| Revision as of 16:36, 19 July 2008 editWorkerBee74 (talk | contribs)787 edits →re Salon← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:06, 23 July 2008 edit undoDie4Dixie (talk | contribs)3,574 edits →In case of need, please follow link:: remove sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ==In case of need, please follow link: == | |||
| : | |||
| == As requested, my argument for ACORN sentence, organized == | == As requested, my argument for ACORN sentence, organized == | ||
Revision as of 07:06, 23 July 2008
| This is Die4Dixie's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
As requested, my argument for ACORN sentence, organized
This is a form message I'm cross posting on various user talk pages: As requested, I wrote up my argument in one spot, consolidating what I'd said before and adding just a bit. Please take a look at it at User:Noroton/The case for including ACORN and comment at Talk:Barack Obama#Case for ACORN proposed language, restated. Thanks, Noroton (talk) 03:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
re Salon
I checked out your user edits but I couldn't find what you were referencing. It probably was staring me right in the face ;) Can you point me to what it is? Trilemma (talk) 21:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
i think that the whole salon thing is over the top vand every reference needs to be removed. My edit should highlight the inappropriateness of the source. I know WP point, but when I tried to touch it the folks climbed out of the wood work to revert.--Die4Dixie (talk) 01:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Talk:Barack Obama
Let's keep it simple and civil. You know they will try to bait us and provoke us into something and then get us blocked for it. You have described this as the disagree/ provoke/ report cycle. Don't let them do it. When they start baiting you, report them. WorkerBee74 (talk) 16:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)