| Revision as of 16:44, 5 October 2005 editFeloniousMonk (talk | contribs)18,409 edits Removed the bias template and why | Revision as of 12:42, 13 December 2005 edit undoLao Wai (talk | contribs)2,380 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Bias template== | ==Bias template== | ||
| I've removed the bias template as being unjustified. The statements made in the article are backed up by evidence provided in other articles, namely ]. That's not to say the article's language is encyclopedic or that it conforms to ]. It could use some wikifying in those regards, but the claim of bias does not hold up in light of the evidence presented elsewhere. ] 16:44, 5 October 2005 (UTC) | I've removed the bias template as being unjustified. The statements made in the article are backed up by evidence provided in other articles, namely ]. That's not to say the article's language is encyclopedic or that it conforms to ]. It could use some wikifying in those regards, but the claim of bias does not hold up in light of the evidence presented elsewhere. ] 16:44, 5 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :I do not see how classifying Min Zhu as a rapist or putting him in the incest category is justified. I have seen the WebEx article. It contains allegations by a former business partner and, how does one put it?, colorful personality, Mikhail Zeleny. An allegation is not proof. Min Zhu is entitled to a presumption of innocence. So all we have is some allegations made on the internet by Mikhail Z and his former girlfriend, Erin Zhu, about her father. Does not make him a rapist. Misplaced Pages should not leap to judge. ] 12:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:42, 13 December 2005
Bias template
I've removed the bias template as being unjustified. The statements made in the article are backed up by evidence provided in other articles, namely WebEx. That's not to say the article's language is encyclopedic or that it conforms to WP:MOS. It could use some wikifying in those regards, but the claim of bias does not hold up in light of the evidence presented elsewhere. FeloniousMonk 16:44, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- I do not see how classifying Min Zhu as a rapist or putting him in the incest category is justified. I have seen the WebEx article. It contains allegations by a former business partner and, how does one put it?, colorful personality, Mikhail Zeleny. An allegation is not proof. Min Zhu is entitled to a presumption of innocence. So all we have is some allegations made on the internet by Mikhail Z and his former girlfriend, Erin Zhu, about her father. Does not make him a rapist. Misplaced Pages should not leap to judge. Lao Wai 12:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC)