Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:00, 7 November 2008

your edits

Your edits are usually POV, always poorly written and from strange sources if at all. Don't be surprised that so many other editors revert your edits. Blanking all your warnings doesn't lose that history, either. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 05:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Geisha

Other editors asked you to discuss about your recent edits on the talk page. Ask for consensus before you change the article again. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 06:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. but i can't understand why you delete sourced material. Please give me a reason that why you delete sourced material. if you disagree it, then you should add counterpart source.Masonfamily (talk) 06:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't work that way. If someone is an unknown author/dismissed as talking trash by the academic majority, no one is going to bother to take the time to debunk the theory/view. John Smith's (talk) 08:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

I've read your sources. Your edit was copy vio again from the first source text page 3 line 7 and 8. And it was a description on oiran/tayu, not on geisha. The third source you provided says geisha are not prostitute. So please do not add the material again. And why did you remove this before you answer my question? Now I explain my revert. Please explain your edit and answer my question. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 09:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Please read this and this. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 09:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Yakiniku

Hi again. Did you read the source carefully. It says '江戸時代になっても多くの人が肉を食べていた。' and 'しかし、現実には天明から嘉永にかけて、彦根城主から将軍へ、寒中見舞として牛肉の味噌漬が樽で献上されていたとの記録が残されている。' etc. BTW, I don't know who added but the source is not mine. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 06:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

According to your addition, it looks like Japanese didn't eat meat at all before Meiji era. But it was not. So I just think it would be appropriate to mention about it precisely. I've got to go now and if you have any question, I cannot answer immediately. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 06:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Please read these. , . , ja:牛肉 and ja:ももんじ屋. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 09:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but I reverted your edit. Please add an accurate information. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 19:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

"Wikistalking"

I disagree with most of your edits so I revert them. I have an interest in Japanese and other East Asian pages. If, for example, you go and edit articles on Barrack Obama, burgers or Swedish history I will have no reason to take an interest in your work. John Smith's (talk) 19:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

3RR warnings

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Yakiniku. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Kumdo. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Yamato period. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)