| Revision as of 10:09, 6 June 2008 editRlevse (talk | contribs)93,195 edits →Formal notice: tweak← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:05, 6 June 2008 edit undoMoldopodo (talk | contribs)2,113 edits →BlockedNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=and the diff with due explanation are.... absent?|decline=Not a request, and there is a link. ] 22:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|1=and the diff with due explanation are.... absent?|decline=Not a request, and there is a link. ] 22:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)}} | ||
| {{unblock|I request to have an explanation of the block with the proper justification providing a diff. I also would like to know what this ] kind of explanation is? Also why it is allowed for an administrator ] to be obviously uncivil in my regard and how my edits are considered uncivil when no diff is presented b the blocking admin to justify his/her decision? Also, please, could you pexplain me, as per administrators' discussion board, how did the name of the section "Accusation of canvassing by ] disappeared? Looks like I am the only one who provides diffs and justifications here. Is this a new rule on Misplaced Pages?}} | |||
| See ] ] <small>]</small> 01:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | See ] ] <small>]</small> 01:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:05, 6 June 2008
If you want to leave a message,
you can just click here!
You can also send me an e-mail.
Your Userpage/AN
I'm glad I was able to help out, even if only a little bit. It did end up to be a productive discussion, I think, and I hope it proves useful in the future. As for your userpage, it appears to have been protected in December by User:Nick, citing privacy concerns (diff). I've unprotected the page, so you should have no further problems editing it. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Best, UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 16:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, really. Unfortunately, so far this discussion is productive only with you, independently from the fact whether you agree or not with me - at least there is an exchange of explanations between two human beings, which is generally called communication. It's amazing to have so many other users privileged with rights of administrators who still do not have anything to say, nor to explain.--Moldopodo 16:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Moldovan-Ukrainian relations
I think I see what happened here. You started an article at Moldavian-Ukrainian relations, which Flueras redirected to an identical article at Moldovan-Ukrainian relations, claiming that Moldovan is the correct term. I don't know which is which, so I can't speak to the name issue - but would that article (which looks substantially like the version you had before it was redirected, thus), work for your planned expansion? UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 18:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- It looks like Flueras was blocked as a sock of Bonaparte. FYI. UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 19:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 21:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Moldopodo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
and the diff with due explanation are.... absent?
Decline reason:
Not a request, and there is a link. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 22:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Moldopodo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.Change
{{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
See Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#User:Moldopodo.2C_again ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Formal notice
See Digwuren restriction and Digwuren warning. Cease making any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, especially in East European related articles or you will be subject to said restrictions. While I know you were alreayd listed there, thought I'd remind you. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:07, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Category: