| Revision as of 14:25, 7 September 2008 editBentecbye (talk | contribs)186 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:44, 7 September 2008 edit undoCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →memo: advise on your memoNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| == memo == | == memo == | ||
| Caspian blue,Manacpowers,Objectiveye,4.23.83.100,Kuebie,Eiimsine,Easternknight,Melonbarmonster2 | Caspian blue,Manacpowers,Objectiveye,4.23.83.100,Kuebie,Eiimsine,Easternknight,Melonbarmonster2 | ||
| I advise you. Although this is your talk page, but your addressing only people's name here, with whom you have been disputing is viewed as a "list of people you intend to attack". Also you advocate your point of view to others when people visit your page. That is a no-no and will be rather disadvantageous for your side. You would better remove the memo. Thanks.--] (]) 14:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:44, 7 September 2008
2008.8
1st of all, that is not a who kowtow page. 2nd, if you are not a sock of Pabopa, don't revert banned user's edit. if you are Pabopa, you are Banned edit in wikipedia.Manacpowers (talk) 09:44, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'm no Pabopa.You violated 3rr rule in Kowtow.--Bentecbye (talk) 10:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
about kofun
anyway, did you really read this (韓国全羅道地方の前方後円墳調査)? this is not mean "In recent years,many typical Japanese tumulus Kofun and jades was found in this area." no sentence like your claim. are you make hoax?Manacpowers (talk) 03:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Again, Your source is NOT mentioned that "many typical Japanese tumulus Kofun and jades was found in this area.". (韓国全羅道地方の前方後円墳調査)
frankly speaking, are you ret***? why you insert WRONG information by Unrelated Source? Manacpowers (talk) 03:31, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
are you liar?
- 韓国西南部の全羅南道から全羅北道にかけて、とくに栄山江流域を中心とする地域に分布している前方後円墳 many typical Japanese tumulus Kofun and jades was found in Jeolla.
korean source The Hankyoreh 2001.9.6--Bentecbye (talk) 03:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Wow. sorry. retar***. Your favored source said,] 古墳の近くには、3世紀以来築造された万家村古墳群がある。この古墳群は長方形ないし方台形の形状で周溝をもつのが特徴である。同じく周溝をもつ韓国の前方後円墳が、日本の前方後円墳に淵源をもつのではなく、韓半島独自の墓制として発展したとする学説の論拠になっている。
Your favored source do not say, that kofun invned in japan and spread to korea.Manacpowers (talk) 03:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
On the contrary, this scholar claims that That is the korean kofun and spread to Japan. That is not a Japanese invneted kofun. but Japanese scholar opposed this theory. anywasy, that Kofun is not invented in Japan. if Japanese use "Hanji", then Kanji invented in Japan? Manacpowers (talk) 03:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
It is explanation of one claim. Do not take up only one place.--Bentecbye (talk) 07:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
memo
Caspian blue,Manacpowers,Objectiveye,4.23.83.100,Kuebie,Eiimsine,Easternknight,Melonbarmonster2
I advise you. Although this is your talk page, but your addressing only people's name here, with whom you have been disputing is viewed as a "list of people you intend to attack". Also you advocate your point of view to others when people visit your page. That is a no-no and will be rather disadvantageous for your side. You would better remove the memo. Thanks.--Caspian blue (talk) 14:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)