Misplaced Pages

User talk:86.29.142.126: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:44, 22 May 2008 editTenPoundHammer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers278,910 edits →User:WilliamKF reported by 86.29.142.126 (Result: ): r← Previous edit Revision as of 19:48, 22 May 2008 edit undoNetsnipe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions22,296 edits unblock DECLINEDNext edit →
Line 31: Line 31:
*I don't think that's how things work around here. Wait for an admin to review your unblock request, then talk it over with them. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 19:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC) *I don't think that's how things work around here. Wait for an admin to review your unblock request, then talk it over with them. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 19:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


{{unblock|He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE ]! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!?}} {{unblock reviewed|He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE ]! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!?|decline=. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 19:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 19:48, 22 May 2008

May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Template:Pirates. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rehevkor (talk) 18:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -LtNOWIS (talk) 19:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

User:WilliamKF reported by 86.29.142.126 (Result: )

  • Previous version reverted to:


  • 1st revert:
  • 2nd revert:
  • 3rd revert:
  • 4th revert:
  • 5th revert:
  • 6th revert:
  • 7th revert:
  • Diff of 3RR warning:

{{helpme|Can you copy and paste the section above onto here. By the way he started the reverting!}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.29.142.126 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed comments! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!?

Decline reason:

Good bye. --  Netsnipe  ►  19:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.