| Revision as of 01:25, 29 August 2005 editVisviva (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators35,899 edits →It's time← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:32, 29 August 2005 edit undoTitoxd (talk | contribs)43,130 edits →It's timeNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| It's now 01:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC), so NFD is now officially active. I'm thinking about being ] and removing the header at the top of the page. --]<font color="#008000">]</font> 01:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC) | It's now 01:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC), so NFD is now officially active. I'm thinking about being ] and removing the header at the top of the page. --]<font color="#008000">]</font> 01:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :This appears to be going forward as a fait accompli, but for the record I really think that more time should have been allowed for reflection. This page is a '''Bad Idea'''. -- ] 01:25, 29 August 2005 (UTC) | :This appears to be going forward as a fait accompli, but for the record I really think that more time should have been allowed for reflection. This page is a '''Bad Idea'''. -- ] 01:25, 29 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :: I don't think so. It removes VFD (AFD) clutter, and it clearly says near the top, "check if your nomination belongs here" in my words. Any really controversial discussion will find its way to the Village Pump, RfC, or other mechanisms, so it won't be a "backwater" as it's been described. At least that's what I think and believe in. --]<font color="#008000">]</font> 01:32, 29 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:32, 29 August 2005
Talk pages
This page looks like it is off to a good start. One element I do disagree with the proposed outline on are talk pages. While in my time here I can't ever remember a talk page being nominated for deletion, it seems logical that such a nomination would go here, rather than at AfD. Talk page deletions are very unusual, and like the deletion of user or policy page, should only be nominated when there is a blatant breech of policy. As with the other pages that will be listed here the article deletion policy gives little guidance on when and why talk pages should be deleted, and talk pages thus similarly require special procedures. - SimonP 02:22, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
- I agree completely. -Sean Curtin 23:42, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
Just a note
We've done a little work in this area on Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Deletion sorting. See Talk pages for deletion, User pages for deletion, Misplaced Pages pages for deletion, and the umbrella list Misplaced Pages-related pages for deletion, which also includes some items from article namespace.
Note that, at this writing, none of these lists are perfectly up to date. Feel free to help out! -- Visviva 04:05, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
It's time
It's now 01:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC), so NFD is now officially active. I'm thinking about being bold and removing the header at the top of the page. --Titoxd 01:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- This appears to be going forward as a fait accompli, but for the record I really think that more time should have been allowed for reflection. This page is a Bad Idea. -- Visviva 01:25, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- I don't think so. It removes VFD (AFD) clutter, and it clearly says near the top, "check if your nomination belongs here" in my words. Any really controversial discussion will find its way to the Village Pump, RfC, or other mechanisms, so it won't be a "backwater" as it's been described. At least that's what I think and believe in. --Titoxd 01:32, 29 August 2005 (UTC)