Revision as of 06:05, 10 June 2008 editBloodofox (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,848 edits →Indo-European invasion section: References.← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:12, 10 June 2008 edit undoMrg3105 (talk | contribs)15,276 edits →References: secondary and tertiary sourcesNext edit → | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
There are three primary sources here: the Poetic Edda, Prose Edda, and ''Heimskringla''. The references in these sections are all translations and, when there's anything more than a direct translation, it's directly sourced. I don't see why we would need reference tags from multiple translations for a few stanzas - the article is pretty air-tight in terms of references. If you can spot a point where it's not, please point it out. ] (]) 06:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC) | There are three primary sources here: the Poetic Edda, Prose Edda, and ''Heimskringla''. The references in these sections are all translations and, when there's anything more than a direct translation, it's directly sourced. I don't see why we would need reference tags from multiple translations for a few stanzas - the article is pretty air-tight in terms of references. If you can spot a point where it's not, please point it out. ] (]) 06:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Wasn't talking about primary sources. Its the secondary and tertiary sources I'm more concerned with. --] (]) ♠<font color="#BB0000">♥</font><font color="#BB0000">♦</font>♣ 06:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:12, 10 June 2008
Æsir–Vanir War is currently a Religion, mysticism and mythology good article nominee. Nominated by an unspecified nominator at 05:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
Mythology Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Norse history and culture Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Military history Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Indo-European invasion section
I have no idea what Dumézil is on about with the "Middle-Eastern migration". However, because Lindow mentions vanir exhibiting incestuous practices, to identify them as a historical people all one needs to do is find such practices in European history. So far as I'm aware, the only populations to exhibit this was the archaic Hellenic tribes, but they are somewhat out of the way in Scandinavia, and also separated by about a millennia of history--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 05:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
References
Hi. I'm no expert on the subject, but it seems to me that such an important part of the eda needs to be far more sourced then just the four you have there. Maybe I have high standards, but I see at least three different sources for each section in any article as a minimum. Also, the images seem very modern depictions of the subject.--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 22:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
There are three primary sources here: the Poetic Edda, Prose Edda, and Heimskringla. The references in these sections are all translations and, when there's anything more than a direct translation, it's directly sourced. I don't see why we would need reference tags from multiple translations for a few stanzas - the article is pretty air-tight in terms of references. If you can spot a point where it's not, please point it out. :bloodofox: (talk) 06:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Wasn't talking about primary sources. Its the secondary and tertiary sources I'm more concerned with. --mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 06:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)