewed by the ].<ref>{{pl icon}} Wprost 24</ref> Polish ] reviewed the accusations that the book is slanderous against the Polish nation, but rejected the claim, refusing to launch an investigation. The very fact that such requests were made has become the subject of some additional media controversy. The article of the ] that allowed the case to be made in the first place has been criticized by some as infringing upon the right to ] and will be reviewed by the ].<ref>{{pl icon}} Wprost 24</ref>


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 15:14, 21 May 2008

Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz is a book by Jan T. Gross, published by Random House and Princeton University Press in 2006. A Polish version was published in Krakow as Strach: antysemityzm w Polsce tuż po wojnie: historia moralnej zapaści by Znak Publishers in 2008. Fear is an expansion of themes from his 2001 book Neighbors. In this book, Gross explores the issues concerning incidents of post-war anti-Jewish violence in Poland, with particular focus on the 1946 Kielce pogrom. The book received international attention with reviews in major newspapers, but has also been a subject of much criticism from Polish historians.

Content

In the English version of the book, Gross begins with a chapter illustrating the horrors suffered by Poland during World War II including the physical destruction of Poland's Jews, the initial partition of the country between Stalin and Hitler, the subsequent Nazi crimes and the Katyn massacre of Polish army officers by the Soviets; the Warsaw uprising of 1944, as well as the Soviet decision to postpone their advance until the German army had defeated the Polish Armia Krajowa, which resulted in the destruction of Warsaw "reduced to a pile of rubble." And finally, the abandonment of Poland knowingly consigned to half a century of Soviet communist domination by Britain and America at the Yalta Conference.

Gross estimates that 250,000 Polish Jews returned home at the end of the war. Often, they would find their property occupied by the homeless or taken over by the communist government nationalizing much of the Polish economy. He discusses the alienation, hostile atmosphere and violence experienced by some Jews and the inability of Polish elites to prevent it. Gross makes additional claims about the Kielce pogrom arguing that the crime was initiated not by a mob, but by the police, and involved people from every walk of life except the highest level of government officials in the city (Fear, pp. 83-166).

Gross concludes with the controversial claim that the cause of postwar anti-Semitism in Poland was the presumed wartime participation of selected Poles, especially in rural areas, in the Nazi effort to annihilate and despoil the Jews. The fear of punishment for their own crimes, according to Gross, was what drove them to continue attacking Jews after the war (hence the title of the book).

Differences between the Polish and English edition

The Polish version was different because Gross assumed that his Polish readers were familiar with the tragic history of wartime Poland. The English-version first chapter was replaced by a chapter documenting Polish awareness of the Nazi genocide of the Jews. In particular, Gross makes his Polish readers aware that the Einsatzgruppen rounded up Jewish men, women and children and committed mass murders in "full view" of the Polish population. In a dialogue with Deborah Lipstadt at YIVO on May 8, 2008, Gross stated that he now feels that he should have made a different decision about what to include in the Polish edition.

Reception

United States

Fear received praise in reviews in a number of popular magazines and newspapers including The New York Times (by David Margolick), the Washington Post (by Elie Wiesel), the Boston Globe, the Kirkus Reviews and the Los Angeles Times (by Thane Rosenbaum). Elie Wiesel reviewing the book rejected the notion of collective guilt for all of Poland, but noted that Gross' book impels Poland to confront its past.

The Piast Institute, a Polish-American think tank, held a symposium analyzing Fear and its reception. The symposium concluded that: "Reviewers in major newspapers such as the New York Times, The Baltimore Sun and the Los Angeles Times, none of whom has any expertise in Polish or East Central European history, have reacted to the book with uncritical acclaim and considerable anti-Polish rhetoric. As such, it is clear already that Fear will have a serious and negative effect on Polish-Jewish relations." Wiesel's review was among those that have generated most discussion. The Washington Post reprinted a response by Janusz Reiter, a Polish ambassador to the United States, who cited a well known Polish-Jewish editor and writer Adam Michnik's reply to Wiesel's review. Michnik wrote in a leading Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza that: "Wiesel's review conveys the image of a country unable to confront the plague of anti-Semitism... falsifies – even if unintentionally – the truth about Poland." With regards to Rosenbaum's review Piast Institute concluded that he has "presented the argument in highly emotional and hyperbolic prose and is given to exaggeration...". Piast Institute was critical of the book itself, concluding that "the thesis of the book is highly controversial and many Poles and others also find it unfair and tendentious".

