Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 13:16, 22 August 2005

Able Danger/Weldon

I may have mis-read the Able Danger article. In 1999 Steinberg was the Deputy NSA. The way I read the article was Weldon gave the chart/document to the Deputy NSA in 1999.

If am wrong, please correct it.

Thanks.

No problem, I messed up there too, I was laughing to hard, I think the current version is right. Unfortunately Weldon is a jackass, it would be really nice if he was right but Able Danger never had the type of data needed to make that sort of result, it was a few people and they were in their first year, they didn't have time to gather the data. --Gorgonzilla 04:08, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Sheehan

Right you are. You watch the page for such deletions when I'm not, and I'll do the same. Badagnani 15:46, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Some day the wingnuts on the left and the right will realize that Drudge, O'Reily and Moore are only three examples of the same types of asshole. Most of the POV edits people put into wiki are actually counterproductive to their cause. I removed about 80% of the Able Danger article, the result was much punchier than the original whacko-conspiracist version. They didn't like it. --Gorgonzilla 15:59, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Take your money and shove it=my bad

Hello Gorgonzilla I'm the bad little monkey who used that naughty phrase.

Before you started working on Abramoff & Co. I estimate I contributed 80% of all info about him found on Misplaced Pages.

I am glad someone else is now working on it as I have a hard time not hating him.

I am willing to post links in Jack Abramoff's discussion area if you are willing to make the info they contain wikipedia friendly.

Sound good?

... Abramoff is facing indictment for major frauds from four separate grand juries and is a suspect in the murder of one of the people who accused him, what is there not to hate? I don't think that there are many pro-Abramoff people, he has been abandonded by his party. But just make sure the article looks reasonably NPOV. --Gorgonzilla 23:31, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedians for indecency

I'll certainly join that project :-). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 00:55, 2005 August 20 (UTC)

Erwin Walsh's RfC

I've noticed you've had quite a few run-ins with Erwin Walsh. I'm opened a RfC against him. You can find it here. Since a lot of my evidence is related to conflicts you've had with him, I ask that you please endorse the RfC, and, if possible, contribute more information to it. Acetic Acid 05:36, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. Your summary sounds a lot better than mine did. I ask that you please sign where it says "Users certifying the basis for this dispute" part. If someone doesn't sign in the next 24 hours, the RfC will be rejected. Acetic Acid 04:09, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

Indefensible behavior

There was a time when one of you could have said that you're defending yourself from the other, but at this point both you and Agriculture are being puerile and are violating WP:Civility and WP:NPA. The comments that I've seen at Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency and on your respective talk pages are over the line. I strongly suggest that you take an extended break from Misplaced Pages and get some perspective. You are both good editors and it would be a waste if one or both of you got an extended block over this. Fernando Rizo T/C 22:49, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

• I've responded to your reply to the above statement on my talk page. Fernando Rizo T/C 01:21, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

the return of the bad monkey

greetings Gorgonzilla I'm trying to split the kkk page into three new pages plus the original but "people" keep thinkging I'm vandalizing the page because I have a slow computer. Any ideas?