| Revision as of 17:30, 18 September 2008 editIan13 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,881 editsm Protected User talk:Ian13: revert test by self ← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:34, 18 September 2008 edit undoIan13 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,881 edits ←Created page with 'test'Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| test | |||
| {| style="border:2px solid #99B; font-size:0.9em; background:#f9f9f9; width:90%;" align="center" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" | ] | |||
| | | |||
| *Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). If you're new to Misplaced Pages, please see ] and ]. | |||
| *I will reply to messages left here below your comment, not on your talk page. | |||
| {{hidden|Archives| | |||
| * ] <small>(''31 October 2005 - 23 December 2005'')</small> | |||
| * ] <small>(''23 December 2005 - 31 December 2005'')</small> | |||
| * ] <small>(''31 December 2005 - 16 January 2006'')</small> | |||
| * ] <small>(''18 January 2006 - 3 March 2006'')</small> | |||
| * ] <small>(''3 March 2006 - 18 April 2006'')</small> | |||
| * ] <small>(''22 April 2006 - 26 May 2006'')</small> | |||
| * ] <small>(''26 May 2006 - 7 June 2006'')</small> | |||
| * ] <small>(''7 June 2006 - 21 July 2006'')</small> | |||
| * ] <small>(''22 July 2006 - 1 November 2006'')</small> | |||
| * ] <small>(''29 November 2006 - 22 June 2008'')</small> | |||
| <hr> | |||
| {{Autoarchivingnotice|bot=MiszaBot III|age=3}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 40K | |||
| |counter = 12 | |||
| |algo = old(72h) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Ian13/Archive%(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| }} | |||
| |} | |||
| __NOINDEX__ | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Is there any way to speed up the process and move ], or do I need to wait a week? --] 01:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :The page was created (almost 3 years ago!) as a copyvio, and has gone largely unchanged, so was valid for immediate deletion under CSD G12. However, I held off, and instead posted a full copyvio notice to encourage its recreation. Given this has happened, I am more than happy to go ahead and move it. I must say, excellent work. You have made a useful article from nothing in a very short time. | |||
| :While I'm talking to you, your ] page concerns me. It appears to be public domain, which is fine, however sometimes, copyright can be claimed from the transcription. I'm no expert in this field, but if you didn't type it up from the book, or a faithful image of the page, I think it may need to be deleted. | |||
| :Cheers, ]] 18:03, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's not a direct copy-paste from the transcription; where possible I used the page images, and otherwise I corrected OCR errors. The text is as it was published by the ICC. --] 18:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::That's cool. Just wanted to make sure. Good work :) ]] 22:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Nek == | |||
| Thank you for ''In Due'' cover.<br>] (]) 10:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :No problem, ]] 10:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Sceptre's talk page == | |||
| What was the reason to '''' the past three days of comments on Sceptre's talk page to that archive page? Now that the talk page is blanked there's no hint at that archive and the edits are not in the history of the talk page either. Was there any particular reason to hide those last 3 days of comments like that? <span style="font-family:lucida sans, console;">''''']:]'''''</span> 08:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I moved the comments to the archive per user request , courtesy blanked the archive link (with a direct link to the previous revision ), and posted a notice at the bottom of the main talk page linking both to the new archive page and to a direct diff for the 3 month block notice (yes, that IP was me sorry). However, I did not blank the main talk page (that was done by ] . I hope that helps. ]] 17:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ok, thanks. Hadn't seen . (Still seems a bit unusual, seeing as the entire main user talk history is kept in place except for those last few days. Oh well, none of my business.) <span style="font-family:lucida sans, console;">''''']:]'''''</span> 17:27, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Help required !!! == | |||
| Hello, I urgently require some help from you. Actually, a user uploaded an Image ] on the ] article, and released it under the Public domain. But however, when I checked the Individual articles on them, no free Images were present. I checked the entire Wikimedia Commons but those images were not found. That means these are copyrighted images copied from other websites, and then merged into a bigger Image. Is it allowed as per WIKIpolicies. I have contacted you since you are an administrator. Thanks, ] (]) 11:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :It's likely you are correct and it is a copy-vio as a derivative work of copyrighted material. I have tagged the image as needing sources, and evidence of permission from those sources. They have one week to respond and fully tag the images, else it will be deleted. You can actually do this yourself using {{tl|di-no source}} and {{tl|di-no permission}}. I hope this helps. ]] 11:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thankyou for your reply..One more copyright violation - ] on ] article. (3 out of 6 images are not free) (IMG 3,5,6). ] (]) 11:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::All tagged up. ]] 11:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Could you please delete ] immediately. This was uploaded by me when I didn't have enough knowledge of free Images. It is a 100% copyrighted image. Thanks, ] (]) 11:31, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Vanished. Cheers, ]] 11:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I have a question regarding an Image. Hope you don't mind!!! ] (]) 11:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sure, ask away. ]] 11:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::If you check ], the website has declared the Image free in their blog (http://www.kamat.com/vikas/blog.php?BlogID=783). Is a Non-free use media rationale required for the Image then? Is there any alternate Creative Commons licensing tag. Thanks, ] (]) 11:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Um, well, permission alone is not sufficient. This is because images from Misplaced Pages are used elsewhere. We require that images are either licenced under a free licence (GFDL, cc-by-sa etc., and it must allow commercial use), or meet US fair-use criteria. Because of this, yes, a rationale is probably needed as we are using the image under a claim of fair-use due to the absence of a free licence. ]] 12:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Can't I use ] for the ] article? A Non-free image can be used for a limited no of articles. Thanks, ] (]) 17:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sadly not. On each of the articles that a non-free image is used, for the fair-use claim to be valid it must not be replaceable with a free image. In the case of ], the image was being used to represent a typical or well-known follower, however there are alternative persons, some of whom are alive. Any person who is alive is automatically seen to have replaceable images on the basis that you can just go and take one yourself (despite how infeasible this may be), invalidating any claim that you can use another's copyrighted work. So, in this instance, it is likely that the image is replaceable with a free alternative, and therefore fails ] #1. ]] 20:42, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello, may I know why was the image deleted? The copyright issues were discussed earlier and were approved by ], an experienced image reviewer at WP:FAC. --''']'''] 15:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, the nomination said "the picture does nothing to significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic" (] #8), and this is something I agreed with. Where it was used in the article ''(])'', I saw no specific commentary about the image, and failed to see that a readers understanding of the topic could be increased by looking at that image. If you can link me to the relevent WP:FAC discussion, I'll be happy to take a look. ]] 15:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == why == | |||
| did you delete the page about charae carter? she was a contestant for a national pageant that is well known (miss america) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :I deleted ] as there was little indication of notability, and has few/no potential secondary sources. With regards to her being well known, doesn't think so, with only 17 results, all passing references, and it seems like they aren't all even about the article's subject. Cheers, (editconflict) ]] 20:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::There are articles up about dionte johnson and ernie wheelwright, also from columbus ohio, and those aren't people that you would find in an encyclopedia? what is this rule, articles can't be about real people, then who are the articles about? ] (]) 20:02, 17 September 2008 (UTC). | |||
| :::The people you cited seem more , amongst other things. Please take a look at ] to discover our notability criteria, and see ] for information why we need lots of reliable sources about living persons in particular. Cheers, ]] 20:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:34, 18 September 2008
test