Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for arbitration/Eastern European disputes/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration | Eastern European disputes Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:48, 16 November 2008 editSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,314 edits →Clerical comments on the proposed decision: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 22:49, 16 November 2008 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,314 editsm →Clerical comments on the proposed decision: rephrase "context" to "subject matter" in my commentNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
If I may, a few suggestions: If I may, a few suggestions:
* In finding 4, "Regrettable" should not be capitalised. * In finding 4, "Regrettable" should not be capitalised.
* In finding 6.1, "the Russian regime" should read "the Russian government", because the choice of the pejorative (to my ears) term "]" may create the appearance of prejudice, particularly given the context of the case. * In finding 6.1, "the Russian regime" should read "the Russian government", because the choice of the pejorative (to my ears) term "]" may create the appearance of prejudice, particularly given the subject matter of the case.
* In finding 10, I suggest that "fear-mongering" be replaced with a term more in keeping with the measured tone expected from an Arbitration Committee decision. * In finding 10, I suggest that "fear-mongering" be replaced with a term more in keeping with the measured tone expected from an Arbitration Committee decision.
I have no opinion on the merits of the case, or of the proposed decision. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC) I have no opinion on the merits of the case, or of the proposed decision. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:49, 16 November 2008

Arbitrators active on this case

To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators. If updates to this listing do not immediately show, try purging the cache.

Clerical comments on the proposed decision

If I may, a few suggestions:

  • In finding 4, "Regrettable" should not be capitalised.
  • In finding 6.1, "the Russian regime" should read "the Russian government", because the choice of the pejorative (to my ears) term "regime" may create the appearance of prejudice, particularly given the subject matter of the case.
  • In finding 10, I suggest that "fear-mongering" be replaced with a term more in keeping with the measured tone expected from an Arbitration Committee decision.

I have no opinion on the merits of the case, or of the proposed decision.  Sandstein  22:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)