| Revision as of 19:48, 22 May 2008 editNetsnipe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions22,296 edits unblock DECLINED← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:57, 22 May 2008 edit undo86.29.142.126 (talk) asseholeNext edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE ]! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!?|decline=. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 19:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE ]! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!?|decline=. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 19:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)}} | ||
| Argh, you assehole. Not only did you give a stupid reason like "Good bye", but you linked to that page. I'm using Firefox and the moment and I had to Ctrl Alt Delete it, losing all of the webpages I was on at the time! Administrators aren's supposed to act in such an immature manor! You think this is funny? | |||
Revision as of 19:57, 22 May 2008
May 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Template:Pirates. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rehevkor (talk) 18:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -LtNOWIS (talk) 19:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
User:WilliamKF reported by 86.29.142.126 (Result: )
- Three-revert rule violation on User talk:86.29.142.126 (edit | ] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). NAME_OF_USER (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 19:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme|Can you copy and paste the section above onto here. By the way he started the reverting!}}
- I don't think that's how things work around here. Wait for an admin to review your unblock request, then talk it over with them. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 19:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
86.29.142.126 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
He was reverting something which I'm allowed to do! SEE Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed comments! When I put a notice about it on his talk page someone removes it?!?
Decline reason:
Good bye. -- Netsnipe ► 19:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Argh, you assehole. Not only did you give a stupid reason like "Good bye", but you linked to that page. I'm using Firefox and the moment and I had to Ctrl Alt Delete it, losing all of the webpages I was on at the time! Administrators aren's supposed to act in such an immature manor! You think this is funny?