| Revision as of 17:10, 19 August 2008 editDamiens.rf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,536 edits →Image:TimeDec10 1984.jpg← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:16, 19 August 2008 edit undoDr. Blofeld (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors636,186 edits →Image:Gian Maria Volontè.jpg (now Image:Gian Maria Volonte1965.jpg)Next edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ::You do realise that Mr. Volonte died back in 1994 don't you. If the commons image was taken in January 2008 do you think it is reasonable to say that there may be something wrong with the details? ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 13:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | ::You do realise that Mr. Volonte died back in 1994 don't you. If the commons image was taken in January 2008 do you think it is reasonable to say that there may be something wrong with the details? ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 13:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::Are you saying it's not really him? The flickr image is from this set: ; those may well be old pre-digital photographs from the early 90s; the date displayed in the metadata would just be the date of scanning. In any case, if you really doubt the legitimacy of the image, that's a case to be solved at commons; the item here on en-wiki will have to be deleted independently anyway, because it duplicates another screenshot that fulfills the same purpose (]#3). ] ] 13:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | :::Are you saying it's not really him? The flickr image is from this set: ; those may well be old pre-digital photographs from the early 90s; the date displayed in the metadata would just be the date of scanning. In any case, if you really doubt the legitimacy of the image, that's a case to be solved at commons; the item here on en-wiki will have to be deleted independently anyway, because it duplicates another screenshot that fulfills the same purpose (]#3). ] ] 13:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| :Okay, so you moved it to ], that solves one part of it (I've deleted the earlier copy, so ] is now commons shining through). But even with your improved rationale, we still have the duplicate function with ]. We still need only one screenshot of him in that role, even if it's to be used in two articles. One of them has to go. I like the other one better. ] ] 14:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | :Okay, so you moved it to ], that solves one part of it (I've deleted the earlier copy, so ] is now commons shining through). But even with your improved rationale, we still have the duplicate function with ]. We still need only one screenshot of him in that role, even if it's to be used in two articles. One of them has to go. I like the other one better. ] ] 14:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | {{done}} I agree! Fixed.]</span> <sup>]</sup> 17:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
){kind=link}
Revision as of 17:16, 19 August 2008
| < August 18 | August 20 > |
|---|
August 19
Image:Kit bodyShirtCA.png
- Image:Kit bodyShirtCA.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kaka12o (notify | contribs).
- orphan and low res. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Image:D-fructose-2,6-bisphosphate wpmp.png
- Image:D-fructose-2,6-bisphosphate wpmp.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Zephyris (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. Though not technically inaccurate, it displays a form of the chemical that is not found in nature and of little interest. Image:Fructose 2,6-bisphosphate.svg replaces this image with the "popular" form of the chemical. JaGa 04:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Image:Gian Maria Volontè.jpg (now Image:Gian Maria Volonte1965.jpg)
- Image:Gian Maria Volontè.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Blofeld of SPECTRE (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image (movie screenshot) shadowing free image of the actor, which has the same name on commons. Redundant as a movie illustration because there's already a better screenshot of the same character in the same movie (Image:Fistfuldollarsvolante.jpg). Also lacks meaningful FUR and was falsely used in two articles instead of the one it was declared for. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
- You do realise that Mr. Volonte died back in 1994 don't you. If the commons image was taken in January 2008 do you think it is reasonable to say that there may be something wrong with the details? The Bald One 13:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Are you saying it's not really him? The flickr image is from this set: ; those may well be old pre-digital photographs from the early 90s; the date displayed in the metadata would just be the date of scanning. In any case, if you really doubt the legitimacy of the image, that's a case to be solved at commons; the item here on en-wiki will have to be deleted independently anyway, because it duplicates another screenshot that fulfills the same purpose (WP:NFCC#3). Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- You do realise that Mr. Volonte died back in 1994 don't you. If the commons image was taken in January 2008 do you think it is reasonable to say that there may be something wrong with the details? The Bald One 13:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, so you moved it to Image:Gian Maria Volonte1965.jpg, that solves one part of it (I've deleted the earlier copy, so Image:Gian Maria Volontè.jpg is now commons shining through). But even with your improved rationale, we still have the duplicate function with Image:Fistfuldollarsvolante.jpg. We still need only one screenshot of him in that role, even if it's to be used in two articles. One of them has to go. I like the other one better. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Done I agree! Fixed. The Bald One 17:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Image:Don Chipp portrait - National Library of Australia.jpg
- Image:Don Chipp portrait - National Library of Australia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hide&Reason (notify | contribs).
- There's a funny free image showing this guy: Image:HainesChipp.jpg Damiens.rf 13:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Image:TimeDec10 1984.jpg
- As determined in dozens or hundreds of precedents, we do not include Time magazine covers just to show that a person was on them. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- And once again FP has orphaned an image then listed it at IFD. I put it back til the IFD is over. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- He's not asking the image to be deleted because it's orphan. He's asking it to be deleted because it's not usable, and that's valid reason to remove the image from the article. --Damiens.rf 16:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- I've removed the image from the article again. The rationale on the image clearly says the purpose of the image is to illustrate a living person. By the way, I have just uploaded a free image of this man. --Damiens.rf 17:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - The first successful permanent artificial heart implantation was a notable event. The picture that Time used to sell magazines with this story wasn't. --Damiens.rf 16:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Image:Reaction Logo.png
- Image:Reaction Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sammo000 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned Sammo000 (talk) 16:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
