Misplaced Pages

Fathers' rights movement: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:49, 5 September 2008 editMichael H 34 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,390 edits Undid revision 236363499 by Slp1 (talk) Addition of "Men as victims" ? Removal of "many women in the movement" ?← Previous edit Revision as of 13:53, 5 September 2008 edit undoMichael H 34 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,390 edits →Background and history: No attribution, unclear- (Fathers can't be parents? Why?) and contradictory - (Legal regulations do not encourage?)Next edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
The fathers' rights movement includes individuals and groups who are highly diverse in goals, methods and political views, and who focus on a narrow set of issues of interest to their members.<ref name =fralr3>{{cite book |last=Collier |first=R | coauthors = Sheldon S |editor=R. Collier & S Sheldon |title=Fathers' Rights Activism and Law Reform in Comparative Perspective |format= |accessdate= |date=2006 |publisher=Hart Publishing |chapter=Fathers' rights, fatherhood and law reform- International perspectives | isbn = 1841136298}}</ref> The movement includes women as well as men, often the second wives of divorced fathers or other family members of men who have had some engagement with ].<ref name=kaye/><ref name="Many Women in Civil Rights Movement"/><ref name =fralr1/> The fathers' rights movement includes individuals and groups who are highly diverse in goals, methods and political views, and who focus on a narrow set of issues of interest to their members.<ref name =fralr3>{{cite book |last=Collier |first=R | coauthors = Sheldon S |editor=R. Collier & S Sheldon |title=Fathers' Rights Activism and Law Reform in Comparative Perspective |format= |accessdate= |date=2006 |publisher=Hart Publishing |chapter=Fathers' rights, fatherhood and law reform- International perspectives | isbn = 1841136298}}</ref> The movement includes women as well as men, often the second wives of divorced fathers or other family members of men who have had some engagement with ].<ref name=kaye/><ref name="Many Women in Civil Rights Movement"/><ref name =fralr1/>


Discussion about fathers' rights issues began in the West in the 1960s as changes in law prompted an examination of the legal rights and responsibilities of fathers and parents in general.<ref name =fralr3/> During the 1970s fathers' rights organisations such as ] emerged.<ref name =fralr3/> The movement has become increasingly vocal, visible and organised, and has played a powerful presence in family law debates.<ref name =fralr1/> Some commentators see the rise of the movement as a 'backlash' to increasing female power in the family and in society, and the consequent challenge to men's traditional roles and authority. In this view, the movement is seen as part of a 'gender war' between the sexes. Other commentators propose a more complex analysis that sees several interrelated trends as leading to the growing prominence of the movement. They suggest that shifting household demographics, including greater fragmentation of families through the decline in marriage and rising divorce/separation rates, have increased the fragility of men's relationships with their children. Expectations of men as fathers have expanded beyond a traditional breadwinner role to include greater practical and emotional involvement with their children. Men are encouraged, by society and by legal regulation, to be more involved as fathers at a time when, in certain ways, it is more difficult for them to do so due to increased divorce and separation.<ref name =fralr1/><ref name =collier>{{cite news | last =Collier | first =R | coauthors =Sheldon, Sally | title =Unfamiliar territory: The issue of a father's rights and responsibilities covers more than just the media-highlighted subject of access to his children |publisher= ] | date =2006-11-01 | url =http://society.guardian.co.uk/children/story/0,,1935970,00.html |accessdate=2007-10-17 }}</ref> Discussion about fathers' rights issues began in the West in the 1960s as changes in law prompted an examination of the legal rights and responsibilities of fathers and parents in general.<ref name =fralr3/> During the 1970s fathers' rights organisations such as ] emerged.<ref name =fralr3/> The movement has become increasingly vocal, visible and organised, and has played a powerful presence in family law debates.<ref name =fralr1/> Some commentators see the rise of the movement as a 'backlash' to increasing female power in the family and in society, and the consequent challenge to men's traditional roles and authority. In this view, the movement is seen as part of a 'gender war' between the sexes. Other commentators propose a more complex analysis that sees several interrelated trends as leading to the growing prominence of the movement. They suggest that shifting household demographics, including greater fragmentation of families through the decline in marriage and rising divorce/separation rates, have increased the fragility of men's relationships with their children. Expectations of men as fathers have expanded beyond a traditional breadwinner role to include greater practical and emotional involvement with their children.


