Revision as of 05:39, 10 June 2008 editMrg3105 (talk | contribs)15,276 edits →Indo-European invasion section: new section← Previous edit |
Revision as of 06:05, 10 June 2008 edit undoBloodofox (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,806 edits →Indo-European invasion section: References.Next edit → |
Line 21: |
Line 21: |
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what Dumézil is on about with the "Middle-Eastern migration". However, because Lindow mentions vanir exhibiting incestuous practices, to identify them as a historical people all one needs to do is find such practices in European history. So far as I'm aware, the only populations to exhibit this was the archaic Hellenic tribes, but they are somewhat out of the way in Scandinavia, and also separated by about a millennia of history--] (]) ♠<font color="#BB0000">♥</font><font color="#BB0000">♦</font>♣ 05:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
I have no idea what Dumézil is on about with the "Middle-Eastern migration". However, because Lindow mentions vanir exhibiting incestuous practices, to identify them as a historical people all one needs to do is find such practices in European history. So far as I'm aware, the only populations to exhibit this was the archaic Hellenic tribes, but they are somewhat out of the way in Scandinavia, and also separated by about a millennia of history--] (]) ♠<font color="#BB0000">♥</font><font color="#BB0000">♦</font>♣ 05:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==References== |
|
|
Brought over from : |
|
|
<blockquote> |
|
|
Hi. I'm no expert on the subject, but it seems to me that such an important part of the eda needs to be far more sourced then just the four you have there. Maybe I have high standards, but I see at least three different sources for each section in any article as a minimum. Also, the images seem very modern depictions of the subject.--] (]) ♠<font color="#BB0000">♥</font><font color="#BB0000">♦</font>♣ 22:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
</blockquote> |
|
|
There are three primary sources here: the Poetic Edda, Prose Edda, and ''Heimskringla''. The references in these sections are all translations and, when there's anything more than a direct translation, it's directly sourced. I don't see why we would need reference tags from multiple translations for a few stanzas - the article is pretty air-tight in terms of references. If you can spot a point where it's not, please point it out. ] (]) 06:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC) |
I have no idea what Dumézil is on about with the "Middle-Eastern migration". However, because Lindow mentions vanir exhibiting incestuous practices, to identify them as a historical people all one needs to do is find such practices in European history. So far as I'm aware, the only populations to exhibit this was the archaic Hellenic tribes, but they are somewhat out of the way in Scandinavia, and also separated by about a millennia of history--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 05:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I'm no expert on the subject, but it seems to me that such an important part of the eda needs to be far more sourced then just the four you have there. Maybe I have high standards, but I see at least three different sources for each section in any article as a minimum. Also, the images seem very modern depictions of the subject.--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 22:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)