In Poland

Fear has caused controversy in Poland (where it was published in 2008). Polish rabbi Burt Schuman (quoted by German magazine Der Spiegel) described the book as unfairly depicting the country as anti-Semitic thus "harming our goal of reconciliation." Polish historian Andrzej Paczkowski said that Gross had succeeded in stirring up emotions. However, he was doubtful whether the public debate, which he called a media circus, would do much good. Fear has been criticized by historians such as Paweł Machcewicz, Piotr Gontarczyk, Thaddeus Radzilowski, Janusz Kurtyka, Dariusz Stola and Marek Jan Chodakiewicz; accusing Gross of imperfect methodology, generalizations, stereotyping, ignoring works which did not confirm his views, neglecting the wider context of the events in that Jews were not a unique subject of persecution and banditry which occurred throughout postwar Europe, misinterpreting or distorting data, relying mostly on Jewish sources, using inflammatory and emotional language and drawing unsubstantiated conclusions. Janusz Kurtyka, the president of the Institute of National Remembrance, in an interview with journalist Konrad Piasecki, stated that Fear has serious methodological errors and omissions, as well as emotive use of political epithets, and therefore does not stand a chance of being accepted (even conditionally) in the historical community.

Feliks Tych, head of Warsaw's Jewish Historical Institute, criticized Gross for being more of a judge than an analyst, neglecting the impact of the post-war collapse of state institutions, and selectively using facts to support his thesis.

Polish prosecutors reviewed the accusations that the book is slanderous against the Polish nation, but rejected the claim, refusing to launch an investigation. The very fact that such requests were made has become the subject of some additional media controversy. The article of the Polish law that allowed the case to be made in the first place has been criticized by some as infringing upon the right to free speech and will be reviewed by the Polish Constitutional Court.

See also

Citations

  1. ^ Symposium: Analysis of Fear - Summary of the Essay
  2. ^ Piotr Gontarczyk, Far From Truth, Rzeczpospolita, January 12, 2008 Template:En icon
  3. Jan T. Gross. Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz. An Essay in Historical Interpretation. New York, Random House, 2006. Quoted in: David Engel, On Continuity and Discontinuity in Polish-Jewish Relations: Observations on Fear: Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz—An Essay in Historical Interpretation by Jan T. Gross. New York: Random House, 2006, East European Politics & Societies, Vol. 21, No. 3, 534-548 (2007)
  4. David Margolick. Postwar Pogrom. The New York Times, July 23, 2006
  5. Elie Wiesel. The Killing After The Killing. The Washington Post, June 25, 2006.
  6. Susan Rubin Suleiman. Aftershocks. The Boston Globe, July 02, 2006
  7. Kirkus Reviews 74.9 (May 1, 2006): p448(1).
  8. Thane Rosenbaum, "A Lethal Homecoming" (pdf), book review of Fear, Los Angeles Times, June 25, 2006.
  9. Elie Wiesel. The Killing After The Killing. The Washington Post, June 25, 2006.
  10. Symposium: Analysis of Fear - Introduction
  11. JANUSZ REITER Washington Post July 9th, 2006
  12. Analysis of Thane Rosenbaum's Review of FEAR
  13. Symposium: Analysis of Fear - Symposium's Purpose
  14. Siobhán Dowling. Fear and Slander in Poland. Anti-Semitism Book Could Land Historian in Jail. Spiegel International. January 18, 2008.
  15. ^ Craig Whitlock, A Scholar's Legal Peril in Poland, Washington Post Foreign Service, Friday, January 18, 2008; Page A14
  16. ^ THADDEUS RADZILOWSKI, Review of FEAR
  17. ^ Template:Pl icon Konrad Piasecki, "Gross to wampir historiografii," interview with historian Janusz Kurtyka, RMF FM, 10 January 2008
  18. ^ Dariusz Stolam Review of Fear, in The English Historical Review 2007 CXXII(499):1460-1463; doi:10.1093/ehr/cem344
  19. ^ Marek Jan Chodakiewicz: People’s past has to be reviewed critically on individual basis, Rzeczpospolita, January 11, 2008 Template:En icon
  20. Beats Pasek. Confronting Poland's Anti-Semitic Demons. Time, Jan. 23, 2008.
  21. Template:Pl icon Nie będzie śledztwa ws. książki Grossa Wprost 24

Further reading

  • David Engel, On Continuity and Discontinuity in Polish-Jewish Relations: Observations on Fear: Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz—An Essay in Historical Interpretation by Jan T. Gross. New York: Random House, 2006, East European Politics & Societies, Vol. 21, No. 3, 534-548 (2007),

Externa links

Categories: