Revision as of 19:33, 22 May 2008 edit86.29.142.126 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:44, 22 May 2008 edit undoTenPoundHammer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers278,926 edits →User:WilliamKF reported by 86.29.142.126 (Result: ): rNext edit → | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
*Diff of 3RR warning: | *Diff of 3RR warning: | ||
{{helpme|Can you copy and paste the section above onto ]. By the way he started the reverting!}} | {{tnull|helpme|Can you copy and paste the section above onto ]. By the way he started the reverting!}} | ||
*I don't think that's how things work around here. Wait for an admin to review your unblock request, then talk it over with them. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 19:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{unblock|He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE ]! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!?}} | {{unblock|He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE ]! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!?}} |
Revision as of 19:44, 22 May 2008
May 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Template:Pirates. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rehevkor (talk) 18:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -LtNOWIS (talk) 19:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
User:WilliamKF reported by 86.29.142.126 (Result: )
- Three-revert rule violation on User talk:86.29.142.126 (edit | ] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). NAME_OF_USER (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 19:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme|Can you copy and paste the section above onto here. By the way he started the reverting!}}
- I don't think that's how things work around here. Wait for an admin to review your unblock request, then talk it over with them. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 19:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
86.29.142.126 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed comments! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!?Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE ]! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!? |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE ]! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE ]! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}