| Revision as of 19:20, 7 June 2008 editKelly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,890 edits warning - removal of PUI notices← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:28, 7 June 2008 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| I see you restored ], saying we should keep a local copy. I'm trying to wrap my mind around the various Misplaced Pages image issues and this was a new one to me. Would you mind enlightening me on the advantages of having a local copy of an image that exists on Commons?--<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype">] ''(])''</span> 04:35, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | I see you restored ], saying we should keep a local copy. I'm trying to wrap my mind around the various Misplaced Pages image issues and this was a new one to me. Would you mind enlightening me on the advantages of having a local copy of an image that exists on Commons?--<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype">] ''(])''</span> 04:35, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :That makes sense - thanks. Though I sometimes work the on-Commons backlog, I'm skeptical of the real benefit of those deletions. If the deleted local version is still available on the server, we can't be saving much space or processing power.--<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype">] ''(])''</span> 04:52, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | :That makes sense - thanks. Though I sometimes work the on-Commons backlog, I'm skeptical of the real benefit of those deletions. If the deleted local version is still available on the server, we can't be saving much space or processing power.--<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype">] ''(])''</span> 04:52, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Re == | |||
| I replied at my talk page. I don't want to nag, but I noticed you deleted my question about improper deletions at Commons. I understand you may be annoyed with me for questioning the copyright on your uploads, but I was really hoping you could answer that...it's a serious allegation. Or were you incorrect? ] <sup>]</sup> 17:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Just as a quick question, were you planning to address the copyright issues ? I noticed that you deleted the notice with no reply. I'd be happy to work with you, but if the answer is "no", I'll start tagging them immediately. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Bad fair use of ]== | |||
| ]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|] (] '''·''' ]),}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] is an image with a clearly invalid fair use tag; or it is an image that fails some part of the ] and the uploader has been given 48 hours' notification (for images uploaded after ]) or seven days' notification (for images uploaded before that date). (]).<br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at ]. Feel free to contact the ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click ''' ] (]) 17:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Second warning == | |||
| Once again, please stop removing deletion/discussion templates from images you uploaded yourself, as you did . Instead, please discuss at the appropriate page. I see that you are a longtime user and administrator, you should be perfectly aware of these policies. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:28, 7 June 2008
| War on Bad Writing 1. There is no such word as "incivil." You can be uncivil, and you can be accused of incivility, but you cannot be incivil. 2. There is definitely no such word as "definately." |
 | |||
|
|
No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online |
Why local?
Hi SlimVirgin,
I see you restored Image:Zigong People's Park Zoo.jpg, saying we should keep a local copy. I'm trying to wrap my mind around the various Misplaced Pages image issues and this was a new one to me. Would you mind enlightening me on the advantages of having a local copy of an image that exists on Commons?--Kubigula (talk) 04:35, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- That makes sense - thanks. Though I sometimes work the on-Commons backlog, I'm skeptical of the real benefit of those deletions. If the deleted local version is still available on the server, we can't be saving much space or processing power.--Kubigula (talk) 04:52, 7 June 2008 (UTC)