| Revision as of 21:51, 29 August 2008 editCoren (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,492 editsm -typo← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:48, 16 November 2008 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,269 edits →Clerical comments on the proposed decision: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ACA|Piotrus 2=yes}} | {{ACA|Piotrus 2=yes}} | ||
| == Clerical comments on the proposed decision == | |||
| If I may, a few suggestions: | |||
| * In finding 4, "Regrettable" should not be capitalised. | |||
| * In finding 6.1, "the Russian regime" should read "the Russian government", because the choice of the pejorative (to my ears) term "]" may create the appearance of prejudice, particularly given the context of the case. | |||
| * In finding 10, I suggest that "fear-mongering" be replaced with a term more in keeping with the measured tone expected from an Arbitration Committee decision. | |||
| I have no opinion on the merits of the case, or of the proposed decision. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:48, 16 November 2008
Arbitrators active on this case
- To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators. If updates to this listing do not immediately show, try purging the cache.
Clerical comments on the proposed decision
If I may, a few suggestions:
- In finding 4, "Regrettable" should not be capitalised.
- In finding 6.1, "the Russian regime" should read "the Russian government", because the choice of the pejorative (to my ears) term "regime" may create the appearance of prejudice, particularly given the context of the case.
- In finding 10, I suggest that "fear-mongering" be replaced with a term more in keeping with the measured tone expected from an Arbitration Committee decision.
I have no opinion on the merits of the case, or of the proposed decision. Sandstein 22:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)