Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Eye movement in ordinary tasks: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:52, 21 May 2008 edit67.170.13.119 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:52, 21 May 2008 edit undoWillOakland (talk | contribs)2,848 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
*I plan to add other examples to add to this article. I had already added one (eye movements in walking), but this was deleted without apparent reason. *I plan to add other examples to add to this article. I had already added one (eye movements in walking), but this was deleted without apparent reason.
I originally planned to add articles on eye-movements in language reading, in stress situations, in in chess - translated and adapted from my publication Hans-Werner Hunziker, (2006) Im Auge des Lesers: foveale und periphere Wahrnehmung - vom Buchstabieren zur Lesefreude Transmedia Stäubli Verlag Zürich 2006 ISBN 978-3-7266-0068-6. Now I do not know if this is against Misplaced Pages standards even if I cite the original sources on which the articles in my book are based. Maybe someone can help me with this. Thanks.--] (]) 10:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC) I originally planned to add articles on eye-movements in language reading, in stress situations, in in chess - translated and adapted from my publication Hans-Werner Hunziker, (2006) Im Auge des Lesers: foveale und periphere Wahrnehmung - vom Buchstabieren zur Lesefreude Transmedia Stäubli Verlag Zürich 2006 ISBN 978-3-7266-0068-6. Now I do not know if this is against Misplaced Pages standards even if I cite the original sources on which the articles in my book are based. Maybe someone can help me with this. Thanks.--] (]) 10:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
*:After reading that I still do not understand what the ''scope'' of this article is. ] (]) 22:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC) *:After reading that I still do not understand what the ''scope'' of this article is. ] (]) 22:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Original research. ] (]) 01:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. Original research. ] (]) 01:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:52, 21 May 2008

Eye movement in ordinary tasks

Eye movement in ordinary tasks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Prod declined by author; escalating to next deletion step. Strange history - author originally cited his/her own work, then changed it. Too specific of an article title/subject with little supporting text - article consists of pictures and explanations. Probably WP:COPYVIO of new cited paper, but hard to tell as it's in German. Tan | 39 21:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete - I'm not against foreign languages, but the salient points of this article are in German and aren't really of use to an English reader. Perhaps an article from the German Misplaced Pages needs to be translated?  Frank  |  talk  22:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, short and insufficient context. WillOakland (talk) 22:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • I plan to add other examples to add to this article. I had already added one (eye movements in walking), but this was deleted without apparent reason.

I originally planned to add articles on eye-movements in language reading, in stress situations, in in chess - translated and adapted from my publication Hans-Werner Hunziker, (2006) Im Auge des Lesers: foveale und periphere Wahrnehmung - vom Buchstabieren zur Lesefreude Transmedia Stäubli Verlag Zürich 2006 ISBN 978-3-7266-0068-6. Now I do not know if this is against Misplaced Pages standards even if I cite the original sources on which the articles in my book are based. Maybe someone can help me with this. Thanks.--Hans-Werner34 (talk) 10:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Categories: