| Revision as of 15:36, 12 June 2008 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by WillyJulia - ""← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:42, 12 June 2008 edit undoWillyJulia (talk | contribs)102 edits →Help!Next edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| stop putting the link back in it has been deleted like 3 times already by other users!! <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | stop putting the link back in it has been deleted like 3 times already by other users!! <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| omg so the link can be in big bold font at top but i cant even put it in the discussion? | |||
Revision as of 15:42, 12 June 2008
|
Unsigned and uncivil comments on this talk page maybe reverted. To sign your comment click on  or type ~~~~
|
 Archives |
Optus
I'm certain Rob.au is correct. The correct title for the cited article is in fact 'MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER AND FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2008', and shouldn't be changed. I think copying the use of the CAPITAL LETTERS is something we can do without :) -- Longhair\ 18:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- No, your advice is not wrong. Singapore Telecommunications Limited And Subsidiary Companies (which you inserted into the article) is who authored the report, the report title is the longer in CAPS just after. -- Longhair\ 18:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- As per Longhair's comments, what you changed it to is not the title of the document. There's no style issue here - a citation is a citation. Not only is there no need to shorten it, but you can't... I've never heard of it being okay and WP:CITE only talks about giving "full citations". You can see the document's position in context on the Optus Site or the SingTel Site. Obviously you had a fair point about the ALLCAPS and I maintained your change to Title Case when correcting the citation back to the correct title. -- Rob.au (talk) 02:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Murrumbidgee River is new ACOTF
Murrumbidgee River has been selected as the new Australian collaboration. You supported this article's nomination, so please help to improve it in any way you can. Thanks! --Scott Davis 07:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Help!
Look someone is pretending to be me! I didn't say any of this. Someone is faking to be me! http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:202.7.183.130 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.7.183.130 (talk) 11:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
stop putting the link back in it has been deleted like 3 times already by other users!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by WillyJulia (talk • contribs) 15:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
omg so the link can be in big bold font at top but i cant even put it in the discussion?