Misplaced Pages

User talk:Animum: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:24, 29 September 2008 editAitias (talk | contribs)Rollbackers50,076 edits →User:Animum/easyblock.js: another problem...← Previous edit Revision as of 21:24, 29 September 2008 edit undoAnimum (talk | contribs)30,489 editsm →User:Animum/easyblock.js: reply, thanksNext edit →
Line 31: Line 31:


Hey. I'm very sorry, but I have a problem again. :( There is a new blocking option “''cannot edit own talk page''”. When blocking an user/an IP with your script this seems to be enabled per default. Thus I received from ] at my talk page. He advised me to have a look at ] at the ]. There it says that this new blocking option should just enabled in rare cases (i.e. continued disruptive editing during a block). So, is there any possibility to disable this new blocking option per default? That would be great. :) Thank you, —] ''•'']''•'' 13:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Hey. I'm very sorry, but I have a problem again. :( There is a new blocking option “''cannot edit own talk page''”. When blocking an user/an IP with your script this seems to be enabled per default. Thus I received from ] at my talk page. He advised me to have a look at ] at the ]. There it says that this new blocking option should just enabled in rare cases (i.e. continued disruptive editing during a block). So, is there any possibility to disable this new blocking option per default? That would be great. :) Thank you, —] ''•'']''•'' 13:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
:Ah, yes. If a parameter is not specified in the data the script sends to the servers, index.php evidently interprets it as saying "no" to the option the parameter can enable; thus, if I do not specify a value for the "wpAllowUsertalk" parameter (which determines whether the blocked user can edit his own talk page), the servers will interpret it as saying "&wpAllowUsertalk=0", which would disable editing of a user's talk page. Technical jargon aside, thanks for telling me this, and it has been {{tick|18}} '''fixed'''. —] <small>(])</small> 21:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


== Image:Magnus_logo.png listed for deletion == == Image:Magnus_logo.png listed for deletion ==

Revision as of 21:24, 29 September 2008


Welcome to Animum's talk page


ArchivesThis talk page is automatically archived by ClueBot III. Threads with no replies in 3 days may be automatically moved.

Archives
(index)

2007
  1. January and February
  2. March
  3. April
  4. May
  5. June
  6. July
  7. August
  8. September
  9. October
  10. November
  11. December
2008
  1. January
  2. February
  3. March
  4. April
  5. May
  6. June
  7. July
  8. August
  9. September
  10. October
  11. November
  12. December
2009
  1. January
  2. February
  3. March
  4. April
  5. May
  6. June
  7. July
  8. August
  9. September
  10. October
  11. November
  12. December
2010
  1. January
  2. February
  3. March
  4. April
  5. May
  6. June
  7. July


User:Animum/easyblock.js

Hey Animum. :) Whenever I block an IP/user with your script the user(talk)page is added to my watchlist. Is there any possibility to disable that? Best wishes, —αἰτίας •discussion• 23:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

checkY Done —Animum (talk) 01:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. :) —αἰτίας •discussion• 18:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


Hey. I'm very sorry, but I have a problem again. :( There is a new blocking option “cannot edit own talk page”. When blocking an user/an IP with your script this seems to be enabled per default. Thus I received this message from User:zzuuzz at my talk page. He advised me to have a look at this thread at the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard. There it says that this new blocking option should just enabled in rare cases (i.e. continued disruptive editing during a block). So, is there any possibility to disable this new blocking option per default? That would be great. :) Thank you, —αἰτίας •discussion• 13:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Ah, yes. If a parameter is not specified in the data the script sends to the servers, index.php evidently interprets it as saying "no" to the option the parameter can enable; thus, if I do not specify a value for the "wpAllowUsertalk" parameter (which determines whether the blocked user can edit his own talk page), the servers will interpret it as saying "&wpAllowUsertalk=0", which would disable editing of a user's talk page. Technical jargon aside, thanks for telling me this, and it has been checkY fixed. —Animum (talk) 21:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Magnus_logo.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Magnus_logo.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton 18:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC)