| Revision as of 19:50, 12 July 2008 editCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Variant texts in Scientology doctrine. using TW | Revision as of 22:19, 12 July 2008 edit undoSteve Dufour (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers21,429 edits →Variant texts in Scientology doctrineNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :{{la|Variant texts in Scientology doctrine}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Variant texts in Scientology doctrine}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| See prior discussion - ]. The article appears to be mostly ], and relies heavily on primary sources, and an ] analysis of those primary sources. Has not received significant discussion in ]/] secondary sources, though of course I am amenable to being proven wrong about this point, would love to see the sources that go into detail discussing this topic. ] (]) 19:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC) | See prior discussion - ]. The article appears to be mostly ], and relies heavily on primary sources, and an ] analysis of those primary sources. Has not received significant discussion in ]/] secondary sources, though of course I am amenable to being proven wrong about this point, would love to see the sources that go into detail discussing this topic. ] (]) 19:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''No comment''' ;-) ] (]) 22:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:19, 12 July 2008
Variant texts in Scientology doctrine
- Variant texts in Scientology doctrine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
See prior discussion - Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Altered texts in Scientology doctrine. The article appears to be mostly WP:OR, and relies heavily on primary sources, and an WP:OR analysis of those primary sources. Has not received significant discussion in WP:RS/WP:V secondary sources, though of course I am amenable to being proven wrong about this point, would love to see the sources that go into detail discussing this topic. Cirt (talk) 19:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- No comment ;-) Steve Dufour (talk) 22:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)