| Revision as of 06:04, 12 August 2008 editPeter Damian (old) (talk | contribs)2,336 edits reasons for deletion | Revision as of 06:05, 12 August 2008 edit undoPeter Damian (old) (talk | contribs)2,336 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| * '''Advertising or other spam without relevant content''' (but not an article about an advertising-related subject). The article is highly promotional (NLP is full of self-promotional terms). Please note the distinction between 'promotion', which is advertising and shouldn't be in Misplaced Pages, and a valid article about a scientific concept. | * '''Advertising or other spam without relevant content''' (but not an article about an advertising-related subject). The article is highly promotional (NLP is full of self-promotional terms). Please note the distinction between 'promotion', which is advertising and shouldn't be in Misplaced Pages, and a valid article about a scientific concept. | ||
| * '''The article is entirely content-free'''. Note the phrase is " says that know-how can be separated from the person, documented and transferred experientially, and that the ability to perform the skills can be transferred subject to the modelers own limits, which can change, and improves with practice". This is of course gibberish. You cannot 'perform a skill'. Either the NLP technique of copying a skill actually transfers the skill or ability, or it transfers the ability to copy the actions of skilled people. The first is impossible, the second is useless. | |||
| * '''Articles which cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms and original theories and conclusions'''. * The article tries underpins the pseudoscientific basis of NLP by appealing to valid scientific notions like 'model'. In NLP, modelling someone's behaviour is simply copying the behaviour of a skilled person in the attempt to transfer those skills. Thus NLP is peddled as a miraculous method that can turn you into something you are not. | * '''Articles which cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms and original theories and conclusions'''. * The article tries underpins the pseudoscientific basis of NLP by appealing to valid scientific notions like 'model'. In NLP, modelling someone's behaviour is simply copying the behaviour of a skilled person in the attempt to transfer those skills. Thus NLP is peddled as a miraculous method that can turn you into something you are not. | ||
| * '''Articles whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline'''. There is absolutely no need for such a huge section on NLP modeling. The effect of this subpage is to turn the article in to a “how to”. ] (]) 06:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC) | * '''Articles whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline'''. There is absolutely no need for such a huge section on NLP modeling. The effect of this subpage is to turn the article in to a “how to”. ] (]) 06:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:05, 12 August 2008
NLP Modeling
- NLP Modeling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per Misplaced Pages:DEL#Reasons_for_deletion, in particular
- Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject). The article is highly promotional (NLP is full of self-promotional terms). Please note the distinction between 'promotion', which is advertising and shouldn't be in Misplaced Pages, and a valid article about a scientific concept.
- The article is entirely content-free. Note the phrase is " says that know-how can be separated from the person, documented and transferred experientially, and that the ability to perform the skills can be transferred subject to the modelers own limits, which can change, and improves with practice". This is of course gibberish. You cannot 'perform a skill'. Either the NLP technique of copying a skill actually transfers the skill or ability, or it transfers the ability to copy the actions of skilled people. The first is impossible, the second is useless.
- Articles which cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms and original theories and conclusions. * The article tries underpins the pseudoscientific basis of NLP by appealing to valid scientific notions like 'model'. In NLP, modelling someone's behaviour is simply copying the behaviour of a skilled person in the attempt to transfer those skills. Thus NLP is peddled as a miraculous method that can turn you into something you are not.
- Articles whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline. There is absolutely no need for such a huge section on NLP modeling. The effect of this subpage is to turn the article in to a “how to”. Peter Damian (talk) 06:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC)