| Revision as of 10:39, 2 June 2008 editXandar (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers6,203 edits →Oppose← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:55, 2 June 2008 edit undoKaranacs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users27,644 edits →Oppose: remove premature opposition; note left on user's talk page with explanationNext edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| =====Oppose===== | =====Oppose===== | ||
| # | |||
| # I don't think Karanacs is good administrator material. She made repeated false accusations of plagiarism and "lifting" material, against editors in public on the May RCC FAC discussion page. When it was shown that plagiarism was not what had occurred, since the material that she highlighted was well, (indeed, over-) referenced, and there was clearly no intention of stealing intellectual property, there was no response. Since then, despite requests, karanacs has made no attempt whatsoever to withdraw her comments, privately or publicly, and apologise. This is not the sort of conduct I would wish to see in a WP admin. ] (]) 10:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| =====Neutral===== | =====Neutral===== | ||
Revision as of 12:55, 2 June 2008
Karanacs
Voice your opinion (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 20:23, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Karanacs (talk · contribs) - I know RFA nominations from me are rare as hen's teeth, and the only editor I have nominated was shot down in a fairly spectacular fireball — but that said, I'd still like to nominate Karanacs for your consideration. I freely admit to not having heard of her until a month ago, when I was asking round looking for new admin material and her name was suggested to me. Having spent a fair while looking over her history, I'm honoured to be the one to suggest her for the mop, as well as surprised she hasn't been put forward before.
All the "doesn't need the tools" opposers may as well get their opposes in now, as she certainly doesn't fit the "traditional" admin candidate pattern. Hardly any discussions at AfD; no posts to AIV; never been a regular hanger-outer at WT:RFA, ANI or any of the other places wannabes are expected to hang out. To me, that's a positive, not a negative; she's an editor who realises that without content, Misplaced Pages is just Facebook for ugly people, and works steadily and unobtrusively to keep our content the best on the net. (But she's not exclusively a denizen of the mainspace; she has over 4000 non-mainspace edits, spread across all kinds of nooks and corners.)
She is, in my opinion, someone who may not need the tools, but would find them more useful than most, and has more than adequately demonstrated her trustworthiness. Her deleted contributions show a consistent well-judged use of CSD and PROD. She has maintained a steady flow of quality mainspace contributions for well over a year (including some mammoth articles on the history & institutions of Texas), and has a superlative record at pulling almost-there articles through the GA/FA hoops. Her talk/user talk edits show a consistent pattern of being able to collaborate, discuss and improve without once (that I can find) getting stroppy or arrogant, or even getting into an argument (aside from this storm in a teacup, in which I can't find her putting a word out of place). The ability to view deleted articles would be invaluable to a user like this who spends so much time putting individual stub-petals together to make article-flowers; the ability to block would be useful to anyone working on the vandalism-magnet US history articles in which she works (as I know to my cost, since Davy Crockett somehow found its way onto my watchlist), and I'd trust her entirely to use the delete button appropriately. More to the point, while she might not plan to do a lot of admin-drudgery, we have here a demonstrably committed and trustworthy editor who's willing to help where she can, and I think whatever help someone as good as this wants to give should be welcomed with open arms. — iridescent 20:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A:
- 2. What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
General comments
- Links for Karanacs: Karanacs (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Karanacs before commenting.