| Revision as of 19:54, 22 June 2008 editThedemonhog (talk | contribs)12,045 edits →The Bruised Bluenana: Delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:45, 28 June 2008 edit undoDavid Eppstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,895 edits close as deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}} | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. —] (]) 04:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| :{{la|The Bruised Bluenana}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|The Bruised Bluenana}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Might fit better in a list of episodes. <span style="border:3px solid #004e00;padding:2px;">] ]</span> 17:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | Might fit better in a list of episodes. <span style="border:3px solid #004e00;padding:2px;">] ]</span> 17:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 17: | ||
| * '''Delete''' Nope, can't see how in any way this one is worth it's own article. <font color="#0D98DA">]</font> <sub>]</sub> 01:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' Nope, can't see how in any way this one is worth it's own article. <font color="#0D98DA">]</font> <sub>]</sub> 01:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''': If a television episode does not establish notability, it should be merged into a list of episodes. The main article for the series will also suffice. –''']''' <small>''] • ]''</small> 19:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''': If a television episode does not establish notability, it should be merged into a list of episodes. The main article for the series will also suffice. –''']''' <small>''] • ]''</small> 19:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 04:45, 28 June 2008
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
The Bruised Bluenana
- The Bruised Bluenana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Might fit better in a list of episodes. StaticGull Talk 17:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete It's a plot summary which already has a suitably brief synopsis on the Chowder (TV series) article. Yngvarr (c) 18:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per Yngvarr. « D. Trebbien (talk) 19:24 2008 June 16 (UTC)
- Keep. That there is already a capsule synopsis at Chowder (TV series) isn't a rationale to delete, since most of our "X TV season" articles have both short in-article synopses as well as full length articles for the episodes. I don't see anything here that violates our guidelines on episode synopses. Ford MF (talk) 20:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- It does not meet WP:N, A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, because it does not provide verifable sources for adherence of that policy. This is why I state that a separate article is not suitable, but the synopses entry on the main series page is suitable. Further, it does not meet any of the guidelines at WP:EPISODE. I won't address the (seemingly endless) dispute at WP:EPISODE; until it is resolved, I'll adhere to the guideline as it is written. Finally, if one were to address the spelling, grammar, etc, and that the article is written purely as a plot summary, and then consider WP:PLOT, the article would end up trimmed down to a handful of sentences, for which the main series page would suffice. Yngvarr (c) 21:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Yngvarr (c) 21:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Nope, can't see how in any way this one is worth it's own article. treelo talk 01:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: If a television episode does not establish notability, it should be merged into a list of episodes. The main article for the series will also suffice. –thedemonhog talk • edits 19:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.