| Revision as of 18:51, 12 June 2008 editJaysweet (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers8,707 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Comfort women. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:59, 12 June 2008 edit undoJaysweet (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers8,707 edits →Reply: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Comfort women|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Comfort women|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | ||
| == Reply == | |||
| Caspian blue has reverted you on ] exactly one time. That is not edit warring. Two other editors have also reverted your changes to that article (well, three now if you count me). You have undone the changes of each of those editors. That is considered edit warring ''regardless of the merits of your claim''. I see you have switched to discussing the matter on the ], that is good. I trust you will not revert the article again without establishing consensus. Thank you. --] (]) 18:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:59, 12 June 2008
I performed some mainly copyedits on the contentious Comfort Women page which carries two major tags requiring work. I responded to other editors reasonable questions.
Very shortly after, I received a number of increasingly hysteria warning threats and revisions from a Pro-Korean editors Caspian_blue .
I recognised that I was being set up in an attempted WP:3RR or IP admin that would support his POV and post a note of this on his page ... preempting exactly what I suspected 1 minute later .
Then followed a complaint by the user to http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism.
What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument, whittle down the written English and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --60.42.252.205 (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Comfort women. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Jaysweet (talk) 18:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Reply
Caspian blue has reverted you on Comfort women exactly one time. That is not edit warring. Two other editors have also reverted your changes to that article (well, three now if you count me). You have undone the changes of each of those editors. That is considered edit warring regardless of the merits of your claim. I see you have switched to discussing the matter on the article talk page, that is good. I trust you will not revert the article again without establishing consensus. Thank you. --Jaysweet (talk) 18:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)