Sociologists Scott Coltrane and Neal Hickman state that like other political advocacy groups, members of fathers' rights groups cast their personal troubles as pressing social problems,<ref name = "The Rhetoric of Rights and Needs: Moral Discourse in the Reform of Child Custody and Child Support Laws"/><ref name = "Child Support Policy in Australia: Back to basics?"> Sociologists Scott Coltrane and Neal Hickman state that like other political advocacy groups, members of fathers' rights groups cast their personal troubles as pressing social problems,<ref name = "The Rhetoric of Rights and Needs: Moral Discourse in the Reform of Child Custody and Child Support Laws"/><ref name = "Child Support Policy in Australia: Back to basics?">

Revision as of 13:53, 5 September 2008

Rights
Theoretical distinctions
Human rights
Rights by beneficiary
Other groups of rights

The Fathers' rights movement has been characterized as a civil rights movement, whose members are primarily interested in issues affecting fathers and children related to family law, including child custody and child support sometimes after divorce. The movement has also been characterized as a social movement, but members of the fathers' rights movement disagree and state that these issues are "a question not of social science, but of constitutional government." The movement receives international press coverage as a result of high profile style activism of Fathers 4 Justice and other national organizations internationally.

Background and history

The fathers' rights movement includes individuals and groups who are highly diverse in goals, methods and political views, and who focus on a narrow set of issues of interest to their members. The movement includes women as well as men, often the second wives of divorced fathers or other family members of men who have had some engagement with family law.

Discussion about fathers' rights issues began in the West in the 1960s as changes in law prompted an examination of the legal rights and responsibilities of fathers and parents in general. During the 1970s fathers' rights organisations such as Families Need Fathers emerged. The movement has become increasingly vocal, visible and organised, and has played a powerful presence in family law debates. Some commentators see the rise of the movement as a 'backlash' to increasing female power in the family and in society, and the consequent challenge to men's traditional roles and authority. In this view, the movement is seen as part of a 'gender war' between the sexes. Other commentators propose a more complex analysis that sees several interrelated trends as leading to the growing prominence of the movement. They suggest that shifting household demographics, including greater fragmentation of families through the decline in marriage and rising divorce/separation rates, have increased the fragility of men's relationships with their children. Expectations of men as fathers have expanded beyond a traditional breadwinner role to include greater practical and emotional involvement with their children.

Sociologists Scott Coltrane and Neal Hickman state that like other political advocacy groups, members of fathers' rights groups cast their personal troubles as pressing social problems, and that they use rhetorical strategies to elicit emotional responses. Michael Flood, a critic of the fathers' rights movement, states that its members support shared parenting only as a symbolic issue related to "rights", "equality", and "fairness." He further states that its members are not actually interested in the shared care of their children or on the wishes of their children, and he adds that fathers’ rights groups have advocated policies which harm children directly.

Activities

The movement's primary focus has been to campaign (including lobbying and research) for formal legal rights for fathers, and sometimes for children, including changes to family law related to child custody, support and maintenance, abuse and violence as well as the perceived inequities in the family court system themselves. Fathers’ rights groups also provide emotional and practical support for members during separation and divorce.

Some fathers' rights groups have become frustrated with the slow pace of traditional campaigning for law reform. Groups such as Fathers 4 Justice have become increasingly vocal and visible, undertaking public demonstrations which have attracted public attention and influenced the politics of family justice. Advocacy of fathers' rights issues takes place through the internet, on blogs and forums.

Some fathers’ rights groups have been short-lived and unstable, as members and leaders do not remain with the group after they have been helped. Infighting within groups has occurred.

Controversially, fathers' rights activists in various countries have been accused and/or convicted of criminal activities, including stalking, harassment, and murder. Glenn Sacks, a prominent fathers' rights activist, has criticized persons he has called "the lunatic fringe of the fathers' rights movement", who describe the perpetrators of violent crimes against family court judges and others as "some sort of freedom fighters."

Main Issues

No-fault divorce

Main article: No-fault divorce

Members of the fathers' rights movement state that laws establishing no-fault divorce did not stop at removing the requirement that grounds be cited for a divorce, so as to allow for divorce by "mutual consent"; they also allow either spouse to end the marriage without any agreement or fault by the other. They add that while either parent has a right to voluntarily waive their own parental rights and withdraw from their marital and family relationships, the customary practice in divorce courts is to interpret the plaintiff's petition for no-fault divorce as a demand to restrict the defendant parent's family relationships without any evidence that the defendant parent is unfit or harming the child (when unfitness or harm are present, the divorce is not "no-fault"). They also state that no-fault divorce should be referred to as unilateral divorce.

Members of the fathers' rights movement state that laws establishing no-fault divorce can be seen as one of the boldest social experiments in modern history that have effectively ended marriage as a legal contract. They state that it is not possible to form a binding agreement to create a family, adding that government officials can, at the request of one spouse, end a marriage over the objection of the other. They state that no-fault divorce has left fathers with no protection against what they describe as the confiscation of their children. Members of the fathers' rights movement propose "reasonable limits" on no-fault divorce when children are involved.

Family court system

Main articles: Adversarial system and Family law

Members of the fathers' rights movement have criticized the adversarial court system used in most Western countries, defining court-determined custody as not a right to parent one's children but as the power to prevent the other partner from parenting, biased against fathers, shared custody and any irregularities in life, housing or job stability. The outcome of divorce has also been criticized as overly one-sided, initiated by the wife in two-thirds of cases, and providing many benefits for the woman such as automatic custody and financial rewards in the form of child support payments, while courts are slow to help fathers maintain their visitation rights as well as expensive and time-consuming.

Members of the fathers' rights movement including Stephen Baskerville also state that family courts are secretive, censoring and punitive of fathers who criticize them and further state that employees and activists within the courts support the separation of children from parents.

Critics of the fathers' rights movement contest these conclusions and state the ability to assert fathers' rights has resulted in the reduction of mothers' rights, also asserting that the smaller number fathers as custodial parents is due to choice by the fathers rather than bias in the courts.

Child custody - Shared parenting

Main articles: Child custody, Shared parenting, Best interests, and Rebuttable presumption

Stating that "children need both parents", the fathers’ rights movement calls for greater equality in parental responsibility following separation and divorce. They call for laws creating a rebuttable presumption of 50/50 shared custody so that children would generally spend equal time with each parent unless there were reasons against it. They point to studies showing that children in shared custody settings are better adjusted and have fewer social problems such as low academic achievement, crime, pregnancy, substance abuse, depression and suicide, and state that shared parenting is in fact in the best interests of the child. Members of the fathers' rights movement and their critics disagree about the correlation of negative developmental outcomes for children to sole custody situations. Critics of the fathers' rights movement and researcher V. C. McLoyd state that father absence covaries with other relevant family characteristics such as the lack of an income from a male adult, the absence of a second adult, and the lack of support from a second extended family system and conclude that it is the negative effects of poverty, and not the absence of a father, that result in negative developmental outcomes. On the other hand, members of the fathers' rights movement state that although the consequences of poverty and having a single parent are interrelated, each is a risk factor with independent effects on children, and that the negative outcomes for children in sole custody situations correlate more strongly to "fatherlessness" than to any other variable including poverty.
Members of the fathers' rights movement criticize the best interests of the child standard currently used in many countries for making custody decisions, which they describe as highly subjective and based on the personal prejudices of family court judges and court-appointed child custody evaluators, and that courts are abusive when more than half custody is taken away from a willing, competent parent. They state that a rebuttable presumption of shared parenting is supported by a majority of citizens, and that their proposals to enact such laws are opposed by divorce lawyers and by feminist organizations, the latter by invoking the specter of domestic violence and child abuse as propaganda directed against fathers and fathers' rights groups.

Critics point to research suggesting that joint custody arrangements are good for children only if there is little parental conflict. They state that if shared parenting were ordered, fathers would not provide their share of the daily care for the children. Critics also question the motives of those promoting shared parenting, noting that it would result in substantial decreases in or termination of child support payments.
Members of the fathers' rights movement state that shared parenting has been demonstrated to reduce parental conflict by requiring parents to cooperate and compromise, and that it is the lack of constraint by one parent resulting from the ability of that parent to exclude the other, that results in increased parental conflict. They add that only when child support guidelines exceed true costs do parents ask for or seek to prevent changes in parenting time for financial reasons, adding that any argument that a parent is asking for increased parenting time to reduce child support is at the same time an argument that the other parent is making a profit from child support.

Critics state that some fathers' rights groups are more interested in enabling men to re-establish authority over their children and ex-partners and that issues of power and control in cases of domestic violence and child abuse are ignored. Members of the fathers’ rights movement state that fathers have a constitutional right to shared control of their children and through political action they intend to establish parental authority for the well-being of their children. They also point out that a rebuttable presumption for shared parenting preserves a child's protection against unfit or violent parents.

Child support

See also: Child support and Paternity fraud

Members of the fathers’ rights movement campaign for the reform of child support guidelines, which in most Western countries are based on maintaining the children's standard of living after separation, and on the assumption that the children live with one parent and never with the other. Activists state that the current guidelines are arbitrary, provide mothers with financial incentives to divorce, and leave fathers with little discretionary income to enjoy with the children during their parenting time. In their place, fathers’ rights activists propose guidelines based on a Cost Shares model, in which child support would be based on the average income of the parents and the estimated child costs incurred by both parents. Critics of the Cost Share Model guidelines including Laura W. Morgan state that it focuses on the relative living standards of divorcing parents rather than the best interests of the children and financially supporting them at the same level after divorce.

Noting research that cultural communities emphasize different aspects of fatherhood, members of the fathers' rights movement state that the law should value a broader definition of fathering for poor fathers by reducing the focus on collecting child support and encouraging the informal contributions (such as groceries, clothes, toys, time with the children) of these fathers, by counting these contributions as child support.

Members of the fathers’ rights movement state that child support should be terminated under certain conditions, such as if the custodial parent limits access to the children by moving away against the wishes of the other parent, gives fraudulent testimony, or if paternity fraud is discovered, adding that two men should not have to pay child support for the same child.

They also state that it is often difficult for fathers in financial hardship or who take on a larger caregiving role with their children to have their child support payments lowered. They point out that unemployment is the primary cause of child support arrears, and state that these arrearages make the father subject to arrest and imprisonment without due process.

Members of the fathers' rights movement state that the purpose of child support should be publicly determined, and enforcement programs must be designed to serve that purpose, observing the due process of law.

Domestic violence and Child abuse

Main articles: Domestic violence, Emotional abuse, and Child abuse

Supporters of the fathers' rights movement assert that some women make false claims of domestic violence or child abuse in order to gain an upper hand in divorce, custody disputes and/or prevent fathers from seeing their children, and they state that lawyers advise women to make such claims. They state that false claims of domestic violence and child abuse are encouraged by the inflammatory "win or lose" nature of child custody hearings, and that men are presumed to be guilty rather than innocent by police and by the courts. They oppose the use of certain definitions of violence in child custody hearings that are based on fear, harassment and/or stalking, viewing them as vaguely defined and difficult to refute.

Members of the fathers' rights movement state paternal risk of child abuse is minimal. They add that when child abuse occurs, the perpetrator is not likely to be the father, and that the child abuse most often occurs after the father has been separated from his children. They state that government policies are creating child abuse by separating children from their fathers.

Supporters of the fathers’ rights movement point to domestic violence studies based on the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS), which suggest that men and women act violently toward their partners in about equal percentages. Members of the fathers' rights movement including Michael McCormick and Glenn Sacks state that men comprise a "significant minority" of the victims of domestic violence, and other supporters call for more services to be provided for male victims of domestic violence. Critics of the CTS dispute its reliability. Michael Flood states that the CTS definitions of domestic violence obscure "variations in the meaning, consequences, and context of violent behaviors in families and relationships."

Supporters of the fathers' rights movement have proposed that both domestic violence and child abuse must be adjudicated as criminal assault, observing due process protections, and that government funding for programs addressing these issues must be made contingent on such protections.

Parenting time interference and Parental alienation syndrome

Main articles: Parental alienation and Parental alienation syndrome

Members of the fathers' rights movement state that some mothers interfere with the father's parenting time and that such interference should be stopped. They state that parenting time interference can result from the custodial parent's relocation beyond a practical distance from the noncustodial parent and they campaign for a rebuttable presumption prohibiting such relocations.

They state that parental alienation is a well-documented phenomena and that Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) is a valid syndrome in which a child is alienated by a parent against the other parent for the purpose of gaining or retaining full custody of the children, and they offer advice to fathers about what to do if their access to their children is affected by parental alienation.

Critics of the fathers' rights movement and of parental alienation syndrome note that it is not considered a syndrome by the American Psychological Association and state that it is nothing more than a legal strategy that has been rejected by some members of the legal community.

Critics and members of the fathers' rights movement agree about the danger that claims of parental alienation syndrome may be used by abusive fathers as a weapon against appropriately protective mothers in order to win custody.

Unwarranted Termination of Parental Rights and Adoptions

Main article: Parents' Rights Movement

Parents' rights advocates state that many parents' parental rights are unnecessarily terminated, and that children are separated from fathers and mothers and adopted through the actions of family courts and government social service agencies seeking to meet their own targets, rather than looking at the merits of each case.

Members of the fathers' rights movement state that government employees harm children by disregarding the loving bonds they share with their fathers, when social workers place children in the foster care system without informing their fathers.

Fathers' rights movement by country

Main articles: Fathers' rights movement by country and Parental responsibility (access and custody)

Issues related to the fathers' rights movement in specific countries are included in Fathers' rights movement by country.

Fathers' rights and issues with language

Fathers' and parents' rights campaigners state that parenting time should be used to replace contact, visitation and residence. The term visitation is particularly objectionable to fathers' rights activists, who believe that this term reinforces the idea that only one parent raises the children. It is perceived that there is a stigma associated with treating one parent as resident and the other as non-resident. The use of the terms absent parent, putative father, and non-custodial parent have also been challenged.

Members of the fathers' rights movement state that child support should be referred to as parental transfer payments.

Notable supporters

Public supporters of the fathers' rights movement and their issues, include divorced (and subsequently widowed) Live Aid founder, Bob Geldof, Irish writer and journalist John Waters, ex-UK Home Secretary David Blunkett and Karen DeCrow, former president of the National Organization for Women

Significant writers

Books

  • Divorced Dad's Survival Book: How to Stay Connected With Your Kids / David Knox & Kermit Leggett (2000) ISBN 0738203173
  • Father and Child Reunion: How to Bring the Dads We Need to the Children We Love / Warren Farrell (2001) ISBN 1585420751
  • Elusive Innocence: Survival Guide for the Falsely Accused / Dean Tong (2001) ISBN 1563841908
  • Fathers after Divorce: Building a New Life and Becoming a Successful Separated Parent / Michael Green (2002) ISBN 1876451009
  • Divorce Poison: Protecting the Parent-Child Bond from a Vindictive Ex / Richard Warshak (2003) ISBN 0060934573
  • Torn Apart: True Stories of Excluded Fathers / Tim Willis (2005) ISBN 1904977308
  • Without Authority / Barry Worrall (2006) ISBN 1900080095
  • That Bitch: Protect Yourself Against Women With Malicious Intent / Roy Sheppard & Mary Cleary (2007) ISBN 1901534103
  • Taken Into Custody: The War Against Fathers, Marriage, and the Family / Stephen Baskerville (2007) ISBN 1581825943

References

  1. ^ Sacks, G (2006-06-21). "Why Are There so Many Women in the Fathers' Movement?". {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |publsher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help)
  2. Baskerville, Stephen (2007). Taken Into Custody - The War Against Fathers, Marriage and the Family. Cumberland House. p. 259. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  3. ^ Collier, R (2006). "Fathers' rights, fatherhood and law reform- International perspectives". In R. Collier & S. Sheldon (ed.). Fathers' Rights Activism and Law Reform in Comparative Perspective. Hart Publishing. ISBN 1841136298. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference collier was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. McKee, A (2005). The Public Sphere: an introduction. University of Queensland. p. p. 47. ISBN 9780521549905. {{cite book}}: |page= has extra text (help)
  6. Kenedy, R (2004). Fathers For Justice: The Rise Of A New Social Movement In Canada As A Case Study Of Collective Identity Formation. Caravan Books. ISBN 978-0882061085.
  7. Baskerville, S (2007). Taken Into Custody: The War Against Fathers, Marriage and the Family. Cumberland House. p. 282. ISBN 1581825943.
  8. ^ Collier, R (2006). "Fathers' rights, fatherhood and law reform- International perspectives". In R. Collier & S Sheldon (ed.). Fathers' Rights Activism and Law Reform in Comparative Perspective. Hart Publishing. ISBN 1841136298. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) Cite error: The named reference "fralr3" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  9. ^ Kaye, M (1998). "Fathers' Rights Groups in Australia and their Engagement with Issues in Family Law". Australian Journal of Family Law. 12: pp 19–68. Retrieved 2007-03-24. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  10. ^ Coltrane, Scott; Hickman, Neal. "The Rhetoric of Rights and Needs: Moral Discourse in the Reform of Child Custody and Child Support Laws". Social Problems. 19 (4). University of California Press: 400–420.
  11. Smyth, Bruce. "Child support Policy in Australia: Back to basics?" (PDF). Family Matters (67). Australian Institute of Family Studies. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
  12. Flood, Michael. "Separated Fathers and the Fathers' Rights Movement". Feminism, Law and the Family Workshop. Law School, University of Melbourne. Retrieved 2007-03-12. {{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help)
  13. ^ Flood, Michael (2004). "Angry Men's Movements". In Stacey Elin Rossi (ed.). The Battle and Backlash Rage On. Xlibris Corporation. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); |format= requires |url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  14. Coates, S (2005-06-08). "Fathers 4 Justice split by infighting". Times Online. Retrieved 2008-09-03.
  15. “Stalker: lesson learned”, Herald-Sun, 30 September 2004
  16. BBC News (25 July, 2002). "Australian militant fathers under fire". BBC. Retrieved 2007-03-24. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  17. “Threat to crack down on vigilante group.” The Age, 25 July 2002
  18. Militants harassed woman, daughter.” The Canberra Times, 6 August 2002
  19. "Message proves unsettling". Times Union. June 26, 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-24. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  20. Morgan Bolton, Michele (April 21, 2006). "Custody Bill Fight Turns Frightful: Women's Groups Say They Are Being Threatened Over Their Stance On Legislation". Albany New York Times Union. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  21. Ryan, Harriet (October 26, 2007). "A dog's yelp, a friend's 'weird' stare: Mack witness recounts signs of a killing". Court TV. Retrieved 2007-10-30.
  22. Hennessey, Kathleen (October 24, 2007). "Lawyer: Reno man killed wife in self-defense, spun into delusions". Associated Press. Retrieved 2007-10-30.
  23. Roberts, Troy (May 3, 2008). "Caught In The Crossfire:A Wife And Judge Get Caught In The Crossfire Of An Explosive Divorce". CBS. Retrieved 2008-09-04.
  24. Sacks, G (2006-06-19). "Do I Even Need to Say This?". Retrieved 2007-03-24.
  25. Baskerville, Stephen (2007). Taken Into Custody - The War Against Fathers, Marriage and the Family. Cumberland House. p. 45. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  26. "Phyllis Schlafly's keynote address". American Coalition of Fathers and Children. September 2006. Retrieved 2007-05-12.
  27. ^ Baskerville, Stephen (2007). Taken Into Custody - The War Against Fathers, Marriage and the Family. Cumberland House. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Unknown parameter |comment= ignored (help)
  28. Baskerville, Stephen (2007). Taken Into Custody - The War Against Fathers, Marriage and the Family. Cumberland House. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Unknown parameter |comment= ignored (help)
  29. ^ Baskerville, Stephen (2007). Taken Into Custody - The War Against Fathers, Marriage and the Family. Cumberland House. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Unknown parameter |comment= ignored (help)
