Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:26, 12 June 2008

I performed some mainly copyedits on the contentious Comfort Women page which carries two major tags requiring work. I responded to other editors reasonable questions.

Very shortly after, I received a number of increasingly hysteric warning threats and revisions from a Pro-Korean editor Caspian_blue . The article was then identically reverted by another editor. I continued to develop the article.

I recognised that I was being set up in an attempted WP:3RR or IP admin that would support his POV and post a note of this on his page ... preempting exactly what I suspected 1 minute later .

Then followed a complaint by the user to http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism.

What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument, whittle down the written English and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --60.42.252.205 (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

3RR on Comfort women. EdJohnston (talk) 19:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

60.42.252.205 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

--- *All three editor performed the identical and total deletion of all of the work I am doing on the article. --- * All three removed entirely neutral copyedits. --- * None engaged in any discussion --- * None had previous sought to address the tags at the top of the article. --- * I do not challenge any of the claims on the article nor have I ever suggested that Korean women were signing up in droves so, please, get real. --- * I have attempted discuss with all parties and on the topic page. --- * And it is entirely accurate to represent, as I have done, that there was an existing sex industry in Korea prior to, during, and after the Japanese invasion (indeed, it expanded considerable during the American invasion). If war is anything, it is crime by men against women regardless of race or nationality. I am not Asian, putting this topic into shape is going to require an impartial hand. ---* The intention behind Caspian's assault is far too transparent (he even presents the attempt to continue a discussion on his talk page as a 3RR!) and the protagonists have immediately reverted all edits.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2='''Let us be honest and clear ... this is a knowingly contrived situation designed to maintain control of an article''' ... Indeed, one I predicted the account Caspian blue would attempt on his talk page and above at top. --- '''*'''All three editor performed the identical and total deletion of all of the work I am doing on the article. --- '''*''' All three removed entirely neutral copyedits. --- '''*''' None engaged in any discussion --- '''*''' None had previous sought to address the tags at the top of the article. --- '''*''' I do not challenge any of the claims on the article nor have I ever suggested that Korean women were signing up in droves so, please, get real. --- '''*''' I have attempted discuss with all parties and on the topic page. --- '''*''' And it is entirely accurate to represent, as I have done, that there was an existing sex industry in Korea prior to, during, and after the Japanese invasion (indeed, it expanded considerable during the American invasion). If war is anything, it is crime by men against women regardless of race or nationality. I am not Asian, putting this topic into shape is going to require an impartial hand. ---'''*''' The intention behind Caspian's assault is far too transparent (he even presents the attempt to continue a discussion on his talk page as a 3RR!) and the protagonists have immediately reverted all edits. ---'''*''' Lastly, if you look at the diffs, I was actually continuing to develop topic and being the one '''subject''' to identical revisions. --] (]) 19:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1='''Let us be honest and clear ... this is a knowingly contrived situation designed to maintain control of an article''' ... Indeed, one I predicted the account Caspian blue would attempt on his talk page and above at top. --- '''*'''All three editor performed the identical and total deletion of all of the work I am doing on the article. --- '''*''' All three removed entirely neutral copyedits. --- '''*''' None engaged in any discussion --- '''*''' None had previous sought to address the tags at the top of the article. --- '''*''' I do not challenge any of the claims on the article nor have I ever suggested that Korean women were signing up in droves so, please, get real. --- '''*''' I have attempted discuss with all parties and on the topic page. --- '''*''' And it is entirely accurate to represent, as I have done, that there was an existing sex industry in Korea prior to, during, and after the Japanese invasion (indeed, it expanded considerable during the American invasion). If war is anything, it is crime by men against women regardless of race or nationality. I am not Asian, putting this topic into shape is going to require an impartial hand. ---'''*''' The intention behind Caspian's assault is far too transparent (he even presents the attempt to continue a discussion on his talk page as a 3RR!) and the protagonists have immediately reverted all edits. ---'''*''' Lastly, if you look at the diffs, I was actually continuing to develop topic and being the one '''subject''' to identical revisions. --] (]) 19:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1='''Let us be honest and clear ... this is a knowingly contrived situation designed to maintain control of an article''' ... Indeed, one I predicted the account Caspian blue would attempt on his talk page and above at top. --- '''*'''All three editor performed the identical and total deletion of all of the work I am doing on the article. --- '''*''' All three removed entirely neutral copyedits. --- '''*''' None engaged in any discussion --- '''*''' None had previous sought to address the tags at the top of the article. --- '''*''' I do not challenge any of the claims on the article nor have I ever suggested that Korean women were signing up in droves so, please, get real. --- '''*''' I have attempted discuss with all parties and on the topic page. --- '''*''' And it is entirely accurate to represent, as I have done, that there was an existing sex industry in Korea prior to, during, and after the Japanese invasion (indeed, it expanded considerable during the American invasion). If war is anything, it is crime by men against women regardless of race or nationality. I am not Asian, putting this topic into shape is going to require an impartial hand. ---'''*''' The intention behind Caspian's assault is far too transparent (he even presents the attempt to continue a discussion on his talk page as a 3RR!) and the protagonists have immediately reverted all edits. ---'''*''' Lastly, if you look at the diffs, I was actually continuing to develop topic and being the one '''subject''' to identical revisions. --] (]) 19:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock