Revision as of 19:04, 17 September 2008 editWordbuilder (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,066 edits Peace← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:53, 2 October 2008 edit undoCrispmuncher (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,911 edits →RS-232: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== Peace == | == Peace == | ||
] Hey, mate. I just wanted to make a gesture of peace regarding our ] disagreement. The image you added is probably the best one for that section and should replace the image of the non-functioning mill that is there now. →] (]) 19:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC) | ] Hey, mate. I just wanted to make a gesture of peace regarding our ] disagreement. The image you added is probably the best one for that section and should replace the image of the non-functioning mill that is there now. →] (]) 19:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
== RS-232 == | |||
I have again reverted your edits to the RS-232 article. If you have concerns please discuss them on the talk page as I have already requested. Your most recent edit reintroduced unsourced material that is directly contradicted by a citation and has not place in the article. Additionally, piping a link from 8250 to 16550 is an inappropriate link - Easter eggs links are contrary to the manual of style. Happy to discuss, but please, on the talk page. ] (]) 19:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:53, 2 October 2008
Binary Prefixes
- One thing I've learned...stick to your guns. --Wtshymanski 17
- 47, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Radio propagation
Thanks for the edits to Radio propagation. Just thought I'd say ... J. D. Redding 15:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, it needs more work yet - but it's sunny and +30 forecast for this weekend, so computer hobbies take a back seat for now. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Invention of Radio
You might like to contribute to the above article, where there is a certain amount of crackpottery concerning EM waves.Martin Hogbin (talk) 18:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Crackpottery abounds. I'll look, but my patience wears thin. Had to break someone of the notion that radio waves travel by conduction, for example. --Wtshymanski (talk)
User:Wtshymanski/Editcounter
I've moved the editcounter here; you accidentally created it in the mainspace. Ironholds 16:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- No problem :). In future just have User:Wtshymanski/SUBNAMEGOESHERE. The only difference would be if you were including a subpage into your userpage, in which case it would just be /SUBNAMEGOESHERE. Ironholds 17:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Request for comment
Your opinion on hardware inclusion criterion is requested on the Personal Computer discussion page. Alatari (talk) 20:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Peace
Hey, mate. I just wanted to make a gesture of peace regarding our windmill disagreement. The image you added is probably the best one for that section and should replace the image of the non-functioning mill that is there now. →Wordbuilder (talk) 19:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
RS-232
I have again reverted your edits to the RS-232 article. If you have concerns please discuss them on the talk page as I have already requested. Your most recent edit reintroduced unsourced material that is directly contradicted by a citation and has not place in the article. Additionally, piping a link from 8250 to 16550 is an inappropriate link - Easter eggs links are contrary to the manual of style. Happy to discuss, but please, on the talk page. CrispMuncher (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)