  30. ^ Baskerville, Stephen (2007). Taken into Custody: The War Against Fatherhood, Marriage, and the Family. Cumberland House Publishing. ISBN 1-58182-594-3.
  31. "Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Fourth Report". House of Commons, Parliament UK. 2005-02-23. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  32. ^ Charalambous, Mark (2005-07-10). "New research shows bias in restraining orders". The Fatherhood Coalition. Retrieved 2007-04-14.
  33. "The Operation of the Family Courts" (pdf). House of Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee Family Justice. 2004-11-08. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  34. ^ Baskerville, Stephen (2003). "Divorce as Revolution". 21 (4). Salisbury Review. Retrieved 2008-08-31. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  35. Sacks, G (2004-05-25). "National Fatherhood Initiative's Ad Campaign Insults African-American Fathers". Daily Breeze. Retrieved 2007-03-14. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  36. Baskerville, Stephen (June 2004). "The Fatherhood Crisis: Time for a New Look" (PDF). NCPA Policy Report No. 267 ISBN #1-56808-136-7. National Center for Policy Analysis. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  37. ^ Baskerville, Stephen\] (2002). "The Politics of Fatherhood". Political Science and Politics. 35 (4). Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  38. ^ Baskerville, Stephen (May 2006). "Family Violence in America The Truth About Domestic Violence and Child Abuse" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-03-14.
  39. Grieco, H. "The California National Organization for Women's Family Law Court Watch Program Guide" (pd). California NOW. Retrieved 2007-10-14. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  40. ^ Baker, Maureen (2001). Families, labour and love: . Vancouver: UBC Press. pp. 198–9. ISBN 0-7748-0848-9.
  41. ^ "Fathers' Responsibilities Before Fathers' Rights". NOW-NYS. 2006-07-29. Retrieved 2007-09-09. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  42. Ballard, Travis. "Mitigating the Effects of Divorce on Children". National Congress for Fathers and Children. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  43. ^ "Shared Parenting Council Membership". Shared Parenting Council. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  44. "Why Howard suddenly started to talk about custody battles". theage.com.au. 2003-06-21. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  45. "Shared Parenting: Common Objections versus the Facts" (PDF). American Coalition of Fathers and Children: The Liberator Volume 32#3. Fall 2005. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  46. "HB 5267 Will Help Michigan's Children of Divorce". American Coalition of Fathers and Children (also Lansing State Journal). 2006-05-08 (printed in Lansing State Journal). Retrieved 2007-03-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  47. ^ "New York Times Press Gives Major Press Coverage for Fathers". Fathers & Families. 2005-05-08. Retrieved 2007-05-27.
  48. ^ Schlafly, Phyllis (2007-07-23). "Children's rights should include life with both parents". Retrieved 2007-09-30.
  49. McLoyd, V. C. (1998), "Socioeconomic Disadvantages and Child Development", American Psychologist, 53: 185–204{{citation}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  50. Hart, Craig H. (1999). "Combating the Myth that Parents Don't Matter". The Howard Center for Family Religion and Society. Retrieved 2007-03-28.
  51. "Deconstructing the Essential Father". SPARC. Retrieved 2007-09-22.
  52. ^ Baskerville, Stephen (Spring 2004). "Is There Really A Fatherhood Crisis?". The Independent Institute. Retrieved 2007-05-01.
  53. ^ Schlafly, Phyllis (2005-02-02). "The Fatherphobia of Family Courts". Retrieved 2007-04-24.
  54. Newdow, Michael (2004-06-18). "Family Feud". Slate.Com. Retrieved 2007-04-30.
  55. "An APPEAL to the PARENTS of AMERICA about the DESTRUCTION of the AMERICAN FAMILY" (PDF). American Coalition of Fathers and Children. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  56. "Testimony in Support of an Act Relative to Shared Parenting" (PDF). 2003-09-25. Retrieved 2007-10-14. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help)
  57. Baskerville, Stephen (2007). Taken Into Custody - The War Against Fathers, Marriage and the Family. Cumberland House. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Unknown parameter |comment= ignored (help)
  58. Govorun, Olesya (2002-11-21). "Joint-custody arrangements good for children of divorce -- but only if there is no parental conflict". Ohio State Research News.
  59. American Bar Association (2000), Guide to Family Law: Effect of Joint Custody, retrieved 2007-03-15
  60. Baskerville, Stephen (2007). Taken Into Custody - The War Against Fathers, Marriage and the Family. Cumberland House. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Unknown parameter |comment= ignored (help)
  61. Baskerville, Stephen (2007). Taken Into Custody - The War Against Fathers, Marriage and the Family. Cumberland House. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Unknown parameter |comment= ignored (help)
  62. Michigan National Organization for Women (1996), Mandated Joint Physical And Legal Custody Bill (– ), retrieved 2007-03-24 {{citation}}: External link in |format= (help)
  63. Callander, Debbi. "On Abuse, Shared Parenting, & the System". Retrieved 2007-03-24. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  64. "Fathers' Rights Are Fathers' Duties". FatherMag.Com. 1998–2000. Retrieved 2007-10-14.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  65. "Position Paper of Fathers & Families" (PDF). Fathers & Families. 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-06.
  66. ^ "Comments on the Child Support Guidelines". F.A.C.T. Fathers Are Capable Too: Parenting Association. Retrieved 2007-04-12.
  67. ^ "Recommendations for Child Support Guideline Revisement June, 2001". June 2001. Retrieved 2007-04-15.
  68. Wilson, KC (2004-09-15). "The Subversion of Child Support". IFeminists.Com. Retrieved 2007-03-17.
  69. Rogers, R. Mark (2001-05-05). "The "Cost Shares" Child Support Guideline: A Working, Superior Alternative" (PDF). Guideline Economics. Retrieved 2007-03-12. {{cite web}}: Text "To Current Guidelines" ignored (help)
  70. Morgan, Laura W. (2005-02-15). "The "Cost Share" model of child support guidelines". Retrieved 2007-03-24.
  71. Maldonado, Solangel (2006). "Deadbeat or Deadbroke: Redefining Child Support for Poor Fathers" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-06-21.
  72. ^ "Controlling Domestic Violence Against Men". Equal Justice Foundation. 2002. Retrieved 2007-10-04. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  73. "An Epidemic of Civil Rights Abuses: Ranking of States' Domestic Violence Laws" (PDF). Respecting accuracy in domestic abuse reporting. September 2006. Retrieved 2007-05-05.
  74. "Claims about Husband Battering". American Coalition of Fathers and Children also Omaha World Herald, Daytona. Summer 1999. Retrieved 2007-09-21. {{cite web}}: Text "Beach News-Journal and the Louisville Courier-Journal" ignored (help)
  75. ^ "October's Domestic Violence Awareness Month Ignores Many Victims". American Coalition of Fathers and Children also Omaha World Herald, Daytona. October 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-15. {{cite web}}: Text "Beach News-Journal and the Louisville Courier-Journal" ignored (help)
  76. "Equal Rights Amendment Yes, 'Women's Equality Amendment' No". GlennSacks.Com, also the Louisville Courier. October 2006. Retrieved 2007-04-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  77. Taft, Angela, Kelsey Hegarty and Michael Flood, 'Are men and women equally violent to intimate partners?' in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health Volume 25 Issue 6 Page 498-500, December 2001
  78. ^ Flood, Michael, 'The Debate Over Men’s Versus Women’s Family Violence' in Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Family Violence Conference, Adelaide, February 23rd to 24th, 2006
  79. Archer, John, 'Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scale: A meta-analytic review', Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(12), December 1999, pp. 1263-1289
  80. "Equal Parents Week Highlights Need for Family Court Reform". GlennSacks.Com also Lansing State Journal 2002-09-26. Retrieved 2007-03-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  81. "AB 400 Will Help Wisconsin's Children of Divorce". Glenn Sacks. 2005-06-17. Retrieved 2007-05-12. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthers= ignored (help)
  82. ^ "Protect Children from Alienation". Ifeminists.Com. 2006-07-12. Retrieved 2007-10-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  83. Bone, J. Michael (Fall/Winter 2003). "Parental Alienation Syndrome: Examining the Validity Amid Controversy". Parental-Alienation.Com - The Family Law Section, Vol. XX, No. 1, Fall/Winter 2003, p 24-27. Retrieved 2007-05-04. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  84. Hayward, Stan. "A GUIDE TO THE PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME". UK Men and Father's Rights. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  85. "Statement on Parental Alienation Syndrome". American Psychological Association. 2005-10-28. Retrieved 2007-03-11.
  86. ^ "Child Abuse Experts Applaud Legal Community for Rejecting Parental Alienation Syndrome" (Press release). The Leadership Council on Child Abuse and Interpersonal Violence. 2006-07-12. Retrieved 2007-03-12.
  87. "Unwarranted Adoptions". BBC. Retrieved 2007-06-05.
  88. "Choosing foster parents over fathers". The San Diego Union Tribune. 2007-07-11. Retrieved 2007-10-05. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  89. "Phyllis Schlafly's keynote address". American Coalition of Fathers and Children. September 2006. Retrieved 2007-05-12.
  90. "Bob Geldof". Shared Parenting Information Group (SPIG) UK. Retrieved 2007-05-01.
  91. "Welcome to California Shared Parenting Alliance". California Shared Parenting Alliance. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  92. "Family law reform helps children". Sunday Gazette Mail (West Virginia). Retrieved 2007-03-18. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

External links

Family rights
Elements
Rights movements
See also
Related
Categories: