Misplaced Pages

:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abd/Allemandtando: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:32, 15 July 2008 editJc37 (talk | contribs)Administrators48,906 edits (ec) - comments← Previous edit Revision as of 21:41, 15 July 2008 edit undoAbd (talk | contribs)14,259 edits User:Abd/Allemandtando: Keep, of course. One of the sillier MfD's I've seen, since it will make no difference at all to anything beyond a minute's work for me, and I spent more than that on thisNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
* '''Delete'''. A personal book of grudges isn't appropriate for userspace. ] - ] 21:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC) * '''Delete'''. A personal book of grudges isn't appropriate for userspace. ] - ] 21:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - While I think that users should be able to use their userspace for a "dispute resolution" purpose (such as collating diffs for arbcomm), this doesn't seem to have such a "feel" to it. Looks more like a ''"please troll about a specific user here"''. That may not be the intent, but that's how it currently appears to me. Further clarification welcome. - ] 21:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - While I think that users should be able to use their userspace for a "dispute resolution" purpose (such as collating diffs for arbcomm), this doesn't seem to have such a "feel" to it. Looks more like a ''"please troll about a specific user here"''. That may not be the intent, but that's how it currently appears to me. Further clarification welcome. - ] 21:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
**'''Keep''', of course, '''but whatever is less fuss.''' That's right, there is no evidence in that file, not because there is no evidence, but because it hasn't been compiled, I started the page and have been focused elsewhere, little stuff like rescuing articles and putting my kids to bed. What a silly waste of time! I have an off-wiki copy, and can simply compile evidence into that. Note that I never publicized this file, beyond maybe one mention to an admin, but Allemendtando generated an AN/I report complaining about it, which went nowhere. Bad move, Ryan. I'd expect better from you. The file will then come back with evidence, perhaps as a draft RfC. Net effect of this MfD: zero. No matter what the outcome is. But before voting in this MfD, one might read ] which does discuss the page somewhat, and also see ] which is a developed -- but still incomplete -- evidence page. And some comments seem very strange, as if nobody has actually read the page.--] (]) 21:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:41, 15 July 2008

User:Abd/Allemandtando

Abd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has created this page as an evidence file against User:Allemandtando. There isn't any evidence there as yet, but he encourages users to post to it should/when Allemantando screw up. This isn't fair on Allemantando having such a page documenting his every move in someone elses userspace, with little final goal (it's certainly not a draft RfC or anything like that). We've previously deleted laundry list of grievances, and this page is just that. It's an assumption of bad faith towards Allemantando by expecting him to do something wrong. Ryan Postlethwaite 21:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

If he wants to (or any other editors) wish to post an RfC about me or my actions, I am happy for them to do and have no objections for them to do so - but I'll be honest, this feel more like stalking - like he's never going to do anything with it but wants me to know he's watching. If he has problems, he should comply his evidence and start a RfC. I will not vote in this MfD and will only make further comment at the request of fellow editors. --Allemandtando (talk) 21:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per ample precedence and good sense. Might be a candidate for speedying. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 21:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - borders WP:STALK as a lot of people will be looking at his edits. D.M.N. (talk) 21:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Whatever the intent of the page, the result is insufficient good faith due toward an editor. —C.Fred (talk) 21:27, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. A personal book of grudges isn't appropriate for userspace. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - While I think that users should be able to use their userspace for a "dispute resolution" purpose (such as collating diffs for arbcomm), this doesn't seem to have such a "feel" to it. Looks more like a "please troll about a specific user here". That may not be the intent, but that's how it currently appears to me. Further clarification welcome. - jc37 21:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
    • Keep, of course, but whatever is less fuss. That's right, there is no evidence in that file, not because there is no evidence, but because it hasn't been compiled, I started the page and have been focused elsewhere, little stuff like rescuing articles and putting my kids to bed. What a silly waste of time! I have an off-wiki copy, and can simply compile evidence into that. Note that I never publicized this file, beyond maybe one mention to an admin, but Allemendtando generated an AN/I report complaining about it, which went nowhere. Bad move, Ryan. I'd expect better from you. The file will then come back with evidence, perhaps as a draft RfC. Net effect of this MfD: zero. No matter what the outcome is. But before voting in this MfD, one might read User talk:Abd/Allemandtando which does discuss the page somewhat, and also see User:Abd/GoRight which is a developed -- but still incomplete -- evidence page. And some comments seem very strange, as if nobody has actually read the page.--Abd (talk) 21:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)