| Revision as of 17:53, 30 June 2008 edit216.194.1.222 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:26, 30 June 2008 edit undoEliz81 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,681 editsm Reverted edits by 216.194.1.222 (talk) to last version by 71.74.28.110Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ |
{{BLPsources|date=May 2008}} | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| '''Professor Retha Marvine Warnicke''' (b. ]) American historian and Professor of History at ]. Professor Warnicke graduated with a ] from ], ], in 1961. She then moved on to ], were she earned her ] and ] in 1963 and 1969, respectively. | '''Professor Retha Marvine Warnicke''' (b. ]) American historian and Professor of History at ]. Professor Warnicke graduated with a ] from ], ], in 1961. She then moved on to ], were she earned her ] and ] in 1963 and 1969, respectively. During her junior year, she joined ] and in her senior year, she was granted the Listenfelt Scholarship, for outstanding Undergraduate History Major, following in 1961 with the ]. | ||
| ⚫ | From 1965 to 1966, Professor Warnicke was an Instructor at Phoenix College. She then taught at ] as a Lecturer from 1966 to 1967. She then left to pursue her ] before returning to continue as a Lecturer from 1969 to 1973. Warnicke rose through the ranks to Assistant Professor, then Associate Professor and finally Professor in 1973, 1976 and 1984, respectively. | ||
| During her junior year, she joined ] and in her senior year, she was granted the Listenfelt Scholarship, for outstanding Undergraduate History Major, following in 1961 with the Woodrow Wilson Fellowship. | |||
| ⚫ | Professor Warnicke was the first woman hired in the History Department of ASU, and taught the first Women's History course ever offered there. Through her advocacy and lobbying efforts, the History Department began to add women and minority men to the department – and as a result, the History Department is nearly half female and has a large minority presence. In addition to her efforts in the History Department, Professor Warnicke has also devoted much of her time to affirmative action and faculty rights. | ||
| ⚫ | From 1965 to 1966, Warnicke was an |
||
| Professor Warnicke is an expert on politics and protocol at the Tudor Court, Gender Issues in the Early Modern Period (] - c. ]) and Jacobean Funerary Rites for Women. | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | She is the author of numerous articles; including ''Inventing the Wicked Women of Tudor England: Alice More, ] and Anne Stanhope'' and ''Sexual Heresy at the Court of Henry VIII''. She is also the author of ''The Marrying of Anne of Cleves: Royal Protocol in Tudor England'', which was published in 2000 by Cambridge. Her most recent book, ''Mary, Queen of Scots'', which was published by Routledge in 2006, has received positive scholarly reviews. | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| She is most famous for her controversial theories over the life of ]'s second wife, ]. These theories were outlined in various articles in the mid-1980s; ''Anne Boleyn's Childhood and Adolescence'' and ''Sexual Heresy at the Court of Henry VIII''. The theories were built on and elaborated in her ] book ''The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn: Family politics at the court of Henry VIII''. | She is most famous for her controversial theories over the life of ]'s second wife, ]. These theories were outlined in various articles in the mid-1980s; ''Anne Boleyn's Childhood and Adolescence'' and ''Sexual Heresy at the Court of Henry VIII''. The theories were built on and elaborated in her ] book ''The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn: Family politics at the court of Henry VIII''. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 23: | ||
| * Most importantly, she argues that Anne miscarried a deformed fetus in January ] which fueled 16th-century fears of witchcraft and sexual deviance and led to her execution in May - "''In an attempt to understand her by the terms of her society, information from a wide range of sources will be used to support the argument that she miscarried a defective fetus in 1536. It was because Henry VIII viewed this mishap as an evil omen, both for his lineage and his kingdom, that he had her accused of engaging in illicit sexual acts with five men and fostered rumors that she had afflicted him with impotence and had conspired to poison both his daughter ] and his illegitimate son, ].''" | * Most importantly, she argues that Anne miscarried a deformed fetus in January ] which fueled 16th-century fears of witchcraft and sexual deviance and led to her execution in May - "''In an attempt to understand her by the terms of her society, information from a wide range of sources will be used to support the argument that she miscarried a defective fetus in 1536. It was because Henry VIII viewed this mishap as an evil omen, both for his lineage and his kingdom, that he had her accused of engaging in illicit sexual acts with five men and fostered rumors that she had afflicted him with impotence and had conspired to poison both his daughter ] and his illegitimate son, ].''" | ||
| Warnicke's theories were harshly criticised by some other historians - particularly ] and G.W. Bernard. She defended her arguments in a ] article ''The Fall of Anne Boleyn Revisited'', although she did not insist on the various elaborations as rigorously as before. She suggested that Ives's theory on Anne's fall (that it was caused by foreign policy and palace politics) was based on an over-reliance on Spanish sources and that his theory on her youth was ridiculous. She was even harsher with G.W. Bernard's suggestion that Anne might have been guilty of ] in ]. It is a ''dubious assertion'' with no reliable documentary proof. She concluded: | Warnicke's theories were harshly criticised by some other historians - particularly ] and G.W. Bernard. She defended her arguments in a ] article ''The Fall of Anne Boleyn Revisited'', although she did not insist on the various elaborations as rigorously as before. She suggested that Ives's theory on Anne's fall (that it was caused by foreign policy and palace politics) was based on an over-reliance on Spanish sources and that his theory on her youth was ridiculous. She was even harsher with G.W. Bernard's suggestion that Anne might have been guilty of ] in ]. It is a ''dubious assertion'' with no reliable documentary proof. She concluded: | ||
| "''As long as the lurid charges against the Queen exist only in unsubstantiated indictments and contradictory diplomatic writings, historians ought to remain sceptical about factional theories of her adulterous guilt or of factional politics. At the least, they owe it to the past not to further obscure the facts.''" | "''As long as the lurid charges against the Queen exist only in unsubstantiated indictments and contradictory diplomatic writings, historians ought to remain sceptical about factional theories of her adulterous guilt or of factional politics. At the least, they owe it to the past not to further obscure the facts.''" | ||
| Her theories were severely distorted in ]'s novel '']''. Gregory's author's note claimed that her novel's conclusion was based upon Warnicke's findings in ''The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn'' |
Her theories were severely distorted in ]'s novel '']''. Gregory's author's note claimed that her novel's conclusion was based upon Warnicke's findings in ''The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn,'' but Warnicke has publicly distanced herself from the novel and its presentation of the Boleyns. | ||
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Warnicke, Retha}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Warnicke, Retha}} | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 18:26, 30 June 2008
 | This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libelous. Find sources: "Retha Warnicke" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Professor Retha Marvine Warnicke (b. 1939) American historian and Professor of History at Arizona State University. Professor Warnicke graduated with a B.A. from Indiana University, magna cum laude, in 1961. She then moved on to Harvard University, were she earned her M.A. and Ph.D. in 1963 and 1969, respectively. During her junior year, she joined Phi Beta Kappa and in her senior year, she was granted the Listenfelt Scholarship, for outstanding Undergraduate History Major, following in 1961 with the Woodrow Wilson Fellowship.
From 1965 to 1966, Professor Warnicke was an Instructor at Phoenix College. She then taught at Arizona State University as a Lecturer from 1966 to 1967. She then left to pursue her Ph.D. before returning to continue as a Lecturer from 1969 to 1973. Warnicke rose through the ranks to Assistant Professor, then Associate Professor and finally Professor in 1973, 1976 and 1984, respectively.
Professor Warnicke was the first woman hired in the History Department of ASU, and taught the first Women's History course ever offered there. Through her advocacy and lobbying efforts, the History Department began to add women and minority men to the department – and as a result, the History Department is nearly half female and has a large minority presence. In addition to her efforts in the History Department, Professor Warnicke has also devoted much of her time to affirmative action and faculty rights.
Professor Warnicke is an expert on politics and protocol at the Tudor Court, Gender Issues in the Early Modern Period (1400 - c. 1700) and Jacobean Funerary Rites for Women. She is the author of numerous articles; including Inventing the Wicked Women of Tudor England: Alice More, Anne Boleyn and Anne Stanhope and Sexual Heresy at the Court of Henry VIII. She is also the author of The Marrying of Anne of Cleves: Royal Protocol in Tudor England, which was published in 2000 by Cambridge. Her most recent book, Mary, Queen of Scots, which was published by Routledge in 2006, has received positive scholarly reviews.
She is most famous for her controversial theories over the life of Henry VIII's second wife, Anne Boleyn. These theories were outlined in various articles in the mid-1980s; Anne Boleyn's Childhood and Adolescence and Sexual Heresy at the Court of Henry VIII. The theories were built on and elaborated in her 1989 book The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn: Family politics at the court of Henry VIII.
Warnicke's Theories on Anne Boleyn
- She argued against the general theory that Anne Boleyn was born around 1501. Instead, she believes that Anne was born much later - in the summer of 1507.
- The popular rumours that Anne had several small deformities-- like an extra fingernail or moles--are incorrect, since rumours of deformities only began after Anne's death and no-one who met her ever commented on them; - "... the two cannot logically be reconciled to each other. Had there been even a hint of a deformity in Anne's appearance, the Venetian, as well as the Imperial ambassadors... would have eagerly revealed this intriguing fact to their respective governments."
- "For many historians Anne remains the lady with the extra fingernail who was too flirtatious, even if in a harmless courtly way, for her own safety and well being. The result of this interpretation is that the responsibility for her tragic death resides with her, the victim, rather than with the king and his ministers, the ones who orchestrated her execution."
- Most importantly, she argues that Anne miscarried a deformed fetus in January 1536 which fueled 16th-century fears of witchcraft and sexual deviance and led to her execution in May - "In an attempt to understand her by the terms of her society, information from a wide range of sources will be used to support the argument that she miscarried a defective fetus in 1536. It was because Henry VIII viewed this mishap as an evil omen, both for his lineage and his kingdom, that he had her accused of engaging in illicit sexual acts with five men and fostered rumors that she had afflicted him with impotence and had conspired to poison both his daughter Mary and his illegitimate son, Henry, duke of Richmond."
Warnicke's theories were harshly criticised by some other historians - particularly E.W. Ives and G.W. Bernard. She defended her arguments in a 1993 article The Fall of Anne Boleyn Revisited, although she did not insist on the various elaborations as rigorously as before. She suggested that Ives's theory on Anne's fall (that it was caused by foreign policy and palace politics) was based on an over-reliance on Spanish sources and that his theory on her youth was ridiculous. She was even harsher with G.W. Bernard's suggestion that Anne might have been guilty of adultery in 1536. It is a dubious assertion with no reliable documentary proof. She concluded:
"As long as the lurid charges against the Queen exist only in unsubstantiated indictments and contradictory diplomatic writings, historians ought to remain sceptical about factional theories of her adulterous guilt or of factional politics. At the least, they owe it to the past not to further obscure the facts."
Her theories were severely distorted in Philippa Gregory's novel The Other Boleyn Girl. Gregory's author's note claimed that her novel's conclusion was based upon Warnicke's findings in The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn, but Warnicke has publicly distanced herself from the novel and its presentation of the Boleyns.
Categories: