| Revision as of 22:49, 30 September 2005 editFastfission (talk | contribs)17,173 edits rv again. you realize that just inserting the same information every day isn't going to make it change, don't you? discuss this on talk before re-inserting it, please.← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:41, 28 October 2005 edit undoMerovingian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users54,218 editsm →External linksNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| His published works include ''Evolutionary Anthropology'' (], with Edward Staski), ''Human Biodiversity'' (]), and ''What It Means to be 98% Chimpanzee'' (]), and many scholarly articles and essays. He is an outspoken critic of what he considers to be ], and has prominently argued against the idea of a genetic basis "]", though he believes that so-called racial categories do have some value to the science of ]. | His published works include ''Evolutionary Anthropology'' (], with Edward Staski), ''Human Biodiversity'' (]), and ''What It Means to be 98% Chimpanzee'' (]), and many scholarly articles and essays. He is an outspoken critic of what he considers to be ], and has prominently argued against the idea of a genetic basis "]", though he believes that so-called racial categories do have some value to the science of ]. | ||
| ==External |
==External link== | ||
| * | * | ||
Revision as of 11:41, 28 October 2005
Jonathan Marks is a biological anthropologist at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Born in 1955, he studied at the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and took graduate degrees in genetics and anthropology from the University of Arizona, completing his doctorate in 1984. He did post-doctoral research in the genetics department at UC-Davis from 1984-1987, then taught at Yale for 10 years and Berkeley for 3, before settling in Charlotte.
His published works include Evolutionary Anthropology (1991, with Edward Staski), Human Biodiversity (1995), and What It Means to be 98% Chimpanzee (2002), and many scholarly articles and essays. He is an outspoken critic of what he considers to be scientific racism, and has prominently argued against the idea of a genetic basis "race", though he believes that so-called racial categories do have some value to the science of forensic anthropology.
External link
 | This article about an anthropologist is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |