| Revision as of 19:19, 1 July 2008 editRaul654 (talk | contribs)70,896 edits ←Created page with '{{subst:RfC|GoRight}}' | Revision as of 19:39, 1 July 2008 edit undoRaul654 (talk | contribs)70,896 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ''Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.'' | ''Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.'' | ||
| ==Statement of the dispute== | ==Statement of the dispute== | ||
| GoRight, a user with a history of disruptive editing on global warming articles, returned 11 days ago. Since then, he has fomented numerous edit wars and harassed other users (the latter resulting in a 24 hour block) | |||
| ''This is a summary written by users who are concerned by this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.'' | |||
| === Desired outcome === | === Desired outcome === | ||
| GoRight should be community banned from global warming related articles. If he continues his harassment of WMC, he should be indefinitely blocked as well. | |||
| ''This is a summary written by users who have initiated the request for comment. It should spell out exactly what the changes they'd like to see in the user, or what questions of behavior should be the focus.'' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| ⚫ | === Description === | ||
| The "what's the point of this again?" bit. Half of the world is going to think it's precursor to arbcom, the other half are probably not going to look to closely since the _point_ isn't clear, and the other half are going to be going for the jugular no matter what. | |||
| GoRight is a single purpose ] with a history of problematic editing on Misplaced Pages. (His contribs edits to non-global warming related articles) GoRight does not understand or abide by Misplaced Pages policies regarding reliable sourcing | |||
| So here if someone *cough* would write out a nice clear concise explanation of what they hoped would happen by raising this, all would be right with the world. | |||
| --> | |||
| It was pointed out to him that his claims | |||
| ⚫ | === Description === | ||
| ''{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}'' | |||
| , and when this was pointed out to him, he admitted he did not bother to read the link. | |||
| He has repeatedly violated our policies regarding biographies of living people. | |||
| He recently returned from a 6 month hiatus. Since his return 11 days ago, he has fomented no less than 9 simultaneous edit wars on global warming-related articles: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. He was blocked by R. Baley for repeatedly harassing ]. | |||
| === Evidence of disputed behavior === | === Evidence of disputed behavior === | ||
Revision as of 19:39, 1 July 2008
In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 19:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 00:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC).
Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.
Statement of the dispute
GoRight, a user with a history of disruptive editing on global warming articles, returned 11 days ago. Since then, he has fomented numerous edit wars and harassed other users (the latter resulting in a 24 hour block)
Desired outcome
GoRight should be community banned from global warming related articles. If he continues his harassment of WMC, he should be indefinitely blocked as well.
Description
GoRight is a single purpose civil POV pusher with a history of problematic editing on Misplaced Pages. (His contribs contain exactly 4 edits to non-global warming related articles) GoRight does not understand or abide by Misplaced Pages policies regarding reliable sourcing
It was pointed out to him that his claims
, and when this was pointed out to him, he admitted he did not bother to read the link.
He has repeatedly violated our policies regarding biographies of living people.
He recently returned from a 6 month hiatus. Since his return 11 days ago, he has fomented no less than 9 simultaneous edit wars on global warming-related articles: William M. Gray, Global warming, William Connolley, Fred Singer, Lawrence Solomon, RealClimate, An Inconvenient Truth, and Global warming controversy. He was blocked by R. Baley for repeatedly harassing user:William M. Connelly.
Evidence of disputed behavior
(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
Applicable policies and guidelines
{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}
Evidence of trying to resolve the dispute
(provide diffs and links)
Evidence of failing to resolve the dispute
(provide diffs and links to demonstrate that the disputed behavior continued after trying to resolve the dispute)
Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}
Other users who endorse this summary
Response
This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary:
Outside view
This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary:
Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.