| Revision as of 21:40, 9 August 2008 editPectore (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,454 edits reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:01, 13 August 2008 edit undoBrandon (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators22,415 edits Closing debate; result was DeleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''Delete'''. ]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 18:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{ns:0|B}} | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| :{{la|Mohammad Umer}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Mohammad Umer}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 27: | ||
| *'''Delete''' New stories should go to ]. This is a ] event that in the future will eventually lose notability. <b><font color="teal">]</font></b>''<sup><font color="teal">]</font></sup>'' <sup><b><font color="teal">]</font></b></sup> 08:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' New stories should go to ]. This is a ] event that in the future will eventually lose notability. <b><font color="teal">]</font></b>''<sup><font color="teal">]</font></sup>'' <sup><b><font color="teal">]</font></b></sup> 08:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''': Non-notable person.--] (]) 12:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''': Non-notable person.--] (]) 12:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 18:01, 13 August 2008
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. BJ 18:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Mohammad Umer
- Mohammad Umer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Bio of non notable. News coverage of one story cited. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 15:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 15:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 15:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 15:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Weak Keep or Merge: the incident is notable in itself, although i don't know if the person should be the topic of the article, or the incident, or if it should be removed and merged in a more general article like Islam in India, or a (non existent) Hindi-Muslim Marriages in India. Gorgonzola (talk) 15:45, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect/Merge/or similar per the one event rule (something about if a person is famous for only one event cover the event (assuming it is notable) and not the person).Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:53, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
KeepMove to wikinews or similar- He nets over 300 google news hits. The article should cover the person because newspapers have covered a chain of events that began with his elopement with a member of another religious community.Pectore 23:55, 7 August 2008 (UTC)- Keep, but rename to event per wp:blp1e. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:58, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete: This is Misplaced Pages , not Mills and Boon to feature some silly love story! Hundreds of people convert every days in order to get married to someone from another relegion, How is this any different. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 05:29, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: Might I also add that this article was created by a well known POV pusher. So I really wouldnt attach any credence to this article. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 09:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - The story merited coverage in India. Personal statements removedBut back on the actual topic at hand, it merits mention on Misplaced Pages in some fashion due to its widespread coverage, though I also believe now that a page is unnecessary and that wikinews/the like is a more proper form of description.Pectore 18:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- Reply: I will reply to your personal comments on your talk page. W.r.t the news coverage , every second day there is some news report in the paper about some inter-caste love story with opposing parents & community members, court cases, police protection etc etc. Should they all feature in Misplaced Pages as notable just because newspapers cover them? What is so special about this love story? --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 19:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- Reply - I have removed personal comments, I dont think it was right for me to escalate this into a mud-digging page. The point is that unless you find a case with similar notability, we dont have a reason to believe it does not merit coverage. It went to the Bombay High court, it merits over 300 google news hits. Just remember that wikipedia has notability guidelines for a reason. If papers cover it, there is obviously some importance to it. The marriage itself isnt a big deal I agree, but the rammifications of divisions within the sindhi panchayat, the apparent hypocrisy of the RSS/Bajrang Dal/etc, and the legal events make it notable.
- Reply: I will reply to your personal comments on your talk page. W.r.t the news coverage , every second day there is some news report in the paper about some inter-caste love story with opposing parents & community members, court cases, police protection etc etc. Should they all feature in Misplaced Pages as notable just because newspapers cover them? What is so special about this love story? --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 19:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - The story merited coverage in India. Personal statements removedBut back on the actual topic at hand, it merits mention on Misplaced Pages in some fashion due to its widespread coverage, though I also believe now that a page is unnecessary and that wikinews/the like is a more proper form of description.Pectore 18:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete New stories should go to Wikinews. This is a WP:RECENT event that in the future will eventually lose notability. Gizza 08:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: Non-notable person.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 12:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.