Misplaced Pages

In Search of the Cradle of Civilization: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:27, 25 May 2008 edit99.242.56.77 (talk) Criticism← Previous edit Revision as of 16:27, 25 May 2008 edit undo99.242.56.77 (talk) ContentNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''In Search of the Cradle of Civilization: New Light on Ancient India''''' is a ] book by ], ], and ] that argues against the theories that Indo-European peoples arrived in India in the middle of the second millennium BC (]) and supports the notion of "]". Published by Quest Books, a branch of the ]. '''''In Search of the Cradle of Civilization: New Light on Ancient India''''' is a ] book by ], ], and ] that argues against the theories that Indo-European peoples arrived in India in the middle of the second millennium BC (]) and supports the notion of "]". Published by Quest Books, a branch of the ].


radle of Civilization |work=Quest Books |publisher= The Theosophical Publishing House}}</ref>.
==Content==
Contradicting early ] views, the authors argue that ] grew out of the "Indus-Sarasvati civilization", or ]. The authors enumerate fifteen arguments for their revisionist views. Several of these arguments emphasize ], ], cultural, ], and ] continuity between Harappan culture, the ], and post-Vedic ]. They also argue that it is improbable that the Vedas were the product of a ] or semi-nomadic group. Early opinion considered the ] as containing memories of an earlier nomadic period, whilst the later ] were the product of a society native to India. The authors argue that this early viewpoint of the ] is based on mistaken and speculative interpretations, and that in actuality the ] also describes society native to India.

The authors leave open the view that ] is the '']'' (original homeland) of the ] (the "]"), saying that "the ]s could just as well have been native to India for several millennia, deriving their ]ic language from earlier Indo-European dialects."

The authors find continuity in Indian spiritual and religious artifacts from ], one of the first cities in the world, to the present. It should be noted that ] does not rule out elements of cultural continuity in spite of language change, so that such claims, likewise, are not in conflict with mainstream opinion. In the view of the authors, however, this alleged continuity rules out the later influx of another ethnic group.

New age writer ] hailed the book as "ground-breaking"<ref>{{citeweb|url=http://www.questbooks.net/title.cfm?bookid=246 In Search of the Cradle of Civilization|title=In Search of the Cradle of Civilization |work=Quest Books |publisher= The Theosophical Publishing House}}</ref>.


sdsd sdsd

Revision as of 16:27, 25 May 2008

In Search of the Cradle of Civilization: New Light on Ancient India is a 1995 book by Georg Feuerstein, Subhash Kak, and David Frawley that argues against the theories that Indo-European peoples arrived in India in the middle of the second millennium BC (Indo-Aryan migration) and supports the notion of "Indigenous Aryans". Published by Quest Books, a branch of the Theosophical Society in America.

radle of Civilization |work=Quest Books |publisher= The Theosophical Publishing House}}</ref>.

sdsd

Bibliographic information

See also

Notes

References

  • Meera Nanda (2003). Prophets Facing Backward: Postmodern Critiques of Science and Hindu Nationalism in India. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 0813533589.
  • Alan Sokal, 'Pseudoscience and Postmodernism: Antagonists or Fellow-Travelers?' in: Garrett G. Fagan (2006). Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public. Routledge. ISBN 0415305934.
Categories: