Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Paradigm piracy: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:25, 25 July 2008 editSynergy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,794 edits Paradigm piracy: re to Tsuzuki26← Previous edit Revision as of 08:20, 25 July 2008 edit undoHoary (talk | contribs)Administrators77,826 edits Paradigm piracy: delNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
*'''Keep''' There are many people who identify as paradigm pirates, but not as chaos magicians, most notably from the ] movement. ] (]) 04:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC) *'''Keep''' There are many people who identify as paradigm pirates, but not as chaos magicians, most notably from the ] movement. ] (]) 04:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
:*You say ''most notably'' but the only reference being used specifically for discordianism is one members website on geocites. The rest of the sources are primarily from chaotes (i.e. chaos magicians). Can you prove this assertion? ''']'''] 06:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC) :*You say ''most notably'' but the only reference being used specifically for discordianism is one members website on geocites. The rest of the sources are primarily from chaotes (i.e. chaos magicians). Can you prove this assertion? ''']'''] 06:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' this impressive-sounding but, it seems, little-used name for a preposterously banal notion. -- ] (]) 08:20, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:20, 25 July 2008

Paradigm piracy

Paradigm piracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

term is a self admitted neologism, an attempted merge met with what seems to be a keenness for an article which seems to be barely-disguised advertising for a non-notable book with a similar name. Concept exists but not notable independent of other articles such as chaos magic. Attempted merges by several editors keep being met with reversion so this needs to be resolved via the wider community at AfD. Sticky Parkin 01:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

  • You say most notably but the only reference being used specifically for discordianism is one members website on geocites. The rest of the sources are primarily from chaotes (i.e. chaos magicians). Can you prove this assertion? Synergy 06:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Categories: