User talk:Starblueheather/Okashina Okashi - Strange Candy: Difference between revisions

< User talk:Starblueheather Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:02, 23 August 2008 edit138.251.242.2 (talk) →Speedy Deletion Contest ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:18, 7 September 2008 edit undoBuspar (talk \| contribs)1,719 edits rv TOR sock puppet vandalismNext edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I'm not sure what the original version of this article looked like, since I didn't even know there was an original version. However, this one has 3 secondary references, which would seem to meet the ] criteria for notability. Also, several of the reasons given in the AfD mentioned in the speedy nomination (VANITY, NPOV, NOR, COPYVIO, AB) no longer apply. So a speedy isn't appropriate. ] (]) 04:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)		I'm not sure what the original version of this article looked like, since I didn't even know there was an original version. However, this one has 3 secondary references, which would seem to meet the ] criteria for notability. Also, several of the reasons given in the AfD mentioned in the speedy nomination (VANITY, NPOV, NOR, COPYVIO, AB) no longer apply. So a speedy isn't appropriate. ] (]) 04:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

	:BS to that, you wrote the original one, ]. And you just switched usernames to write this one. Pathetic. ] (]) 16:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

	==Yay!==		==Yay!==
Line 26:		Line 24:
	**All right. Since I know what to look for, I'll try and get a copy of the issue through my library. Once I do, I'll add back the source. ] (]) 04:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)		**All right. Since I know what to look for, I'll try and get a copy of the issue through my library. Once I do, I'll add back the source. ] (]) 04:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
	***No, don't add it back without discussion here first because this doesn't sound like a reputable source at all. --] (]) 05:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC)		***No, don't add it back without discussion here first because this doesn't sound like a reputable source at all. --] (]) 05:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

	==Sockpuppet Editors==

	], the principle editor of this article, is in fact a sockpuppet account for ]. I thought editing articles mentioning your work was a no-no here. Tsk, tsk. ] (]) 22:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:18, 7 September 2008

Comics: Webcomics NA‑class

	Comics portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Misplaced Pages. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
NA	This page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
	This page is supported by WikiProject Webcomics.

LGBTQ+ studies NA‑class

	LGBTQ portal This page is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
NA	This page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Comedy NA‑class

	Comedy portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
NA	This page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

This is a subpage of Starblueheather's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This user page was nominated for deletion on 18 June 2006. The result of the discussion was delete.

This user page was nominated for deletion on 19 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Speedy Deletion Contest

I'm not sure what the original version of this article looked like, since I didn't even know there was an original version. However, this one has 3 secondary references, which would seem to meet the WP:WEB criteria for notability. Also, several of the reasons given in the AfD mentioned in the speedy nomination (VANITY, NPOV, NOR, COPYVIO, AB) no longer apply. So a speedy isn't appropriate. Buspar (talk) 04:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Yay!

Hopefully, nothing will result in a change of opinion in this regard, because I kinda like the OO article. But I shouldn't hope, because "Hope is as hollow as fear." Bulmabriefs144 (talk) 12:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

What is "Bored this Summer? Try Webcomics!" Tech News, 2002-04-23.

I am unable to find this source through my library. --Dragonfiend (talk) 04:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, I'm removing it then. --Dragonfiend (talk) 00:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

It comes from OO's Comixpedia page, where it's listed as a reference. I got in touch with the person who added it and according to them Tech News was a newspaper/magazine in Massachusetts aimed at the 20-something crowd. It printed a series of articles reviewing webcomics, including OO, back in 2002. They say it ceased publishing in 2003 or so, which is probably why you don't have them in your library. I can ask them for a PDF of the article and email it to you if you want. Since I've now verified where it comes from, I'll add it back. Buspar (talk) 05:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

"Someone else on the internet says it is true" is not verification. This is an encyclopedia that requires reputable sources. --Dragonfiend (talk) 23:59, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- All right. Since I know what to look for, I'll try and get a copy of the issue through my library. Once I do, I'll add back the source. Buspar (talk) 04:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
  - No, don't add it back without discussion here first because this doesn't sound like a reputable source at all. --Dragonfiend (talk) 05:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Categories: