Misplaced Pages

:Requests for adminship/23skidoo: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:42, 30 September 2005 editJossi (talk | contribs)72,880 editsm []← Previous edit Revision as of 23:48, 30 September 2005 edit undoZzyzx11 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators163,727 edits supportNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
#'''Support''', good editor. ] 23:39, 30 September 2005 (UTC) #'''Support''', good editor. ] 23:39, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
#'''Support''', as per nom (hope he accepts...) ] 23:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC) #'''Support''', as per nom (hope he accepts...) ] 23:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Very good contributor. ] ] 23:48, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

'''Oppose''' '''Oppose'''
# #

Revision as of 23:48, 30 September 2005

23skidoo

Vote here (5/0/0) ending 20:57 October 7, 2005 (UTC)

23skidoo (talk · contribs) – 23skidoo first joined us on January 4, 2003— since then, he has amassed over 11,000 edits , nearly 9,000 of which have been to the Article Namespace. He is also a frequent contributor to the daily discussions at Articles for Deletion and other community-related discussions and holds approximately 900 edits in the Misplaced Pages Namespace. When not helping with Misplaced Pages, he works as a freelance journalist and book editor which is a definite plus. That said, I believe 23skidoo to be an exceptional candidate for adminship and give him my strongest possible support. Hall Monitor 20:57, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

  1. Strong support. Pardon the cliché, but I thought he was one already. Hall Monitor 21:05, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  2. Support strong contributor --TimPope 21:08, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  3. Support - a consistent contributor who would well wield a mop. -- BDAbramson 21:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  4. Strong Support I knew he wasn't one, but I never understood why ; - ) Redwolf24 (talk) 22:30, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  5. Support. JYolkowski // talk 22:46, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  6. Support — consestent editor (plus, I trust the nominator). →Journalist >>talk<< 23:34, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  7. Support, good editor. Private Butcher 23:39, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  8. Support, as per nom (hope he accepts...) ≈ jossi ≈ 23:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  9. Support Very good contributor. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:48, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A.