Misplaced Pages

User:Gnixon/Intelligent design RfC: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Gnixon Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:56, 9 June 2008 editAli'i (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,404 edits →Workspace: SA← Previous edit Revision as of 17:29, 9 June 2008 edit undoOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →Workspace: AddingNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:


:I'm not exactly sure what this page is supposed to be used for (or if I should post this here), but I concur wholeheartedly. --] 16:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC) :I'm not exactly sure what this page is supposed to be used for (or if I should post this here), but I concur wholeheartedly. --] 16:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

#All statements in the ] article require ] using ].
#Reliable sources should be from peer-reviewed and notable secondary sources.
#Intelligent design is a ].

] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 17:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:29, 9 June 2008


Workspace

  1. Misplaced Pages is a mainstream encyclopedia.
  2. Intelligent Design is a neo-creationist propaganda piece meant to sew doubt about neo-Darwinian evolution simply because certain religious folks are opposed to neo-Darwinian evolution for religious reasons. However, in a secular environment such as education or academia, religious objections are ignored. So Intelligent Design was invented to reposition the arguments of the religious fanatics with a veneer of secularism.
  3. Those who believe that Intelligent Design represents a legitimate research program are in defiance with the reliable sources on the subject.
  4. The Intelligent Design article represents some of the best work on a fringe subject ever attempted.

ScienceApologist (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not exactly sure what this page is supposed to be used for (or if I should post this here), but I concur wholeheartedly. --Ali'i 16:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  1. All statements in the Intelligent Design article require verification using reliable sources.
  2. Reliable sources should be from peer-reviewed and notable secondary sources.
  3. Intelligent design is a fringe theory.

OrangeMarlin 17:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)