Misplaced Pages

User talk:Britte: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:08, 29 October 2008 editBefore My Ken (talk | contribs)42,112 edits October 2008← Previous edit Revision as of 01:12, 29 October 2008 edit undoBritte (talk | contribs)1,426 edits rvt Ed Fitzgerald, potentially violating guidelineNext edit →
Line 143: Line 143:
== October 2008 == == October 2008 ==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Claudette Colbert|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''The policy ] covers those instances where an editor continues to arbitrarily make reversions which amount to edit warring. You have made arbitrary reversions on this article at least three times in the last 24 hours, which violates the spirit of 3RR. Adminstrators look at the spirit of the reversions and act accordingly, a 4th reversion may not be necessary if it is determined that the reversions are being done tenditiously. Please either engage in discussion regarding changes to this page and stop attempting to force your perspective on issues around the opinions of other editors. '' ] (]) 01:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC) ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Claudette Colbert|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''The policy ] covers those instances where an editor continues to arbitrarily make reversions which amount to edit warring. You have made arbitrary reversions on this article at least three times in the last 24 hours, which violates the spirit of 3RR. Adminstrators look at the spirit of the reversions and act accordingly, a 4th reversion may not be necessary if it is determined that the reversions are being done tenditiously. Please either engage in discussion regarding changes to this page and stop attempting to force your perspective on issues around the opinions of other editors. '' ] (]) 01:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

==Some friendly advice==
I see that you're a relatively new editor -- your contribution list shows that your first edit was on October 8th -- so perhaps you're unfamiliar with the way things work on Misplaced Pages. If you make a change to an article, like the changes you made to ] and ] without first discussing those changes, and other editor disagree with your alterations, the thing to do is '''''not''''' to revert those changes back, but to engage those editors in discussion on the article's talk page. Leave the article in the condition it was in, and talk about what you want to do -- you'd be surprised how often a little friendly talk will get you what you wanted, or a compromise that all parties can live with.<p>So, please stop reverting, and start discussing. Deleting comments from your talk page with "disagree" in the edit summary is not discussion, please go to the article talk pages and engage the other editors there. Thanks. <b><i>]</i> <sub>] / ]</sub></b> 01:07, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:12, 29 October 2008

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Britte, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Longhair\ 22:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Paris Hilton

Hi
Thanks for you work on the Paris Hilton article. In the future though, could you please try to use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made or any other changes you want to make, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history.
Thanks & Cheers, Amalthea 12:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Guide to referencing

Click on "show" on the right of the orange bar to open contents.

Using references (citations)
Help another user by posting this to them. Put {{subst:refstart}} on their talk page or a relevant article talk page.
Alternatively, use the link WP:REFB, which goes to a help page.

I thought you might find it useful to have some information about references (refs) on wikipedia. These are important to validate your writing and inform the reader. Any editor can remove unreferenced material; and unsubstantiated articles may end up getting deleted, so when you add something to an article, it's highly advisable to also include a reference to say where it came from. Referencing may look daunting, but it's easy enough to do. Here's a guide to getting started. If you need any assistance, let me know. -- Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Good references

A reference must be accurate, i.e. it must prove the statement in the text. To validate "Mike Brown climbed Everest", it's no good linking to a page about Everest, if Mike Brown isn't mentioned, nor to one on Mike Brown, if it doesn't say that he climbed Everest. You have to link to a source that proves his achievement is true. You must use reliable sources, such as published books, mainstream press, and authorised web sites. Blogs, Myspace, Youtube, fan sites and extreme minority texts are not usually acceptable, nor is original research (e.g. your own unpublished, or self-published, essay or research), or another wikipedia article.

Inserting a reference

The first thing you have to do is to create a "Notes and references" section (unless it already exists). This goes towards the bottom of the page, below the "See also" section and above the "External links" section. Enter this code:

==Notes and references==
{{reflist}}

The next step is to put a reference in the text. Here is the code to do that. It goes at the end of the relevant term, phrase, sentence, or paragraph to which the note refers, and after punctuation such as a full stop, without a space (to prevent separation through line wrap):

<ref>             </ref>

Whatever text you put in between these two tags will become visible in the "Notes and references" section as your reference.

Test it out

Open the edit box for this page, copy the following text (inserting your own text where indicated), paste it at the bottom of the page and save the page:

==Reference test==
This is the text which you are going to verify with a reference.<ref>Reference details go here</ref>
==Notes and references==
{{reflist}}

(End of text to copy and paste.)

It should appear like this:

Reference test
This is the text which you are going to verify with a reference.
Notes and references
  1. Reference details go here
Information to include

You need to include the information to enable the reader to find your source. For an online newspaper source, it might look like this:

<ref>Plunkett, John. , '']'', 2005-10-27. Retrieved on 2005-10-27.</ref>

When uploaded, it appears as:

Plunkett, John. "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying", The Guardian, 2005-10-27. Retrieved on 2005-10-27.

Note the single square brackets around the URL and the article title. The format is:

Make sure there is a space between the URL and the Title. This code results in the URL being hidden and the title showing as a link. Use double apostrophes for the article title (it is quoted text), and two single quote marks either side of the name of the paper (to generate italics). Double square brackets round the name of the paper create an internal link (a wikilink) to the relevant wikipedia article. Apostrophes must go outside the brackets.

The date after The Guardian is the date of the newspaper, and the date after "Retrieved on" is the date you accessed the site – useful for searching the web archive in case the link goes dead.

References not online

You can use sources which are not online, but which you have found in a library or elsewhere—in which case leave out the information which is not relevant. The newspaper example above would be formatted like this:

<ref>Plunkett, John. "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying", '']'', 2005-10-27.</ref>

When uploaded, it appears as:

Plunkett, John. "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying", The Guardian, 2005-10-27.

Here is an example for a book:

<ref>Charmley, John (2006). ''The Princess and the Politicians'', p.60. Penguin Books Ltd., London. ISBN 0140289712.</ref>

When uploaded, it appears as:

Charmley, John (2006). The Princess and the Politicians. Penguin Books Ltd., London. ISBN 0140289712.

Make sure you put two single quote marks round the title (to generate italics), rather than one double quote mark.

Date format

These formats are all acceptable for dates:

2005-01-27
27 January 2007
January 27, 2007
Citation templates

You may prefer to use a citation template to compile details of the source. The template goes between the ref tags and you fill out the fields you wish to. Basic templates can be found here: Misplaced Pages:Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference

Same ref used twice or more

The first time a reference appears in the article, you can give it a simple name in the <ref> code:

<ref name=smith>Details of ref here</ref>

The second time you use the same reference in the article, you need only to create a short cut instead of typing it all out again:

<ref name=smith/>

You can then use the short cut as many times as you want. Don't forget the /, or it will blank the rest of the article! Some symbols don't work in the ref name, but you'll find out if you use them.

You can see multiple use of the same refs in action in the article William Bowyer (artist). There are 3 sources and they are each referenced 3 times. Each statement in the article has a footnote to show what its source is.

Alternative system

The above method is simple and combines references and notes into one section. A refinement is to put the full details of the references in their own section headed "References", while the notes which apply to them appear in a separate section headed "Notes". The notes can be inserted in the main article text in an abbreviated form as seen in Harriet Arbuthnot or in a full form as in Brown Dog affair.

Further information

More information can be found at:

I thought this might be helpful to you when adding references to articles. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Claudette Colbert. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. The policy WP:3RR covers those instances where an editor continues to arbitrarily make reversions which amount to edit warring. You have made arbitrary reversions on this article at least three times in the last 24 hours, which violates the spirit of 3RR. Adminstrators look at the spirit of the reversions and act accordingly, a 4th reversion may not be necessary if it is determined that the reversions are being done tenditiously. Please either engage in discussion regarding changes to this page and stop attempting to force your perspective on issues around the opinions of other editors. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)