| Revision as of 17:04, 12 June 2008 editSelket (talk | contribs)13,275 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:11, 12 June 2008 edit undoCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →Comfort womenNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :You are indeed right. Very sorry. --''']''' <sup>]</sup> 17:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | :You are indeed right. Very sorry. --''']''' <sup>]</sup> 17:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::No, you're not right. The anon blanked yesterday on ] by his POV, and imporperly removed legitimate warnings.--] (]) 17:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:11, 12 June 2008
Comfort women
the summary was clear.
one was a dutch page not in english. see general policy on use of english reference. one was immediately above. NONE included the actual quotation in context to prove the point ... which I then added.
actually the one that I added a quote is perfectly suitable to prove the point (being the Judgment International Military Tribunal for the Far East. the purpose is to prove the point after all not.
thank you --60.42.252.205 (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- You are indeed right. Very sorry. --Selket 17:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- No, you're not right. The anon blanked yesterday on Japanese war crimes by his POV, and imporperly removed legitimate warnings.--Caspian blue (talk) 17:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)