| Revision as of 23:13, 25 May 2008 editJohn Vandenberg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users68,507 edits stop this nonsense← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:43, 26 May 2008 edit undoJohn Vandenberg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users68,507 edits a query from the saneNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :::You're trying to make a ], aren't you? I'm not positive ''what'' point, but you seem to be making one. ] (]) 23:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | :::You're trying to make a ], aren't you? I'm not positive ''what'' point, but you seem to be making one. ] (]) 23:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::Obviously not irrelevant :- Two separate editors have reverted you so if you wish to continue this campaign, please do so by initiating discussion at ], or raise your concerns with myself (the case clerk) either ] or on my ]. Rather than protect the Evidence page as , I will block this IP if the disruption continues. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 23:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | :::Obviously not irrelevant :- Two separate editors have reverted you so if you wish to continue this campaign, please do so by initiating discussion at ], or raise your concerns with myself (the case clerk) either ] or on my ]. Rather than protect the Evidence page as , I will block this IP if the disruption continues. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 23:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Which part of the evidence page do you believe is problematic, taking into account our norms for Arbitration evidence pages? <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 03:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:43, 26 May 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV/Evidence, you will be blocked from editing. Ashton1983 (talk) 15:59, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- That's an interesting point, but if we started applying WP:BLP to the free discussion of editor's behavior, we'd get nothing else done. -- Kendrick7 17:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. WP:BLP requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal.
- You're trying to make a WP:POINT, aren't you? I'm not positive what point, but you seem to be making one. *Dan T.* (talk) 23:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Obviously not irrelevant :- Two separate editors have reverted you so if you wish to continue this campaign, please do so by initiating discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV/Evidence, or raise your concerns with myself (the case clerk) either privately or on my Jayvdb. Rather than protect the Evidence page as requested, I will block this IP if the disruption continues. John Vandenberg 23:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. WP:BLP requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal.
Which part of the evidence page do you believe is problematic, taking into account our norms for Arbitration evidence pages? John Vandenberg 03:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)