Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:12, 19 October 2008 editWknight94 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users89,452 edits (clerk) Archive← Previous edit Revision as of 18:31, 8 January 2009 edit undoWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 edits more sockingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Possible ResearchEditor sockpuppets. All added the exact same information and citations to multiple pages using a series of throwaway accounts. The POV and sources suggest RE, promoting the discredited idea that there's any weight to the ] moral panic, the use of the ] (G4 speedied as a recreation of the ] with an AFD ]) and Randy Noblitt's discredited beliefs about satanic ritual abuse. All are ] that have only one topic's worth of edits, and redlinked talk and user pages. If it's not RE, then I would be very surprised, and even if not I can't concieve that it's not someone else sockpuppeting. If not RFCU-ed, accounts should probably be blocked anyway for ].

* {{userlinks|Brewopco}} to ]
* {{userlinks|Turtleshell2go}} to ]
* {{userlinks|Raspla42}} to ]
* {{userlinks|Msbvben}} to ]
* {{userlinks|Donrus22}} to ]
* {{userlinks|Reccaban2}} to ]
* {{userlinks|Nmpras}} to ]
* {{userlinks|Burgelt}} to ]

* {{userlinks|Tn25dog}} is the creator of the ] page, and may also be a sock.

That seems to be the lot. ] <small>] ] Misplaced Pages's rules:</small>]/] 18:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude> <!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>
<!-- <!--

Revision as of 18:31, 8 January 2009

Possible ResearchEditor sockpuppets. All added the exact same information and citations to multiple pages using a series of throwaway accounts. The POV and sources suggest RE, promoting the discredited idea that there's any weight to the satanic ritual abuse moral panic, the use of the extreme abuse surveys (G4 speedied as a recreation of the Extreme Abuse Survey with an AFD here) and Randy Noblitt's discredited beliefs about satanic ritual abuse. All are single-purpose accounts that have only one topic's worth of edits, and redlinked talk and user pages. If it's not RE, then I would be very surprised, and even if not I can't concieve that it's not someone else sockpuppeting. If not RFCU-ed, accounts should probably be blocked anyway for spamming.

That seems to be the lot. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/complex 18:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

ResearchEditor

request links: mainedit • links • history • watch
Filed: 14:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
As I mentioned on the talk page of the relevant entry, can you check out the following two users against all those listed above as well so we can clear the air completely regarding new single purpose accounts pushing RE's POV post ResearchEditor's topic ban.
Thanks.PelleSmith (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
IP Red X Unrelated.  Confirmed that Attafire (talk · contribs) = Previewriver (talk · contribs) = Raorino (talk · contribs). Highly  Likely that they are all ResearchEditor (talk · contribs) – same home ISP in same town. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 00:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.