Misplaced Pages

:Featured picture candidates/Hematospermia: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:48, 16 August 2008 editVanderdecken (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,203 edits →Image:Hematospermia.jpg: oppose← Previous edit Revision as of 11:53, 16 August 2008 edit undoVanderdecken (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,203 edits added argument I forgotNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
* '''Support as nominator''' --<b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 23:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC) * '''Support as nominator''' --<b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 23:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''': Test tube and background totally irrelevant, microscopic image itself doesn't meet size guidelines. ] (]) 03:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC) *'''Oppose''': Test tube and background totally irrelevant, microscopic image itself doesn't meet size guidelines. ] (]) 03:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' - very poor quality, red blood cells have been poorly cut out from another photo and stuck on top of the image of the spermatozoa, leading to the scale being completely wrong (would someone like to find out the precise scale of sperm to red blood cells?) The test tube is almost completely irrelevant and again, low quality enlarged further than it should be. Not entertaining or visually compelling or pleasing. —]∴ ''']]]''' 11:48, 16 August 2008 (UTC) *'''Oppose''' - very poor quality, red blood cells have been poorly cut out from another photo and stuck on top of the image of the spermatozoa, leading to the scale being completely wrong (would someone like to find out the precise scale of sperm to red blood cells?) Not to mention the fact that the ''red blood cells not even being from the same photo'' as the sperm reduces the encyclopaedic value to zero. The test tube is almost completely irrelevant and again, low quality enlarged further than it should be. Not entertaining or visually compelling or pleasing. The licence is also dubious ("I created this work entirely by myself") - I doubt you actually took the microscope photos of the sperm or blood cells, and the test tube too. —]∴ ''']]]''' 11:48, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> <!-- additional votes go above this line -->
{{-}} {{-}}

Revision as of 11:53, 16 August 2008

Image:Hematospermia.jpg

Original - Illustration of Hematospermia
Reason
Quality illustration of Hematospermia.
Articles this image appears in
Hematospermia, Semen
Creator
Jaakobou
  • Support as nominator --Jaakobou 23:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose: Test tube and background totally irrelevant, microscopic image itself doesn't meet size guidelines. Joe D (talk) 03:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose - very poor quality, red blood cells have been poorly cut out from another photo and stuck on top of the image of the spermatozoa, leading to the scale being completely wrong (would someone like to find out the precise scale of sperm to red blood cells?) Not to mention the fact that the red blood cells not even being from the same photo as the sperm reduces the encyclopaedic value to zero. The test tube is almost completely irrelevant and again, low quality enlarged further than it should be. Not entertaining or visually compelling or pleasing. The licence is also dubious ("I created this work entirely by myself") - I doubt you actually took the microscope photos of the sperm or blood cells, and the test tube too. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:48, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Categories: