| Revision as of 22:58, 12 November 2008 editRoux (talk | contribs)23,636 edits →Discussion: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:00, 12 November 2008 edit undoCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →DiscussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| *I have a question before signing my name and proceeding the meditation. The reason for the meditation is still so obscure and is not stated by {{User|Bukubku}} at all unlike his self-claim that he has tried to meditate a dispute. Clearly, the process is not initiated by Bukubku but Durova. I only found his allegation via his forum shopping to admins and two bogus ANI reports because the user has refused to address his concern to the pertinent talk page. Nobody at ] agreed with the stance of Bukubku that I inserted "racist contents" and the use had lied that my sources (actually creator's sources) are non-existent. After I opened a discussion and provided in-line sources, the user was very calm unlike his noisy activities for 5 days. His intention can be viewed that {{User|Bukubku}} is not interested in resolving the dispute, but to defame me with various dishonest allegation to ANI. Since I provided inline sources that Bukubku demanded, he did not reject any of my sources. So what else should we have to do for the article? Tell me, Bukubku.--] 19:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | *I have a question before signing my name and proceeding the meditation. The reason for the meditation is still so obscure and is not stated by {{User|Bukubku}} at all unlike his self-claim that he has tried to meditate a dispute. Clearly, the process is not initiated by Bukubku but Durova. I only found his allegation via his forum shopping to admins and two bogus ANI reports because the user has refused to address his concern to the pertinent talk page. Nobody at ] agreed with the stance of Bukubku that I inserted "racist contents" and the use had lied that my sources (actually creator's sources) are non-existent. After I opened a discussion and provided in-line sources, the user was very calm unlike his noisy activities for 5 days. His intention can be viewed that {{User|Bukubku}} is not interested in resolving the dispute, but to defame me with various dishonest allegation to ANI. Since I provided inline sources that Bukubku demanded, he did not reject any of my sources. So what else should we have to do for the article? Tell me, Bukubku.--] 19:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :There. Now please remove all the attacks and incivility from your question. After you have done so, you may remove this comment. ]''' » ]] 22:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | :There. Now please remove all the attacks and incivility from your question. After you have done so, you may remove this comment. ]''' » ]] 22:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Please remove such insulting assessment as well if you want to rewrite the question.--] 23:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:00, 12 November 2008
| Misplaced Pages Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Article | Woo Jang-choon |
| Status | open |
| Request date | 00:58, 6 November 2008 (UTC) |
| Requesting party | Unknown |
| Parties involved | Caspian blue and Bukubku |
| Mediator(s) | |
| Comment | opening case, notifying participants |
]]
- Note: Please limit posts to this page to brief statements about the nature of the dispute until a volunteer adopts the case. Keep ongoing discussions about the topic to the appropriate talk page(s), but feel free to provide links to the talk page(s) where discussion has happened (and may be ongoing) for the convenience of the informal mediator and other parties. This will help keep discussion from fragmenting out across more pages and make it easier for a volunteer to review the case. Thanks!
Request details
Who are the involved parties?
What's going on?
A content/sourcing dispute with dimensions of Korean and Japanese nationalism.
What would you like to change about that?
Disputing parties have been advised at ANI to seek dispute resolution. Filing the request as an uninvolved party in the hope it helps the situation.
Mediator notes
Hi. I have opened this case. 23:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
A few ground rules:
- I will create sections for each party to comment in. Please address all your comments to me, and not to the other participants.
- Please keep your statements at 200 words or less, unless asked otherwise.
- Please keep all comments on facts, and not on the past, present, or future behaviour of any other users
- All participants are asked to refrain from any editing of the disputed article, the disputed article's talk page, or each other's talk pages until the case is concluded. Any vandalism to the article will be caught by vandalism patrollers, so don't worry about that either.
- I reserve the right to edit any comments or statements which don't fit within these guidelines.
- MedCab is not a formal part of the dispute resolution process, and cannot provide binding sanctions. Nevertheless, I ask that everyone involved agree to:
- Abide by the outcome of this case
- Immediately move to the next phase of dispute resolution if you are unable to agree with the final outcome
Please sign just your username below, with four tildes (~~~~) to indicate your agreement with the ground rules and your participation in the case.
Administrative notes
Discussion
- I have a question before signing my name and proceeding the meditation. The reason for the meditation is still so obscure and is not stated by Bukubku (talk · contribs) at all unlike his self-claim that he has tried to meditate a dispute. Clearly, the process is not initiated by Bukubku but Durova. I only found his allegation via his forum shopping to admins and two bogus ANI reports because the user has refused to address his concern to the pertinent talk page. Nobody at WT:JA agreed with the stance of Bukubku that I inserted "racist contents" and the use had lied that my sources (actually creator's sources) are non-existent. After I opened a discussion and provided in-line sources, the user was very calm unlike his noisy activities for 5 days. His intention can be viewed that Bukubku (talk · contribs) is not interested in resolving the dispute, but to defame me with various dishonest allegation to ANI. Since I provided inline sources that Bukubku demanded, he did not reject any of my sources. So what else should we have to do for the article? Tell me, Bukubku.--Caspian blue 19:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- There. Now please remove all the attacks and incivility from your question. After you have done so, you may remove this comment. 22:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Please remove such insulting assessment as well if you want to rewrite the question.--Caspian blue 23:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)