| Revision as of 01:15, 22 August 2005 editDreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 edits →[]: reply to editor who has he nerve to whine← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:30, 22 August 2005 edit undoJtdirl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,275 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
| :No... the problem here is that '''you''' never stop... you created a duplicate section in an article you made without checking to see if other articles already existed. You insisted upon linking your version as the supposed "main article". You gave the article an inaccurate title. You didn;t respond to talk page comments placed there a long time ago. You didn't check to make sure that the link was still accurate. And you still don;t understand that "urban myths" is not a real phrase. And you do all this without trying to discuss the issue at all, just blindly reverting things back to your way, making false accusations, failing to read the edit comments, and then complaining as if you were the one bein put upon. If you had simply read the comments on your article talk page, or the edit comments, or made talk page comments of your own, you could have avoided this. You didn't... and after all that you filed a false 3RR charge. So please stop your bellyaching, learn how to work with other editors, read up on policies and learn to follow them. ] 01:15, August 22, 2005 (UTC) | :No... the problem here is that '''you''' never stop... you created a duplicate section in an article you made without checking to see if other articles already existed. You insisted upon linking your version as the supposed "main article". You gave the article an inaccurate title. You didn;t respond to talk page comments placed there a long time ago. You didn't check to make sure that the link was still accurate. And you still don;t understand that "urban myths" is not a real phrase. And you do all this without trying to discuss the issue at all, just blindly reverting things back to your way, making false accusations, failing to read the edit comments, and then complaining as if you were the one bein put upon. If you had simply read the comments on your article talk page, or the edit comments, or made talk page comments of your own, you could have avoided this. You didn't... and after all that you filed a false 3RR charge. So please stop your bellyaching, learn how to work with other editors, read up on policies and learn to follow them. ] 01:15, August 22, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| I see what you mean, Slim! Why does Misplaced Pages attract such people??? I've spent tonight dealing with a banned nutter waging war on Misplaced Pages with his bunch of sockpuppets. Sometimes it seems like Nutter Central!!! lol. No wonder DreamGuy (God knows whose dream???) has that reputation. ]]\<sup><font color=blue>] 01:30, 22 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==FoC, again and again== | ==FoC, again and again== | ||
Revision as of 01:30, 22 August 2005
| Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing. — Jimbo Wales |
snow-coat.jpg) Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper. — Robert Frost
Stormfront and wikipedia.See this thread Homey 22:20, 19 August 2005 (UTC) BTW, I think congratulations are in order. (From the aforementioned thread):
Two things.One, that you blocked User:Coqsportif warrants an unspoken barnstar for protecting Wikipeida from those using it as a playground. Two, do the the bluebonnets on your User page indicate your being a Texan, or is it just a pretty photo? Shem 22:53, 19 August 2005 (UTC) 1948 Arab-Israeli WarPlease dont blanket revert without seeing Talk page first. 62.252.0.7 10:03, 20 August 2005 (UTC) Arbitration noticeNotice posted here. Rangerdude 18:58, 20 August 2005 (UTC) different ArbitrationI have put DreamGuy up for arbitratioon for incivillity. addevidance at your convieniance, or just repair my formatting if it suits youGavin the Chosen 02:34, 21 August 2005 (UTC) by the way, cute puppy on the picture here, is it yours?Gavin the Chosen 02:34, 21 August 2005 (UTC) ComplimentYou're hypercool. You make me want to be a better person. Thanks :) --noösfractal 03:47, 21 August 2005 (UTC) user hipocriteis it possible to explain to that user that being polite is kind of paramount, and ordering other people around is not assuming good faith or polite in any way? i am growing impatient with that users lack of decorum.Gavin the Chosen 04:00, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
FOCIt's been a long time but he's back. Judging from the amount of crap he spews we ALL have a good idea that he's not editing in good faith, so I'm wondering if I can simply treat all his edits as vandalisms (since they've been systematically disproven) an revert them on the spot. It's very difficult to work within the 3RR system while he games it by using anon IPs. -Hmib 05:57, 21 August 2005 (UTC) RE:3RRMy first edit at 20:19, 20 August 2005 was not a revert. I deleted the personal attack against Ishihara which got mixed in to the bigger conflict, which was the sangokujin and apology statement issue. My reverts from there on were to that version, without the personal attack on Ishihara. If you look my my contribs, or the history page on Ishihara, my edits on that article were, from latest to earliest,
not what FoC had on the complaint page. FoC wanted to redefine sangokujin using his version of the word, which is not found on the actual page on sangokujin on wikipedia. Also, he added that Ishihara apologised, without providing any proof whatsoever that he did. -Hmib 20:33, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
SlimVirgin, don't believe Hmib. I have never said or written or spoken that Ishihara apologised anything. For "sangokujin," his edit is completely wrong. I looked up a Japanese dictionary that is the same explanation of mine. He cannot speak Japanese so I'm wondering where dis he get that idea from. I don't know because he has never cited his source. Also, I told Hmib that his edition is insulting and unencyclopedic but he does not listen anything. Flowerofchivalry 21:09, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Thank you for your valuable comment. All of my edits are based on credible sources, but I will try to cite the sources more clearly than before. The edition you quoted above is based on here. This page is in Japanese but this website is the first source because they write down everything he said on press release. His reverts violates 3RR as I showed. I would like to ask you to take appropriate action. Flowerofchivalry 22:04, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
--Flowerofchivalry 22:26, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Celebration! Please join me in celebrating my 1000th edit at Misplaced Pages, the most important online information resource! Hamster Sandwich 21:46, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Prince Albert Victor, Duke of ClarenceWhy did you go in and restore the link to a section of an article that was a fork file for an already existing article? Once they go to that one it just says there to go to the other one for more info, so it ends up being a wasted link. DreamGuy 22:31, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
I see what you mean, Slim! Why does Misplaced Pages attract such people??? I've spent tonight dealing with a banned nutter waging war on Misplaced Pages with his bunch of sockpuppets. Sometimes it seems like Nutter Central!!! lol. No wonder DreamGuy (God knows whose dream???) has that reputation. FearÉIREANN FoC, again and againHi Slim, I just wanted to thank you for your patience with FoC. Even though there really is no point in listening to anything he says you went beyond your call of duty and tried to resolve conflicts. Though given the extremist agenda FoC wants to push onto wikipedia, I'm afraid your patience would wear thin too, sooner or later. Well, just saying you have my thanks. -Hmib 22:44, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Coqsportif
VandalBlack Scorpion (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) See contribs --Kim Nevelsteen 00:25, 22 August 2005 (UTC) |
