| Revision as of 21:52, 20 July 2008 editWorkerBee74 (talk | contribs)787 edits Blatant attempt to influence content dispute in another article← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:53, 20 July 2008 edit undoScjessey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,021 edits →Bill Ayers election controversyNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :{{la|Bill Ayers election controversy}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Bill Ayers election controversy}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| POV fork to get around ] and ] ] (]) 21:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | POV fork to get around ] and ] ] (]) 21:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| This is very obviously a ]-type of ] designed to evade the rules at ] and ]. A campaign-related event with very little publicity. What little media coverage it received was in the context of the poorly-conducted TV debate in which the matter was raised. I recommend that this article be deleted. -- ] (]) 21:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Strongly opposed.''' Thirty minutes after I mentioned at ] that "no one here has nominated for deletion, Scjessey raced over here and nominated it for deletion. A blatant, shameless attempt to influence a content dispute in another article. Very notable, impeccably sourced. Should be a GA nominee rather than an AfD nominee. ] (]) 21:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | *'''Strongly opposed.''' Thirty minutes after I mentioned at ] that "no one here has nominated for deletion, Scjessey raced over here and nominated it for deletion. A blatant, shameless attempt to influence a content dispute in another article. Very notable, impeccably sourced. Should be a GA nominee rather than an AfD nominee. ] (]) 21:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:53, 20 July 2008
Bill Ayers election controversy
- Bill Ayers election controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
POV fork to get around WP:BLP and WP:WEIGHT Scjessey (talk) 21:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
This is very obviously a coatrack-type of POV fork designed to evade the rules at WP:BLP and WP:WEIGHT. A campaign-related event with very little publicity. What little media coverage it received was in the context of the poorly-conducted TV debate in which the matter was raised. I recommend that this article be deleted. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Strongly opposed. Thirty minutes after I mentioned at Talk:Barack Obama that "no one here has nominated for deletion, Scjessey raced over here and nominated it for deletion. A blatant, shameless attempt to influence a content dispute in another article. Very notable, impeccably sourced. Should be a GA nominee rather than an AfD nominee. WorkerBee74 (talk) 21:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC)