| Revision as of 22:42, 15 July 2008 editPascal.Tesson (talk | contribs)25,698 edits →Stop removing valid warnings: block← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:52, 15 July 2008 edit undoCbsite (talk | contribs)428 editsm →Short blockNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ==Short block== | ==Short block== | ||
| Hi. I've just blocked your account for the next three hours. This is not a comment on whether you are right or wrong about the stance on images but what is clear is that you're getting into edit wars over the whole thing and that certainly is a problem. I'll post a thread at ] in the next few minutes and it is likely that this will yield to an unblocking of the account provided you can get into reasonable discussion with the other parties involved. ] (]) 22:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC) | Hi. I've just blocked your account for the next three hours. This is not a comment on whether you are right or wrong about the stance on images but what is clear is that you're getting into edit wars over the whole thing and that certainly is a problem. I'll post a thread at ] in the next few minutes and it is likely that this will yield to an unblocking of the account provided you can get into reasonable discussion with the other parties involved. ] (]) 22:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| {{unblock}} | |||
| I actually requested protection for earlier today because of this. I did eventually follow proper procedure, which really calls this block into question. | |||
| BTW, ] (]) reverted the edits back to the way I had them anyway. I think this is kind of a useless exercise. ] (]) 22:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:52, 15 July 2008
Havin' a groovy time ! Cbsite (talk) 13:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Image:Kirk Gaitskell-Kendrick.jpeg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kirk Gaitskell-Kendrick.jpeg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. β 20:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Stop removing valid warnings
Please stop removing valid warning on images and Deletion discussion pages. You may be treated as a vandal if you continue to do so. If you want do contest a deletion nomination, just vote keep there. If you want to contest a speedy delete, use {{hangon}}. But don't just remove the warnings! --Damiens.rf 21:08, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I was just writing the same note, but got an edit conflict. Stop removing the discussion from the page, or you'll be blocked. The images listed there does not mean that they will be deleted; its a discussion. - Rjd0060 (talk) 21:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Short block
Hi. I've just blocked your account for the next three hours. This is not a comment on whether you are right or wrong about the stance on images but what is clear is that you're getting into edit wars over the whole thing and that certainly is a problem. I'll post a thread at WP:ANI in the next few minutes and it is likely that this will yield to an unblocking of the account provided you can get into reasonable discussion with the other parties involved. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 22:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Cbsite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.Change
{{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
I actually requested protection for this page earlier today because of this. I did eventually follow proper procedure, which really calls this block into question.
BTW, Pascal.Tesson (talk) reverted the edits back to the way I had them anyway. I think this is kind of a useless exercise. Cbsite (talk) 22:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Category: