| Revision as of 23:34, 27 August 2005 editFamekeeper (talk | contribs)778 edits →problematical accused viewpoint | Revision as of 00:50, 28 August 2005 edit undoMaurreen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,724 edits solutions?Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| I think Jimbo in fact knows all this , and is chuckling , as he is very clever .] 23:34, 27 August 2005 (UTC) | I think Jimbo in fact knows all this , and is chuckling , as he is very clever .] 23:34, 27 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Solutions?== | |||
| Robert, I only read part of what you wrote on the main page here, but I agree that things could be improved and that ideally mediation would come before user conduct RFCs. | |||
| Maybe we should start ]? ] ] 00:50, 28 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:50, 28 August 2005
Problematical Accused Viewpoint
But, it is cleverer than you think , McC: majority opinion rules. Of course it is completely illogical , in fact I assume it is a typo error, asit is so contradictory of sources.
Other thing is that , well, arbitration doesn't achieve anything, a little mental spank and a few days in the can at best.
Then, well you get users like me who have a floating IP number.
I think Jimbo in fact knows all this , and is chuckling , as he is very clever .Famekeeper 23:34, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Solutions?
Robert, I only read part of what you wrote on the main page here, but I agree that things could be improved and that ideally mediation would come before user conduct RFCs.
Maybe we should start Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution reform? Maurreen (talk) 00:50, 28 August 2005 (UTC)